Home | Community | Message Board

Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   MagicBag.co Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags   Mushroom-Hut Mono Tub Substrate   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore Bulk Substrate

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
mutant screening
    #6795165 -

what about screening fungal lines for enhanced production of tryptamines, after exposing the spores with uv radiation, a high majority would be sterilized but you could find some interesting results.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: mutant screening [Re: mrmackey]
    #6795176 -

How?
RR


--------------------
Download Let's Grow Mushrooms



semper in excretia sumus solim profundum variat

"I've never had a failed experiment.  I've only discovered 10,000 methods which do not work."
Thomas Edison

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: mutant screening [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #6795229 -

In the 70's people used colchicine from the winter crocus as a potency booster with marijuana crops, the problem is, its poisonous meaning you wait until the sencond generation to screen the mutants, I thought using a uv light, like the kind they use in food steralization units and flow hoods , would work in low doses as a mutagen, of course it means screening stocks made with isolated spores,

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: mutant screening [Re: mrmackey]
    #6795232 -

You will first need a way to accurately quantify the levels of tryptamines in the dried mushrooms to be able to determine differences between fruiting cultures. Asking friends for potency ratings after eating them isn't good enough.


--------------------
Research funded by the patrons of
The Spore Works
Exotic Spore Supply

My Instagram
Reinvesting Sales Towards Basic Research and Species Identification :amanitajar:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: mutant screening [Re: Workman]
    #6795255 -

ether extraction of psilocybin from liquid cultures, measure the yield weight of standardized extracts

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: mutant screening [Re: mrmackey]
    #6797030 -

You could use a DNA cross-linker, like a strata-linker to expose the spores to UV. More likely you would be best to just use a germicidal UV lamp. You could figure out the exposure required to get 1% germination and you would end up with a good percentage of mutants.

That's a pretty standard method at least. You never know what you might find.


-FF

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: mutant screening [Re: Workman]
    #6806375 -

Subjective potency ratings with a double-blind *would* be good enough, if you did it to some scale.

But uh, I don't guess anyone has a big ol' focus group lying around.


--------------------
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: mutant screening [Re: figgusfiddus]
    #6806496 -

some people with serious experience should start with simple mutagens uv, or something like ethidium bromide, if you do it with plants you often get huge results from viable lines. What you guys want is an initiative where people are experimenting and sharing data and culture samples.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: mutant screening [Re: mrmackey]
    #6806579 -

I think this would be too cumbersome a task without a reliable method for measurement. What you're describing is a full-time job--actually, twelve or twenty full-time jobs. Tack on the fact that testing through trial takes five hours per go, and you've got a big fat impractical mess.

Now, if one of you folks has a mass spectrometer... heh.

I think substrate additives have a better chance of improving potency in the long run than artificial selection. You've got a practical cap in terms of protein content, and it's no wonder that cubes--considering their fave substrate and size--have a rather standard ceiling in terms of psilo content.


--------------------
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS
FGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDSFGSFDS

Edited by figgusfiddus (04/18/07 10:14 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   MagicBag.co Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags   Mushroom-Hut Mono Tub Substrate   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore Bulk Substrate


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Growing high content 4-HO-DPT/4-HO-DMT mushrooms.
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
theshiftingwalls 50,437 147 09/29/05 04:05 PM
by ripper225
* Time to Think! (Tryptamines)
( 1 2 all )
Acinaxuz 8,331 30 04/02/09 09:46 AM
by RogerRabbit
* Tryptamine addition to jars via P. Viridia
( 1 2 all )
JohnnyRespect 4,875 25 06/21/03 12:33 PM
by micro
* tryptamine content in different substrates Auditory Misperception 2,180 7 11/13/02 09:12 AM
by Dogomush
* TRYPTAMINE + SUBSTRATE=30mg 4-HO-DMT per 1 dry gram skullfarmer1979 2,855 14 06/30/04 05:19 PM
by Teon
* The DMT and tryptamine connection
( 1 2 3 all )
Sclerite 10,591 45 04/28/07 08:46 PM
by special_k
* How to CREATE new kinds of Shrooms. (For Real!)
( 1 2 3 all )
AsanteM 14,907 54 01/06/05 10:58 AM
by ZeroArmy27
* Who wants to experiment w/Tryptamine?
( 1 2 all )
micro 3,571 22 11/03/03 12:30 PM
by dcx

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: RogerRabbit, cronicr, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta
1,619 topic views. 0 members, 0 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.022 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 16 queries.