Supalemonhaze said:

Well, that's what you get for trusting someone like hashed. I mean, the guy did fuck another shroomerite in a trade IRL and then taunted him about it online. How low can you go?

---

lukehighwalker710 said:

Supalemonhaze said:

Well, that's what you get for trusting someone like hashed. I mean, the guy did fuck another shroomerite in a trade IRL and then taunted him about it online. How low can you go?

---

Gotta link?

---

ed

I messed up in that comment, it wasn't a shroomerite that he fucked over, it was a guy in reddit. Typed out "shroomerite" on autopilot

Fractaliopsybe said:

"Adaptability to specific types of wood(Secondary metabolites). this causes substantial speciation in plant pathogenic species of fungi. The Psilocybes are not eating living plants, but they are eating wood that has the chemicals still present in them.

Combine this with other environmental factors in combination with more then a single Genotype present within a species, and one or more of the genotypes might start separating from the group, leading to multiple phenotypes, and eventually speciation."


These apply to all mushrooms, not just psilocybes.

"Speciation can then be understood in terms of general models applied to other organisms. Trends of resource partitioning, divergent selection, etc., lead to genetic isolation of sub-populations. The exact way in which this occurs is still hotly debated

Mushrooms also have some unique genetic properties which may assist speciation events. Because mating type loci can become self-compatible as a result of only a few single mutations, mushroom lineages can switch breeding systems abruptly, leading to rapid sympatric isolation."

Food for thought

---

Adden said:

Those were great posts. Wish I could +5 you again. Thank you.

---

Hashed said:

No shit, if you find a wild cube and stabilize it, you just created a new variety, put you name on it, your find, your name, have it circulate, destroying egos in the process, making the world a better place, how is that egotistical?

Are mycologists who name new species "egotistical"
Was inski "egotistical" when he named P. subsecotioides.

How the heck is that egotistical, hard work and your own var. name, egotistical? Just go away.
That is just like stating mycologists who create species names are egotistical.

---

There is so much fail in this comment that I don't even know where to start.

Are we surprised that this person was all talk? I sure hope not.

Hashed said:

Grey said:

"Epiphany in the closet"?

---

I don't get it...

And ahahaha, agar is step number one, don't worry, I got this shit.

---

Haha all he got was shit! Hehe
As annoyingly entertaining as that BS was...
---(its history)---
Please for the love of Science!
Keep on topic! Hah

Subsistence would only have nickname privileges in most cases, As I have mentioned before it comes down to the binomial naming system, That's only really when scientifically accepted*

Fractaliopsybe said:

Re: strains(Binomial nomenclature) 10 year old thread*
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/5678224#5678224

---

So does anybody agree with me about them being possibility introduced from Texas as P.Subcubensis??
I just think there's too many inconsistencies with that find.

I know I have not been hunting long..
But I have not seen any like this nor anyone else with similar finds to this one.
Especially in the conditions it was found in*

Ran-D said:

I personally don't find it all that crazy to see cubensis on wood, not the first time it's happened on here.

---

Mattisfat said:

Hunter hunter, is that second pic in your sig all psilly?

---

Mattisfat said:

Wow

....

What did you name it?

---

Ran-D said:

I personally don't find it all that crazy to see cubensis on wood, not the first time it's happened on here.

---