Quote:

---

In fact, I think that bisexuality is much more common than one might imagine.

---

I agree, though I'm not stating any kind of fact I feel that human beings are simply sexual regardless of what you would like to throw in front of it (homo, hetero, or bi). An effect of our using language seems to have lead to the idea that categorization is neccessary, and once being categorized the differences (which only seem to exist in the world of language and the world of symbols) become apparent and fear finds many cracks to slip itself into.

As far as I'm concerned, a mouth is a mouth in the dark.

Quote:

---

AlphaFalfa said:
That seems quite true. It seems that the projection works as a way to compare, the context of that comparison seems to be of equal importance then.

Ie. You can compare your body to guys, in the context of girls. Or you canc compare you body to guys, in the context of whether that guy would be interested in sex.

Twah!

That is what happen before. I was contextualizing the projection to women and the tastes that I assumed they generally had and spent alot of time trying to satisfy the preceedings of that; usually a desire to be more physically fit.

That makes more sense because projections are not all that bad. In fact, they are useful when choosing who to approach and engage in an interaction that could potentially lead to sex.

hey, for clarity, does projection symbolize keeping your body in mind, while perceiving anothers body?

---

Quote:

---

AlphaFalfa said:
What about you all?

What say ye about thine sexuality?

---