Home | Community | Message Board

Cannabis Seeds Zamnesia
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | | Last >
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: bodhisatta] * 1
    #26737084 -

Cops are indoctrinated with stuoid mantras like "judged by 12 rather than carried by 6". They're shown footage of cops being ambushed and killed in the academy.

If you don't have the balls to handle a 75 year old man then you shouldn't even be a cop. An ordinary citizen openly carrying (if you want to cite potential reaching for a weapon) wouldn't have shoved the guy

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26737087 -

So what lol....

If you tell your girlfriend to stop arguing with you but she keeps going you're the kind that would shove her is what I think you're getting at

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: bodhisatta]
    #26737095 -

No, I'm the kind of guy that would put a bullet through her brain.

:dudewtf:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #26737101 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
natedawgnow said:
I can get murder charges for punching you in the face if you go down and
crack your dome and die. It's called one punch homicide. I didnt intend to kill
you but it happens.



I don't think murder and homicide are the same though.

natedawgnow said:
That cop shoved an elderly man. What if I pushed your grandma and she fell and bust a hip?
Would you say that I didn't actually push her that hard?



My grandma shouldn't be challenging police orders to obey curfew at her age.  If she broke her hip as a result, of course I'd be mad at the police, as I am in this case.

natedawgnow said:
Old people have a hard time with balance and what not already, that cop is a piece of shit and everybody but you seems to get that.



So cops should have a policy to allow the elderly get their hands close to their weapons?

Maybe someone can tell me what a more reasonable response by the cops would have been?



Murder and homicide are the same thing, the term is one punch homicide but
one punch killing is more accurate. I didn't make up the term.

You have no argument so instead you nit pick. Jesus dude what happened to you.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: natedawgnow]
    #26737106 -

Homicide is defined as anything that leads to one human killing another.
The type of homicide depends on the action that led to death, whether it was premeditated, etc.

At least thats how i understand it


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: bodhisatta]
    #26737107 -

bodhisatta said:
Cops are indoctrinated with stuoid mantras like "judged by 12 rather than carried by 6". They're shown footage of cops being ambushed and killed in the academy.



Exactly.

bodhisatta said:
If you don't have the balls to handle a 75 year old man then you shouldn't even be a cop.



They handled him.  What they should have done when the guy decided to try and stop the line of officers enforcing curfew?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: natedawgnow]
    #26737111 -

natedawgnow said:
Homicide is defined as anything that leads to one human killing another.
The type of homicide depends on the action that led to death, whether it was premeditated, etc.

At least thats how i understand it



Exactly.  If the guy died, this wouldn't qualify as murder.

natedawgnow said:
You have no argument so instead you nit pick. Jesus dude what happened to you.



Actually, I have an argument and you just agreed with my argument.  Or do you think if the guy died it would be murder?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 3
    #26737121 -

If the guy died, it might be manslaughter.  It might be felony murder.  It would depend on the evidence and what the jury believes.

Both are homicide.  Homicide is the general term, with murder, manslaughter, etc. being subsets thereof.  Not every homicide is murder, but every murder is a homicide.  Not every homicide is even a crime, frankly.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26737124 -

Regardless of what type of homicide it is, the cop would definitely have been
the one that killed the guy if he had died. No, we dont agree.

I'm not here to argue semantics with you. You are not a good person, obviously,
since you seriously cant see why this cop was in the wrong. Had the old man died
the cop definitely would have been guilty of homicide, in some form.

Right now it appears to be assault


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26737126 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
No, I'm the kind of guy that would put a bullet through her brain.

:dudewtf:



Look the cops cant set up a mandatory beat down zone. No one give a shit if they were enforcing curfew or told people to disperse. The action wasn't anywhere near justified. You don't get to assault people because they made you mad

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Enlil]
    #26737130 -

Enlil said:
If the guy died, it might be manslaughter.  It might be felony murder.  It would depend on the evidence and what the jury believes.



Fair enough.  :thumbup:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: natedawgnow] * 3
    #26737131 -

Your grandma shouldnt be out protesting? Great way to infantalise the elderly.
Your grandma is an american with rights and regardless of what you believe or
what enlil posted, curfews are bullshit.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: natedawgnow] * 1
    #26737151 -

natedawgnow said:
Regardless of what type of homicide it is, the cop would definitely have been the one that killed the guy if he had died.



Obviously.

natedawgnow said:
No, we dont agree.



You think it would have been murder if he died, meaning you think the cops had an intent to kill that guy?!?

natedawgnow said:
I'm not here to argue semantics with you.



