Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1905 | 1906 | 1907 | 1908 | 1909 | 1910 | 1911 | 1912 | 1913 | 1914 | 1915 | 1916 | 1917 | 1918 | 1919 | 1920 | 1921 | | Last >
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Leftfield420] * 1
    #29342370 -

Make no mistake social media has been flooded with people saying charlie kirk is their martyr and they'll make it their lifes mission to continue to speak the "truth" he was preaching. Everyone on my friends list that were essentially apolitical are now going full on conservative, liberal hating. I called it from the moment this happened that this would make a martyr. People who are in the middle or apolitical saw the reaction from the far left and were so disgusted they decided to completely join the cause they were staying out of.


That doesn't nessicarily mean theyre now maga but it IS galvanizing the right and getting converts.  Literally if people just didnt celebrate this it probably wouldnt have moved the needle much.

Hope the victory lap was worth it.


--------------------
R.I.P
Zombi3, Blue Helix
Modest Mouse
Zappa, Jellyfish
Slothie
That Kid With The face
ShLong
Le Canard
split_by_nine
& Big Worm Forever
Etched in the sands of time in the shroomery and ever so beloved and deeply missed by many :heart:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Seriously_trippin]
    #29342371 -

Seriously_trippin said:
Make no mistake social media has been flooded with people saying charlie kirk is their martyr and they'll make it their lifes mission to continue to speak the "truth" he was preaching. Everyone on my friends list that were essentially apolitical are now going full on conservative, liberal hating. I called it from the moment this happened that this would make a martyr. People who are in the middle or apolitical saw the reaction from the far left and were so disgusted they decided to completely join the cause they were staying out of.


That doesn't nessicarily mean theyre now maga but it IS galvanizing the right and getting converts.  Literally if people just didnt celebrate this it probably wouldnt have moved the needle much.

Hope the victory lap was worth it.



No one person gets to decide who a martyr is. The collective decides that with their attention.

Charlie Kirk is going to go down in history as THE (republican party) martyr of the early 21st century. There's no doubt.

And yeah, I agree. Great job amping this with your cheering, liberals. You just created 100 new Charlie Kirks. Gawd, sooner or later these children need to grow up and learn how this Cosmic Game works. They keep making moves that just self-sabotage. At first I was angry, but now it's just laughable.


--------------------
Here comes...

Edited by FoolOfElysium (09/12/25 10:56 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: FoolOfElysium] * 1
    #29342377 -

FoolOfElysium said:
I will read your link this weekend, promise. A lot to take in and it's a few hours past beer o' clock... but in the meantime, I'll probably agree with you that historically (though perhaps until recently), gun violence comes from more right-wing homes.

But a lot of instances are similar to the (supposed) killer in Utah. He comes from a very conservative family, but has harbored his resentful position for a while, which at least in his case should at the very least *unaffilliate* him with republicans if not make him a left winger (those that know him seem to think so...) so there's a fascinating debate to be had about internal political affiliation relative to what they have said publicly. (A lot of Mormons, for example, hide their rebellion from their family for reasons I am happy to elaborate on from personal experience. It's extremely common. I'm sure others relate here in their own way.)

Most "republican" school shooters are rebels against their republican family and their values... what does that *really* make them, politically? Are we required to put a label on it? Maybe the labels aren't useful in their case at all...

Nevertheless, this can't absolve that republican family's teachings from *influencing* their child into this corner. It's a mixed bag of family upbringing, and rebelling into the unknown without any resources or way to survive... and then often making a deal with the first Devil that promises you more than what you currently have.

More soon.



"If they're against Republicans, they're probably a left-winger" assumes a black-and-white overly simple political spectrum, but it's entirely possible for the extreme right to target establishment conservatism.

If you're interested in the process of labelling ideological violence, the study I linked has a section which discusses that very question.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Seriously_trippin] * 2
    #29342390 -

Seriously_trippin said:
Make no mistake social media has been flooded with people saying charlie kirk is their martyr and they'll make it their lifes mission to continue to speak the "truth" he was preaching. Everyone on my friends list that were essentially apolitical are now going full on conservative, liberal hating. I called it from the moment this happened that this would make a martyr. People who are in the middle or apolitical saw the reaction from the far left and were so disgusted they decided to completely join the cause they were staying out of.


That doesn't nessicarily mean theyre now maga but it IS galvanizing the right and getting converts.  Literally if people just didnt celebrate this it probably wouldnt have moved the needle much.

Hope the victory lap was worth it.



