Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics > Mushroom Cultivation
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 782 | 783 | 784 | 785 | 786 | 787 | 788 | 789 | 790 | 791 | 792 | 793 | 794 | 795 | 796 | 797 | 798 | 799 | 800 | 801 | 802 |
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: R4cMan]
    #29640605 -

Did I get unlucky with by Ochra grows so far, if their potency was less than cubes?

To be fair, I did do a major mistake of cloning an untested plin and I kept doing that for too long. I reset to spores, but those are also not anything remarkable. The spores would have been from underwhelming grows, so maybe that could fuck me over a bit, but I figured that the genetic lottery would be great.

Somewhat mentioned in another thread a 2% potency test and it made me go damn son


--------------------
I call them Huskies cause they Mush!


The Official Wild Cubensis Thread
Instant Pot Agar
Gnocchi Water Agar
Let's Talk Cowtek

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Huskies]
    #29640663 -

Thats why i gave up on Ochra !!
Potency was never reliable sometimes they were very weak and other times they would just knock my socks off
All this was from the same flush and itโ€™s happened to me multiple times

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: 99.99]
    #29640681 -





1st image:
ochras at monotube (shoebox); 15 days after S2B...see many points/water droplets more dark..its ochras primordia? or contam..??

2nd image:
ochras at litle frutification chamber (water tub tek) after I take the cake from box of S2B.
Much fluffy in the top..

Only grow GTs until now
This go in a good way?? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: 99.99]
    #29641155 -

99.99 said:
Thats why i gave up on Ochra !!
Potency was never reliable sometimes they were very weak and other times they would just knock my socks off
All this was from the same flush and itโ€™s happened to me multiple times


Is that because people haven't selected it into varieties?

Are there any "strains" (varieties) of Ochra, or is it all just called Ochra?

I'm not saying there aren't, I just haven't paid attention and I'm curious.


--------------------
--I'm doing a poppy seed giveaway
--Why You're probably growing x7x+, not x7x!
--GROWING SHROOMS, FROM SPORES TO TRIPS
--x7x+ variety history.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: 99.99]
    #29641167 -

99.99 said:
Thats why i gave up on Ochra !!
Potency was never reliable sometimes they were very weak and other times they would just knock my socks off
All this was from the same flush and itโ€™s happened to me multiple times


Multispore or clones?

Would 3 generations of selecting the strongest fruits eventually make an impact?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: CreonAntigone] * 1
    #29641186 -

CreonAntigone said:
99.99 said:
Thats why i gave up on Ochra !!
Potency was never reliable sometimes they were very weak and other times they would just knock my socks off
All this was from the same flush and itโ€™s happened to me multiple times


Multispore or clones?

Would 3 generations of selecting the strongest fruits eventually make an impact?


I did five clones, but I still had too much variance and I couldnโ€™t get a really enjoyable trip from it so I quit

I picked fresh what I wanted to eat, and saved a piece for a clone
if it turned out to be more potent than a cube I put it on agar and grew it out and between potency and enjoyable trip I gave up
Going back to good old Jack Frost and ATL7

This was clone, number five

Edited by 99.99 (08/05/26 08:19 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: 99.99]
    #29641249 -

Clones don't really lock in much aside from more consistent size of fruits/colonization speed/ cluster consistency/enzyme production and few other traits I won't mention

If u wanted to stabilize potency then do fenolial generation growing aka go from spore to harvest and do buncha potency tests on the fruits. Choose the most potent one to clone from or the weakest one... Whichever ur after locking in. Make a spore print from it gg ur now f1 repeat the process 7 x more following the same selections and at the end of it who knows.

U might end up with something more consistent for potency at this point is when I'd focus on getting a clone to try to make more full canopys/ more even growth

Long process though everything worth doing takes time and effort/discipline :rockon:


--------------------





An enigma some caerulescens n a mono ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Edited by bloodssonnew (08/05/26 09:37 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: 99.99]
    #29641250 -

Yo! It's been a while, Nats were my last grow and I see folks talking Orchas. Fill me in!
:yields:


--------------------
You're conscious population 2 stardust
----------------------
Nothing matters so everything does :sunny:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: bloodssonnew]
    #29641417 -

bloodssonnew said:
If u wanted to stabilize potency then do fenolial generation growing aka go from spore to harvest and do buncha potency tests on the fruits. Choose the most potent one to clone from or the weakest one... Whichever ur after locking in. Make a spore print from it gg ur now f1 repeat the process 7 x more following the same selections and at the end of it who knows.



So you're saying potency would be more consistent if multispore is repeated from the most potent mushrooms over multiple generations? I'm not challenging you but what's the science behind this? Why would the multispore of the potent mushroom be more consistently potent than the clone of it?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: bloodssonnew]
    #29641453 -

Pheno hunting for potency is a total crapshoot. You get lucky or you don't. Has nothing to do with filial generation. Notice how TTBVI potency has been on the decline? If anything, you could just cause genetic senescence.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: cozmyc] * 3
    #29641454 -

Ok I'll explain.

For the longest time people were growing what was called natalensis. These were finally sequenced and compared to the holotype collection. Turns out they were not natalensis. They were actually a species that were never even described. Someone wrote a paper on this species that we were all growing for a long time and named it P. ochraceocentrata.