This discussion started when koods claimed Trump rebroadcast something from Sputnik (he's since edited his post, but I caught the original).  Koods then tried to argue that since the guy also worked for Sputnik, that OAN broadcasting it is the same as Sputnik broadcasting it.  Maybe that's semantics to you, but to me he changed the story.  Maybe murder vs manslaughter is just semantics to you, but they mean different things.

natedawgnow said:
You are not a good person, obviously, since you seriously cant see why this cop was in the wrong.



Here's at least the third time I'm going to ask this, and I'll up it in big letters this time:

What should the police have done when the guy approached their lineup which was trying to enforce curfew?

"Not crack his head open" is an obvious non-answer.

natedawgnow said:
Had the old man died the cop definitely would have been guilty of homicide, in some form.

Right now it appears to be assault



Agreed.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: bodhisatta]
    #26737155 -

bodhisatta said:
Look the cops cant set up a mandatory beat down zone.



Obviously.

bodhisatta said:
No one give a shit if they were enforcing curfew or told people to disperse. The action wasn't anywhere near justified. You don't get to assault people because they made you mad



Answer the question in big letters from my last post, please.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: natedawgnow] * 1
    #26737164 -

natedawgnow said:
Your grandma shouldnt be out protesting? Great way to infantalise the elderly.
Your grandma is an american with rights



Of course she can protest.  Can you not argue in good faith?  :facepalm3:

I said "My grandma shouldn't be challenging police orders to obey curfew".  Like defying their orders to disperse and walking up to them and challenging their police line.

natedawgnow said:
...regardless of what you believe or what enlil posted, curfews are bullshit.



I already agreed with you on that many posts ago.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26737175 -

Asked him to leave first.
You seem to be having trouble with your big letter question. So here's one for you

how would cops that were not little bitches handled that old man? How would cops from a country with a civilized police force have handled it? How would you have handled him?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: bodhisatta]
    #26737187 -

bodhisatta said:
Asked him to leave first.



They obviously did that already.  Did you miss the video with the lineup of cops to clear out the square?

The guy challenged them anyway.  So what should they have done?

bodhisatta said:
You seem to be having trouble with your big letter question.



It wasn't a question for me, it was a question for you.  Still waiting on an answer.

bodhisatta said:
how would cops that were not little bitches handled that old man? How would cops from a country with a civilized police force have handled it? How would you have handled him?



That's what I'm asking you.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26737194 -

I answered it bro. They could ask him to leave again. They could also ignore him. They could have peacefully arrested him. You should be disqualified from the force if you couldn't arrest a 75 year old man peacefully

So do me the favor and answer your own question now.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 3
    #26737209 -

Those cops should have stayed home.  Barring that, they could do their jobs in a civilized fashion.  They could have cuffed the guy and detained him without any violence whatsoever had the situation required it.  Instead they assaulted him and busted his head on the concrete.  Any reasonable person would agree that there was no cause to assault that man.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Police appreciation thread [Re: bodhisatta]
    #26737214 -

bodhisatta said:
I answered it bro. They could ask him to leave again.



They did that, and obviously the guy didn't listen.

bodhisatta said:
They could also ignore him.



No, they couldn't have.  Their job was to clear the square for the curfew, so leaving people there wasn't an option.

bodhisatta said:
They could have peacefully arrested him. You should be disqualified from the force if you couldn't arrest a 75 year old man peacefully



Based on the video, I think the cops' primary goal was to clear the square, not to arrest people.  But that's a good answer.

bodhisatta said:
So do me the favor and answer your own question now.



The 'peaceful arrest' (whatever that means) that you just suggested.  :shrug:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | | Last >

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* 2nd amendment to justify shooting pigs?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
dee_N_ae 14,669 131 09/19/02 03:08 PM
by francisco
* War Pigs Evolving 425 2 03/18/03 04:40 AM
by zeronio
* Pigs Attack California Anti-War Protesters
( 1 2 3 4 all )
LearyfanS 5,438 71 04/09/03 05:22 AM
by Paid
* Haditha and the Psychosis of War
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Basilides 3,751 70 04/03/08 01:18 AM
by lonestar2004
* NSW Police are PIGS quiver 624 2 08/03/06 09:40 AM
by quiver
* Canadian pigs sieze grow-op home for first time in BC
( 1 2 3 all )
Dogomush 2,422 41 06/16/03 02:48 PM
by Azmodeus
* War Pigs. Icelander 501 7 07/09/08 03:54 PM
by Seuss
* Dutch pigs with guns Therian 415 7 04/19/09 12:57 AM
by Madtowntripper

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
42,876 topic views. 2 members, 15 guests and 32 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.042 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 18 queries.