Meh, in my experience growing up in punk rock circles, those who self-described as 'apolitical' were far more often right-wing but wishing to avoid social consequences. Even if that's not the case with your friends, I don't think anyone who was comfortable sitting things out until Charlie Kirk getting smoked convinced them to go MAGA was ever gonna be an ally anyways. Reminds me of MLK talking about the white moderates who prefer "a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice" - more upset about random Twitter users posting mean things about a dead fascist, than you are with a billionaire-owned media and elected politicians starting a hate campaign against a fictional transgender assassin. Excuse me for not holding much faith in the solidarity offered by those who decided honoring the memory of Charlie Kirk was the line in the sand that couldn't be crossed.

This reaction we're seeing to Charlie Kirk's death isn't new - the Italian right-wing get upset when people celebrate Mussolini's death on yearly anniversaries and make nearly identical arguments as what I've seen following Charlie Kirks death - it's not a good faith argument, and it will be used no matter the context. Have you not yet clued in that Republicans don't care about hypocrisy, they just fling shit and hope something sticks? - this is true of fascists around the world and throughout history - it's what Satre was referring to when he wrote about their absurdity. I'm not going to base my politics around 'don't be upsetting' - and although I don't think Charlie Kirk dying is worth a celebration, I can't find a single fuck to give towards those who would police my politics through their lens of decorum.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: shivas.wisdom]
    #29342391 -

shivas.wisdom said:
FoolOfElysium said:
I will read your link this weekend, promise. A lot to take in and it's a few hours past beer o' clock... but in the meantime, I'll probably agree with you that historically (though perhaps until recently), gun violence comes from more right-wing homes.

But a lot of instances are similar to the (supposed) killer in Utah. He comes from a very conservative family, but has harbored his resentful position for a while, which at least in his case should at the very least *unaffilliate* him with republicans if not make him a left winger (those that know him seem to think so...) so there's a fascinating debate to be had about internal political affiliation relative to what they have said publicly. (A lot of Mormons, for example, hide their rebellion from their family for reasons I am happy to elaborate on from personal experience. It's extremely common. I'm sure others relate here in their own way.)

Most "republican" school shooters are rebels against their republican family and their values... what does that *really* make them, politically? Are we required to put a label on it? Maybe the labels aren't useful in their case at all...

Nevertheless, this can't absolve that republican family's teachings from *influencing* their child into this corner. It's a mixed bag of family upbringing, and rebelling into the unknown without any resources or way to survive... and then often making a deal with the first Devil that promises you more than what you currently have.

More soon.



"If they're against Republicans, they're probably a left-winger" assumes a black-and-white overly simple political spectrum, but it's entirely possible for the extreme right to target establishment conservatism.

If you're interested in the process of labelling ideological violence, the study I linked has a section which discusses that very question.



I won't speak for every former "extremist," but as a former Mormon, I can *absolutely and unequivocally* state that in the case of the supposed story of the person who shot Charlie Kirk... *nobody* who rebels against Mormonism does so in any right-wing fashion. (Aside from those who want to start their own break off of the religion of course.) We go HAAAAAARD the other way.  That was me from 2007-2016. Mormonsim in no way shape or form creates right-wing *rebels* that would do something like shoot Kirk. That manifests from a *rejection* of the religious philosophy... which of course means a rejection of the political philosophy in *most* cases as well. And then a looooot more on top of it.

(A caveat: On the subject of Mormon rebels, I'm referring to the loudest. Lots of the quiet ones slip into mainstream Christianity, but you don't ever hear a peep from them.)

I know my culture well enough. When it comes to Mormonism I must speak out against its leadership. They helped created this mess, too. I can speak with experience because I was one of them in every way for a long time. I know their methods like I know the air I breathe in my lungs.


--------------------
Here comes...

Edited by FoolOfElysium (09/13/25 12:24 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: FoolOfElysium]
    #29342401 -

Who said that he killed Charlie Kirk in rebellion against the Mormon Church?

And your decision to exclude "those who want to start their own break off of the religion" seems designed to give you the result you want: no right-wing rebellion - but when the reality is that groups of far-right Mormons clash with LDS Church leadership over their pursuit of a theocratic white ethnostate, your decision to exclude breakaway Mormon groups clearly doesn't provide a full picture.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: FoolOfElysium] * 2
    #29342403 -

FoolOfElysium said:
No one person gets to decide who a martyr is.




FoolOfElysium said:
Charlie Kirk is going to go down in history as THE (republican party) martyr of the early 21st century.



...

the guy that killed charlie kirk appears to be a groyper, which is even further right wing than most of maga.  thats nick fuentes territory, who happened to be in a feud with CK. 

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: shivas.wisdom]
    #29342404 -

shivas.wisdom said:
Who said that he killed Charlie Kirk in rebellion against the Mormon Church?

And your decision to exclude "those who want to start their own break off of the religion" seems designed to give you the result you want: no right-wing rebellion - but when the reality is that groups of far-right Mormons clash with LDS Church leadership over their pursuit of a theocratic white ethnostate, your decision to exclude breakaway Mormon groups clearly doesn't provide a full picture.