Meanwhile, no one had actual natalensis. Julian Mattucci and myself were able to obtain real natalensis from foragers in South Africa and we were able to grow them out and disperse the spores to the cultivation community.

Real natalensis are significantly harder to grow than ochraceocentrata.


Here are real natalensis:




I should probably just make a thread for this and link it in bio.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: PhenoDreamers] * 2
    #29641510 -

I want to clarify that the reason I donโ€™t like them and have quit growing them is not because they are weak and potency.
  It is sometimes they are so fucking potent that I almost lose my mind and other times itโ€™s a float down the lazy river.
I like to be able to have some kind of an idea about how strong the trip Iโ€™m going to have versus how many grams I eat

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: 99.99] * 1
    #29641527 -

Absolutely. Ochra is niles stronger than nats

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: PhenoDreamers] * 8
    #29641659 -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: bloodssonnew]
    #29642139 -

bloodssonnew said:
Clones don't really lock in much aside from more consistent size of fruits/colonization speed/ cluster consistency/enzyme production and few other traits I won't mention


Mention. I'm curious what you mean. This isn't a place to hint at secrets then hold them close to your vest.

bloodssonnew said:
If u wanted to stabilize potency then do fenolial generation growing aka go from spore to harvest and do buncha potency tests on the fruits. Choose the most potent one to clone from or the weakest one... Whichever ur after locking in. Make a spore print from it gg ur now f1 repeat the process 7 x more following the same selections and at the end of it who knows.


I wrote up this process in more detail after spending 2 years doing it: Notes on making your own shroom variety


--------------------
--I'm doing a poppy seed giveaway
--Why You're probably growing x7x+, not x7x!
--GROWING SHROOMS, FROM SPORES TO TRIPS
--x7x+ variety history.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: nektar61]
    #29642143 -



17 days after S2B my Ochras cake its overkayed.

What can I do? Wait right??
๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜„

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: mobyhat]
    #29642292 -

Clones you can work with symbiotic colony's that isn't possible from spore for example.

Clones also can encourage metabolite productions early on based on symbiotic colony's and also different materials used for the mycelium to colonize will also result in different enzymes being produced to begin breaking down that material xd

Let's say u put lc to grains for example then put a grain to agar then spawned that agar to bulk.

That lc would have the enzymes to jump from and to grains extremely easy n can also begin breaking them down to a pumice slowly ๐Ÿ˜Š

N let's say u also added straw water to ur agar it should theoretically have the enzymes to break that down too and jump to it with relevant ease

(I don't own a full blown lab and most of my information is from others and or from theory or opinions of mine ๐Ÿซก

Though here's a full blown off the rails crazy train thought. So certain bacteria can trigger metabolic reactions and initialize fruiting for some fungus on top of increase concentrations of psilocybin n other related materials just from being in close proximity of those bacteria.

Growing from spore it'd be pretty darn hard to compare generational grows with bacteria though doing it with controls and clones it seems more reasonable at least in my head lolol

And idk where this would be a benifit. Possibly outdoor tub grows that eventually become outdoor grows lol I'm to drunk n fighting some severe wisdom teeth impaction and infections ๐Ÿ’€


--------------------





An enigma some caerulescens n a mono ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: bloodssonnew]
    #29644224 -

Are these orchas?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: hiredgoons] * 1
    #29644229 -

hiredgoons said:
Are these orchas?




Probably not, the mature caps are very uniform in color. Ochras typically have gradiated ochre centers.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Rasmodius]
    #29644261 -

Don't some of them have black caps? There's a bit of black on these. Either these are ochras or a well regarded spore supplier is selling mislabeled syringes.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 782 | 783 | 784 | 785 | 786 | 787 | 788 | 789 | 790 | 791 | 792 | 793 | 794 | 795 | 796 | 797 | 798 | 799 | 800 | 801 | 802 |

Shop: MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics > Mushroom Cultivation
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Official Ps. Subtropicalis/Semperviva Thread
( 1 2 3 4 ... 543 544 )		 nosf3r4tu 342,445 10,879 08/16/26 11:41 AM
by Buckdog
* Psilocybe Zinnii official thread.
( 1 2 all )		 Bigworm 412 23 08/21/26 03:06 PM
by Bigworm
* Official Psilocybe zapotecorum thread
( 1 2 3 4 ... 84 85 )		 Hindsight 78,001 1,693 08/20/26 09:56 PM
by CosmicCamote
* The OFFICIAL Stone producer/sclerotia thread and discussion
( 1 2 3 4 ... 749 750 )		 firstTIMER420 577,031 14,998 08/21/26 02:13 PM
by CosmicCamote
* Official Misc EXOTIC Thread
( 1 2 3 4 ... 203 204 )		 Jakeoncid419 176,150 4,078 08/19/26 04:33 PM
by CosmicCamote
* Genesis of the PF Redspore Psilocybe motamanM 7,780 16 12/05/03 08:59 AM
by Anonymous
* Psilocybe graveolens berto23 4,233 2 06/19/08 03:23 PM
by caliche
* Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens
( 1 2 3 all )		 JazzMatazz 60,256 43 11/25/14 05:30 PM
by 707godheadcymaster

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, the_chosen_one, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, hamloaf, cronicr, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a
610,468 topic views. 18 members, 2,393 guests and 143 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.042 seconds spending 0.016 seconds on 16 queries.