ballsalsa said:

Quote:

pre-emptively enlighten me any way you want

---

Bruh, they linked the data already.  Absolutely wild that you're still out here like "enlighten me if you dare"

---

christopera said:

mushboy said:

FoolOfElysium said:

‘Hey, we don’t do that here.’”

---

hence the HUGE effort to try to distance a homegrown ..'terrorist' and label them as anything but an outsider. one of THEM.

its aint working to well is it?

---

Is there going to be a point in time where we can just respond to fool with nothing but fool quotes?

We have to be getting close.

---

Something is definitely getting close.



@Shive. I'm actually taking a break from the shroomey for a while and am gonna let things play out. I keep getting distracted here instead of finishing my Baldur's Gate campaign.

When I come back my first post will in reply to your article, as promised. Time simply keeps eluding me. However, I don't like the last things you've said to me here. Please don't project shame onto me when it doesn't exist. You should be able to make an argument without these false assumptions. They make your arguments weaker. Same with blanket statements (I'd argue bullshit lies)  that I've "never" articulated a positions beside XYZ. That's untrue by any metric. I'm not perfect. Nobody here is, but I can't work with these rigid  blanket statements. That's all I have to say about that for now.

In the meantime, I'd like to reiterate to forum one final time that the left seems to have absolutely no clue the can of worms they just opened due to their behavior over the last few days. Our country is returning to sanity, so people who have gotten away with the shittiest of behavior (like celebrating the death of an innocent man with a family), aren't used to the things they say now actually having consequences.

We're entering a MAJOR FAFO period in this Country for the left. Historically, it might be the biggest one we've ever seen.

They won't lose their freedom of speech, but they're all losing their jobs and the respect of the normies who aren't politically obsessed. It's like boomerang cancel culture, except instead of digging up things people may have said or did 1, 5, 10 years ago, we were all privileged to watch it all play out in real time.

And I'll say it bluntly .*anyone* that celebrated the death of in innocent man should never, EVER have political power in this country EVER again... and MAGA is going to make damn sure of it now.

Cheers. Enjoy the fucking ride.

FoolOfElysium said:

Our country is returning to sanity

---

christopera said:

Baby_Hitler said:

Testosterone level is kinda meaningless. Testosterone sensitivity is just as big of a factor. Some people need more testosterone for the same effect.

---

Testosterone is measured by the amount of Benjamins you have to pay the ex cop for injections at your nearest body building gym. It’s less about the testosterone you naturally have and more about standing around half naked flexing your muscles and asking the dude beside you how swole you are.

That’s how you know you’re a real man and not some pussy trans dude.

So beat it with your science and reason, okay.

---

Warrk said:

If Tyler Robinson gets the death penalty for shooting and killing Charlie Kirk then surely Vance Boelter should also get the death penalty for shooting and killing Melissa and Mark Hortman, does anyone here agree with me or not?

If anything Boelter should get a harsher penalty for killing 2 people (and a dog).

---

Then, they stepped up security, pacifists against guns.

FoolOfElysium said:

@Shive. I'm actually taking a break from the shroomey for a while and am gonna let things play out. I keep getting distracted here instead of finishing my Baldur's Gate campaign.

When I come back my first post will in reply to your article, as promised. Time simply keeps eluding me. However, I don't like the last things you've said to me here. Please don't project shame onto me when it doesn't exist. You should be able to make an argument without these false assumptions. They make your arguments weaker. Same with blanket statements (I'd argue bullshit lies)  that I've "never" articulated a positions beside XYZ. That's untrue by any metric. I'm not perfect. Nobody here is, but I can't work with these rigid  blanket statements. That's all I have to say about that for now.

---

Smartattack said:

Sunk cost is a hell of a drug. I wouldn't be too keen to shift an opinion either if I was pouring bad takes online 14 hours a day for years. Valid counter points are probably being discarded within the optic nerve before any processing centers lay a finger on it.

---

shivas.wisdom said:

ballsalsa said:

Quote:

pre-emptively enlighten me any way you want

---

Bruh, they linked the data already.  Absolutely wild that you're still out here like "enlighten me if you dare"

---

lol right? and you know he's already primed to dismiss the results of the study with his "I tend to go off the pulse of the nation itself" - aka vibes and confirmation bias


@FoolOfElysium

I don't think you've ever articulated a position beyond 'big things are coming and you'll regret choosing the wrong side - just wait!' - but I don't need to define the specifics in order to point out that your rhetoric on this forum has been promising violent retribution to your political opponents. Maybe it's true that inside, you consider revenge to mean "see people's jaw drop" but when everything you post instead refers to hangings and military tribunals, it doesn't matter what's in your head. Even in this post, you decided to conclude with the desire to see your political opponents hanged - and again, it doesn't matter if you justify this by saying 'they've committed crimes against humanity' or 'we will bring the receipts', it's still promising violent retribution to your political opponents - in fact, creating legal justification for political retribution is incredibly common if we look at historical oppressive regimes.

Why are you so ashamed of your beliefs? I have no problem being upfront about my fringe politics, or the various illegal and violent methods of political resistance that I endorse. I know that fascists utilizing entryism will often choose to 'hide their power level' but I get the vibe that your attempts to claim you are a left-leaning centrist who abhors political violence is done more for your own benefit - you actually believe your lies even if very few people on this subforum do. I guess that ties back into the earlier comments about cognitive dissidence, ie. you trying to reconcile the contradiction between your self-image and your politics.

---