Bigbadwooof said:

hostileuniverse said:

Quote:

Our country will go broke trying to keep every human alive as long as technology can possible allow.  That's reality. 

Over 50% of ALL health care spending happens in the last 2 years of life.  That's ridiculous.

---

It is ridiculous, but as long as the person is wiiling to spend it, I think that should be their right, also it's another very important reason to oppose single payer. If you want to die as soon as you get cancer, so be it. But please, don't make that decision for the rest of us.

KEEP YOUR LAWS OFF MY BODY!

---

Are you saying you support doctor assisted euthanasia? There may be a liberal innyou afterall!

---

burgerbrain said:

Wow, strawman much? Who said I wanted to put down thieves? This is the extent of liberal debate these days.

My ancestors didn't steal anything from the Indians, or enslave anyone, so what the fuck are you talking about?

If someone attempts to hurt me or my family then they will get what's coming. What's the problem with that, liberal?

Yes liberals are the problem.

---

akira_akuma said:

burgerbrain said:

Wow, strawman much? Who said I wanted to put down thieves? This is the extent of liberal debate these days.

My ancestors didn't steal anything from the Indians, or enslave anyone, so what the fuck are you talking about?

If someone attempts to hurt me or my family then they will get what's coming. What's the problem with that, liberal?

Yes liberals are the problem.

---

yes, they are. liberals like yourself are the problem.

no one attempted to hurt you or your family...in fact, no attempted to hurt anyone at that protest...save the people in the article...that's what the article is about.

see, i made the analogy of the thief, because statistics say that America robbed the land from the Indians, just like some people want to push that BLM people are being racist, America has a history of racism, and it doesn't just "go away".

and instead of facing it, they'd rather just cut the head of the snake, and say "do away with it".

which is unconstitutional (the aim to stop BLM protests), and unethical as all fuck, even if it's just opinions.

---

akira_akuma said:

concurrently, there is minimal racism, that's is practised legally, but then also is supported by on-the-fence white race supporters, whom support their "right" to be racist, and simply don't open up about it.

YES, the US did STEAL the land from the Indians. there was no treaty. there was war.

no, black people do not hurt people at an alarming rate, they have black-on-black crime at an alarming rate. if you're gonna parrot bullshit, at least use that bullshit in the right context.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls

yes, many people in Paris were harmed and killed, what was the point of bringing that up? for me to redirect you to the whole-sale slaughter of Indians and Mexicans during the 1800s?

and you're a liberal, because you're a republican.

i'm a liberal conservative too...only i'm not a republican. thank god. i don't need someone to vouch for my own individual freedoms, i just have them...whoo.

---

akira_akuma said:

LOL, you believe the horrible propaganda 90% (oh first it was 80% but now it's 90% according to this guy) of black people kill whites, even though i just gave you the statistics proving that abhorrently wrong.

the USA did fight for it, under the guise of Manifest Destiny, a rather British invention, if i do say so myself, and then under that guise, decided that morally, the Christian settlers didn't have to kow-tow to their sensibilities, and any moral, provided by God, of course; and they just went to a land to ESCAPE TAILS BETWEEN LEGS from the British, and then thought "hmmm, i don't belong here, but i think i'll just take it". this was before are common sense laws nowadays of not committing war crimes...so yeah, we did steal it, by today's understanding of world politics. we stole it and you are proud, and you'd gladly repeat the process, which is why sensible people are so worried about you liberal crazies.

also, i'm an advocate for open carry laws, and am not in the UK, so you didn't quite succeed in portraying accurate information there, either.

---

Here you go, naïve one:


Hehe, America kicked Britan's asshole over and over and you whine. Poor guy. America also kicked the fuck out of the Indians in teepees; the British people resent any victories that the USA had in the past- Now we're supposed to be allies but you fuckers are killing the white race.

akira_akuma said:

LOL, ok, i'm not British. but whatever, son.

and if American's are concerned with freedom, and with the perspective that thy didn't steal but "won" the land from the Indians, then you're a hypocrite if you insist that BLM can't protest...or that they shouldn't...or that they should screen their ranks for potential activists that might do something drastic, because they are the most likely candidates for progressive tactics, just like you constitutionalists did to the rally over in Minneapolis, trying to instigate the crowd. if you're allowed to do whatever works, Hoss, then you can't bitch and bemoan someone using what you proclaim is a viable tactic. even though it's all horribly unjustified, and only damages the instance of political freedoms, and the 1st amendment rights, being jostled, only further enrages both parties into wanting to start a war. very unethical. very republican. very liberal of you.

your bugaboo might be that you're so liberal, you can't even see it. you're a Trump supporter to, aren't ya?

