Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

What does he care - our military's disproportionally black,

---

hostileuniverse said:

What do you think regulations are? When you control EVERY aspect of something, you run it. The govt doesn't run GM either, but they didn't just hand them a bunch of money and let them do with it as they please

---

KauaiOrca said:

hostileuniverse said:

What do you think regulations are? When you control EVERY aspect of something, you run it. The govt doesn't run GM either, but they didn't just hand them a bunch of money and let them do with it as they please

---

The government focuses on regulating the HEALTH CARE INSURANCE markets ... not health care.  Big difference.

---

hostileuniverse said:

And how do they pressure them? Is it similar to lobbying?

---

hostileuniverse said:

I can't wait until our healthcare is based on saving money rather than saving lives

http://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2015/11/17/pharmalot-agency-rejects-breast-cancer-drug/

---

hostileuniverse said:

I can't wait until our healthcare is based on saving money rather than saving lives

http://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2015/11/17/pharmalot-agency-rejects-breast-cancer-drug/

---

Lolz! You think our healthcare system is based on saving lives! Cute

gregorio said:

Everyone in the military is there because they chose to be.

---

Tipote said:

gregorio said:

Everyone in the military is there because they chose to be.

---

Well, that may be only because it gives the best benefits in terms of pay and going to college and getting a job afterwards.. for black people who are more likely to be from low incomes - it is one of the best routes. Not because they agree with all these wars.

Falcon was saying what would Trump care if more wars were started? the military is disproportionately black and Trump doesnt seem to care about black rights or agree that "black lives matter" too, OR does he really seem to think much before he speaks or acts so war is no biggy to him, he would just bomb shit and "go in there and take the oil" regardless of the loss of American life - black or white or purple.

Trump, like others on this thread, think BLM are just a bunch of cry babies.

---

qman said:

The leadership that sent the boys into Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan never gave a shit whether people on the front lines were white or black, so enough of this poor black people nonsense.

---

Quote:

regardless of the loss of American life - black or white or purple.

---

KauaiOrca said:

Tipote said:

armaggedon is almost 100% certain if trump won. who do you think on the republican side is likely to get it if not trump??

---

Campaigns generate  a lot of fire.  After you're sworn in,  you get a visit from the grown ups in the room that give you the full briefing on how global government works.  Then they fall in line.  Same will happen with Trump.  Elected politicians have power and unelected global government has more.

Trump / Rubio / Cruz / Fiorina are the only 4 I think that have a shot at this point.

I think Hillary is at least, if not more, dangerous as Trump.  Her poor judgment in the past, deteriorating mental condition and vulnerability to blackmail is a bigger risk, IMHO.

---

Webster10 said:

cause they chose to be

---

Webster10 said:

Let's face it. Bernie isn't getting the dem nomination. Because of the corrupt dem system, hillary already has almost enough support from super delegates alone to win. And honestly, hillary absolutely will not win a general election. She has lied too much and has been much too ineffective in leadership positions.

I really wouldn't mind Bernie all that much. Sure taxes would skyrocket, but I'd get free healthcare, legal pot, a campaign financing overhaul and other semi-helpful government assistance. Hillary's gonna crush him though, and she is by far the most corrupt and incompetent candidate.

---

Webster10 said:

I really wouldn't mind Bernie all that much. Sure taxes would skyrocket, but I'd get free healthcare, legal pot, a campaign financing overhaul and other semi-helpful government assistance. Hillary's gonna crush him though, and she is by far the most corrupt and incompetent candidate.

---

Tipote said:

Webster10 said:

Let's face it. Bernie isn't getting the dem nomination. Because of the corrupt dem system, hillary already has almost enough support from super delegates alone to win. And honestly, hillary absolutely will not win a general election. She has lied too much and has been much too ineffective in leadership positions.

I really wouldn't mind Bernie all that much. Sure taxes would skyrocket, but I'd get free healthcare, legal pot, a campaign financing overhaul and other semi-helpful government assistance. Hillary's gonna crush him though, and she is by far the most corrupt and incompetent candidate.

---

i agree, it would be good but it probably wont happen. at most he will be vice president. i agree hilary should not win but look at the republican alternatives. its not gna be a great choice. it never is.

---

Tipote said:

absolutely but she is still wall streets bitch and has proven experience being shit in government, but at least in government, so its more likely she than the republican will get it. plus she is a woman so women will probably vote for her in large numbers.

---

KauaiOrca said:

Webster10 said:

I really wouldn't mind Bernie all that much. Sure taxes would skyrocket, but I'd get free healthcare, legal pot, a campaign financing overhaul and other semi-helpful government assistance. Hillary's gonna crush him though, and she is by far the most corrupt and incompetent candidate.

---

Unless Hillary gets indicted, which I think is a very real possibility, she'll get the nomination.  The general is a different story though.  She'll get pounded mercilessly.

---

Webster10 said:

I really don't see her holding up in the general. The attack from the right will be too fierce. Although if trump, fiorina, cruz or rubio get the R nomination, I don't expect them to be pounded any less. I just think they will hold up better, Hillary is surrounded by way to much shady shit.

---

KauaiOrca said:

Tipote said:

absolutely but she is still wall streets bitch and has proven experience being shit in government, but at least in government, so its more likely she than the republican will get it. plus she is a woman so women will probably vote for her in large numbers.

---

I think her disadvantages out weigh her advantages in the General.  There are many factors indicating an advantage for the GOP this cycle ... more motivated, hard to win 3 cycles in a row, gains in congress and state elections, Obama and Hillary falling numbers and Hillary's age, health and baggage.  I'm just looking at it objectively as I don't really pull very hard for either party.  The candidates I tend to like NEVER get elected so whoever wins will be a disappointment to me.  My prediction is the FBI knocks her out, Biden/Warren get the nomination and it's a nail biter to the tend.

---