starfire_xes said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

starfire_xes said:

Peer reviewed doesn't mean a whole lot if it is peer review of OPINION.

---

What opinion articles are peer reviewed?

---

You made a statement about peer review.  Show me a peer reviewed article that conservatives don't agree with.


Oh, can't find one? 


Generalizations are shit.  Lets have some specifics.  Oh, can't find any?

---

Let's see... which one should I pick? 

elax420 said:

IMO, Wikileaks is invalid till there is proof of life of assange

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Webster10 said:

Say what you want, but at one point, Hannity was one of the few, five or under, mainstream journalists that was reporting real news like Wikileaks during the election.

---

That's false.  I got a ton of WikiLeaks information from liberal sources.

Webster10 said:

I seem to remember the entire smug, elitist, "academia class" get proven utterly wrong and embarrassed themselves in their coverage of the election and reaction to the election results.

---

True.  But you seriously don't think I can find dozens of examples of conservative media being wrong and embarrassed as well about this?

Webster10 said:

I don't think I've ever been linked to a Harvard study in an argument and refused to believe the evidence. Why do liberals feel need to make things up?

---

Except the post you made just before this one. 

---

>I got a ton of Wikileaks information from liberal sources

well, I should've been more specific in my use of the word "reporting." Hannity's coverage of Wikileaks was unparalleled, especially by any liberal source. Most liberal sources didnt cover it, and when they did, they threw softballs, omitted damning evidence and tried to spin it in a more positive way. Hell, CNN's Jake Tapper told CNN viewers that it was ILLEGAL to view Wikileaks and that the viewers would have to rely on CNN analysis for their Wikileaks information. The liberal media flopped in their coverage of this election, Wikileaks included, any that's kind of just undeniable for anyone that was following politics during the election

>dozens of examples of converatives of being wrong and embarrassed

Oh I'm sure you can find many many examples of establishment republican cuckservatives being wrong and getting embarrassed. But it's just plainly incomparable to how badly the liberal media failed and how embarrassed they were/still are. The media colluded with each other, AND HRC to try to push her over the edge. They acted as a team. They controlled the news cycle constantly. They tried dog-piling on for every slightly negative story about Trump, and collectively ignored the Clinton corruption that was being exposed. The liberal media's historically bad coverage and subsequent childish meltdown is only a testament to how pathetic the left wing academia class really is.

>except the post you made just before this one

Yeah, I'm not denying a Harvard study. I'm merely doubting the "political authority" of elite professors. They were just as wrong and reacted as childishly as any of the other losers. Yes of course I'd have open eyes and ears if I were linked to a study, but no, I'm not going to unquestionably accept their opinions as fact.

Webster10 said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

I got a ton of WikiLeaks information from liberal sources.

---

well, I should've been more specific in my use of the word "reporting." Hannity's coverage of Wikileaks was unparalleled, especially by any liberal source. Most liberal sources didnt cover it, and when they did, they threw softballs, omitted damning evidence and tried to spin it in a more positive way. Hell, CNN's Jake Tapper told CNN viewers that it was ILLEGAL to view Wikileaks and that the viewers would have to rely on CNN analysis for their Wikileaks information.

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Peteyboy said:

viktor said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

One thing I learned from these boards is that Harvard professors and peer reviewed science are bad sources for conservatives, because they always seem to prove conservatives wrong.

We should rely more on college dropouts like Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck, and others who are too dumb to complete college.  They're the ones with all the answers. 

---

Or maybe just think for yourself

---

I go with think for yourself...unfortunately the guys that dropped out of college have proven themselves far more accurate and more tuned in to the real world and the social conscience...I guess Harvard and all their scholars aren't so genius anymore...

This is a great clip by the college dropout Hannity...

---

So Hannity is smart because someone on his team put together a clip of people who were wrong about Trump?  Liberal media have done that too.

---

Webster10 said:

elax420 said:

IMO, Wikileaks is invalid till there is proof of life of assange

---

He personally confirmed yesterday that Ecuador has restored his internet access in the Ecuadorian embassy.

---

Peteyboy said:

Hannity was saying Trump's gonna win before the election...

---

sweeper54 said:

It says a lot about the people who voted for him.

---

sweeper54 said:

The man is of low morals, a cheat, a liar, a fraud and too many other things to bother listing.

I have always opposed him even when he was a Dem.

---

hostileuniverse said:

sweeper54 said:

The man is of low morals, a cheat, a liar, a fraud and too many other things to bother listing.

I have always opposed him even when he was a Dem.

---

You've just described every politician

What's your point?

---

sweeper54 said:

I the end Pb lil'dick is going to lose, HUGH and take the whole congress with him.

---