---

akira_akuma said:

and BTW if there was a white protest involving the deaths of whites...there'd be the same proclivity for riots. see Atlanta race riot, for one out of many examples.

you're simply trying to enforce racist and undemocratic and unconstitutional rhetoric and actions, while trying to perpetuate the loss of the pieces of the constitution that you "are fighting to protect" (and who knows at what length), the pieces of which you agree with; even though the constitution is fine, and progress as a society is still being made, albeit slowly, with all the in-fighting and political nonchalance, and carte blanche, that several opposition adhere to to try and get THEIR WAY, and American on the fast track to THEIR WAY of life, and not an American one.

you liberals.

---

burgerbrain said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

crime rates have gone done.  So what's your explanation for the drop???

---

There are many reasons people are less violent statistically, one has to do with more guns. Or do you want to stick to your idea that more poverty is more violent crime? HAHAHA, liberals.

---

I can't wait to see your evidence that poor people don't commit more crime. 

burgerbrain said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

It's clear you don't even have a college degree, so stick with your ad hominem attacks; it's the one thing you're good at.

---

All I get from you is ad-hominem, ad-hominem boy. I'll bet you post some more ad-hominem

---

Since you don't have a college degree, it's not an ad hominem attack.

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

burgerbrain said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

crime rates have gone done.  So what's your explanation for the drop???

---

There are many reasons people are less violent statistically, one has to do with more guns. Or do you want to stick to your idea that more poverty is more violent crime? HAHAHA, liberals.

---

I can't wait to see your evidence that poor people don't commit more crime. 

burgerbrain said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

It's clear you don't even have a college degree, so stick with your ad hominem attacks; it's the one thing you're good at.

---

All I get from you is ad-hominem, ad-hominem boy. I'll bet you post some more ad-hominem

---

Since you don't have a college degree, it's not an ad hominem attack.

---

akira_akuma said:

of course when a police officer approaches a black suspect, they aren't going to shoot right away, cause that's instantaneous bad publicity, so they'll wait until he turns or jerks the wrong way, and say "he had a weapon, so i shot".

but when an officer approaches a WHITE guy, he aims faster and shoots quicker because of the LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY he has to the murder of a white person.

---

akira_akuma said:

i have logic. no source but my own, and i looked at the study, and found an incredible bias, that no one reported on, that i know of.

the fact is: of course people in a study like this will be apt to preform, as an officer of the law, as best as they can...and they will, if informed of the consequences, act nicer to both instances of racial categorization...but if not informed, which they weren't, they'll still see the data they are aiming to study, in regards to "which race is profiled" the most, by seeing that blacks are held to a higher standard in being handled correctly by way of procedure, while being viewed by on-lookers; all while the "profiling" of the whites are looked-on as being proportionally against the stereotype, all at once.

biased.

but it helps me, sadly, a person who cannot conduct his own study, but, with logic, i can explain my conclusions directly. i'm sure some more open minded people will agree with me when i say, the bias is clear in the study; and as per my previous post, that you've quoted, the same bias is revealed in how police profile people, in actuality, based on the political climate, and given the rate at which crimes by police are being reported on and video taped, as evidence.

---

akira_akuma said:

and i've given you the stats, that say that isn't true.

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls

here you go again.

you have zero logic. hopefully this can turn into a debate about that, that'd be more fun, certainly.

---

Dude you posted a link to "Expanded Homicide Data Table 6 - Murder " how does this show that blacks are killed more than whites by police? The link doesn't talk about police homicide... AHHAHAAHAHAHA



Fuck I'm arguing with a liberal 99%er... wtf.

Yes you have ZERO logic. Nite, Anti-logic