Enlil said:

She signed it. By doing so, she certified the contents.

Still, you reposted a link... Where's the evidence of fraud in that link? I would love to discuss said evidence.

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

feevers said:

A homeless man once told me aliens were invading his brain and making him dance the tango, I guess I should have sat with him and got the full story before drawing any conclusions.

---

That's a good example of evidence that's not very good.

---

shivas.wisdom said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Here's an example:

seagu said:

*****

---

No responses to that one.

---

You consider this to be compelling evidence of election fraud?

---

bodhisatta said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Here's an example:

seagu said:

So The Identity of The Kraken was "officially" revealed Yesterday by a High Profile Attorney working hand in hand with Trump and Sydney Powell and Now President Trump this Morning Officially Endorsed the Announcement :

https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2020/11/22/sidney-powells-kraken-is-dod-cyber-warfare-program-we-are-at-war/

Liberty and JUSTICE for All is coming to the USA. They thought they could steal the USA.. WRONG !!! After reading that article go read all of https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com ;

Its coming !!!

---

No responses to that one.

---

Let's start with the way it's written. If you have something compelling or important to say how would you approach conveying that information? Like a rambling drunk on a soap box or matter of fact and to the point?

Quote:

The CIA, FBI and DOJ are full of Treasonous Swamp Rats that are intent on stealing the Presidential seat, and taking over America for the global order. They are wicked globalist puppets who are boldly pushing their coup to destroy America and implement a global reset and usher in United Nations Agenda 2030 which is the revised version of sustainable development Agenda 21.

---

Sorry falcon no one can take that seriously unless they're a retard.

But fine. Let's try to digest the article and pretend it's worth reading.

There's a lot of accusations in there. They are what you're calling evidence. Accusations have to be backed up be evidence. There is none. You can't call any of Powell's declarations evidence. They're baseless accusations. Snowden for example produced evidence to go along with the accusations. Powell hasn't done any such thing.

So click the links in the article to dig deeper.

The first one is the same article repackaged.

https://breakingdefense.com/2013/04/army-releases-the-kraken-to-protect-foreign-fire-bases-id-lik/

This is confusing now the kraken is a physical device that helps soliders. Not something that examines domion servers or government agencies or the *deep state*

So that's a big red flag.

There's a video I'm not watching.

Am I missing something falcon?
What did you find compelling in those links/articles and why?

---

shivas.wisdom said:

I didn't ask if you know - I asked what you believe.

---

shivas.wisdom said:

Although, at this point it's pretty obvious from your avoidant answers that you don't believe the election to have been legitimate; but you probably don't want to make that belief explicit because you haven't been able to find any compelling evidence to support the claim of election fraud either, and that whole 'king of make believe' thing is ringing in your ears. .

---

bodhisatta said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

feevers said:

A homeless man once told me aliens were invading his brain and making him dance the tango, I guess I should have sat with him and got the full story before drawing any conclusions.

---

That's a good example of evidence that's not very good.

---

Now how come you get it in this case?

---

Kwyjibo said:

You keep crying about make believe but you'll blindly accept that there's evidence without proof.

---

feevers said:

It seems you haven’t noticed that my posts were mockingly attempting to dumb things down to the level you’d apparently like to debate on...

---

Oh look!  More insults! 

feevers said:

But yet you spent more time dissecting my post than actually investigating this fraud you seem to be so concerned by, because when accusations go against the trump side your criteria apparently changes.

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Kwyjibo said:

You keep crying about make believe but you'll blindly accept that there's evidence without proof.

---

Not true.  I'm just saying I haven't seen many intelligent rebuttals to what some people here believe to be evidence.  I haven't read nearly as much as others like hamhead and seagu have.  Maybe their evidence isn't good, but hurling insults isn't the best way to respond.

---

bodhisatta said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Here's an example:

seagu said:

So The Identity of The Kraken was "officially" revealed Yesterday by a High Profile Attorney working hand in hand with Trump and Sydney Powell and Now President Trump this Morning Officially Endorsed the Announcement :

https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2020/11/22/sidney-powells-kraken-is-dod-cyber-warfare-program-we-are-at-war/

Liberty and JUSTICE for All is coming to the USA. They thought they could steal the USA.. WRONG !!! After reading that article go read all of https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com ;

Its coming !!!

---

No responses to that one.

---

Let's start with the way it's written. If you have something compelling or important to say how would you approach conveying that information? Like a rambling drunk on a soap box or matter of fact and to the point?

Quote:

The CIA, FBI and DOJ are full of Treasonous Swamp Rats that are intent on stealing the Presidential seat, and taking over America for the global order. They are wicked globalist puppets who are boldly pushing their coup to destroy America and implement a global reset and usher in United Nations Agenda 2030 which is the revised version of sustainable development Agenda 21.

---

Sorry falcon no one can take that seriously unless they're a retard.

But fine. Let's try to digest the article and pretend it's worth reading.

There's a lot of accusations in there. They are what you're calling evidence. Accusations have to be backed up be evidence. There is none. You can't call any of Powell's declarations evidence. They're baseless accusations. Snowden for example produced evidence to go along with the accusations. Powell hasn't done any such thing.

So click the links in the article to dig deeper.

The first one is the same article repackaged.

https://breakingdefense.com/2013/04/army-releases-the-kraken-to-protect-foreign-fire-bases-id-lik/

This is confusing now the kraken is a physical device that helps soliders. Not something that examines domion servers or government agencies or the *deep state*

So that's a big red flag.

There's a video I'm not watching.

Am I missing something falcon?
What did you find compelling in those links/articles and why?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

psi said:

The outcomes of the cases are the evidence he's presenting. One very plausible explanation for those outcomes is that the evidence brought forward in those cases sucked. If the evidence did not suck, then the outcomes of the cases must be accounted for in some other way.

---

I watched the Giuliani video and he said he only has 3 lawsuits.  Not sure who is bringing up the others.

---

psi said:

If good evidence was provided then the lawsuits should have gone somewhere, unless the court system is not functioning as it is supposed to.

---