I threw down that caveat because the FLDS exist and Warren Jeffs is a man who truly deserves Hell. That was all that was on my mind when I said what I said.


--------------------
Here comes...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: dinosaurs]
    #29342406 -

dinosaurs said:
FoolOfElysium said:
No one person gets to decide who a martyr is.




FoolOfElysium said:
Charlie Kirk is going to go down in history as THE (republican party) martyr of the early 21st century.



...



LOL!

Uh.... Yeah! Cuz the republican collective has OBVIOUSLY decided it will be so. I'm just paying attention. Did you think I was just expressing my own opinion? If anything, you should be jabbing at me for being master of the obvious. 

Work a little harder on your burns, bro. Was this the best you got? (And you must have really been looking through my posts to attempt this one. Talk about an epic fail.)


--------------------
Here comes...

Edited by FoolOfElysium (09/13/25 12:33 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: FoolOfElysium]
    #29342416 -

FoolOfElysium said:
HagbardCeline said:
dinosaurs said:
his point stands, which is why you replied to anything but that point.



I obliterated his argument earlier with a thorough six point take down and the only thing he could muster in retort was restating the same thing I just logically dismantled. He appears to have an entirely undeserved opinion of himself and his abilities. It would be laughable if not for much of the MAGAs  being similarly level-capped and in sufficient numbers to exert undue influence (along with the underhanded techniques) over our political system.

I am curious as to what happened to these internet raised kids that so severely stunted their ability for discernment and the resultant susceptibility to manipulation. Do they not teach kids how to properly evaluate the validity of ideas anymore? I also wonder if gamer culture (concurrently with trolling braggadocio of social media) warped their sense of confidence and assessing their own abilities.



For someone that talks so highly of their ability to "obliterate" their competition in debate, you decide to show up out of nowhere and avoid confronting me directly to instead talk about me in the third person to someone else.

Call me old-fashioned, but that's probably the most pussy-ass move one could ever make in a setting like this.



I literally did a point-by-point takedown of you and your only response was saying the same thing again, so what am I supposed to respond to? Your attempt at a retort was essentially nothing more than a "nuh-uh", which is a far more reasonable example of a "pussy-ass" (:lol:) response than what I did. When a clown gets on stage and performs as you have done, it is common to discuss the quality of the act with those presently viewing. This is a practice that likely extended back into antiquity, so no, I wouldn't even call you old fashioned.

But don't get too down, as I have observed, you have continued your traditional practice of lying and misrepresentation, therefore I will provide you with another lesson and opportunity for growth soon.


--------------------
I keep it real because I think it is important that a highly esteemed individual such as myself keep it real lest they experience the dreaded spontaneous non-existance of no longer keeping it real. - Hagbard Celine

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: HagbardCeline]
    #29342419 -

HagbardCeline said:
FoolOfElysium said:
HagbardCeline said:
dinosaurs said:
his point stands, which is why you replied to anything but that point.



I obliterated his argument earlier with a thorough six point take down and the only thing he could muster in retort was restating the same thing I just logically dismantled. He appears to have an entirely undeserved opinion of himself and his abilities. It would be laughable if not for much of the MAGAs  being similarly level-capped and in sufficient numbers to exert undue influence (along with the underhanded techniques) over our political system.

I am curious as to what happened to these internet raised kids that so severely stunted their ability for discernment and the resultant susceptibility to manipulation. Do they not teach kids how to properly evaluate the validity of ideas anymore? I also wonder if gamer culture (concurrently with trolling braggadocio of social media) warped their sense of confidence and assessing their own abilities.



For someone that talks so highly of their ability to "obliterate" their competition in debate, you decide to show up out of nowhere and avoid confronting me directly to instead talk about me in the third person to someone else.

Call me old-fashioned, but that's probably the most pussy-ass move one could ever make in a setting like this.



I literally did a point-by-point takedown of you and your only response was saying the same thing again, so what am I supposed to respond to? Your attempt at a retort was essentially nothing more than a "nuh-uh", which is a far more reasonable example of a "pussy-ass" (:lol:) response than what I did. When a clown gets on stage and performs as you have done, it is common to discuss the quality of the act with those presently viewing. This is a practice that likely extended back into antiquity, so no, I wouldn't even call you old fashioned.

But don't get too down, as I have observed, you have continued your traditional practice of lying and misrepresentation, therefore I will provide you with another lesson and opportunity for growth soon.



Nah. I've blown my load over more challenging retorts already. I don't do, "nuh-uhs." Ya gotta show me what exactly. I'll play.

Nice try though, trying to make it easy on yourself.


--------------------
Here comes...

Edited by FoolOfElysium (09/13/25 12:59 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: FoolOfElysium] * 2
    #29342420 -

FoolOfElysium said:
I threw down that caveat because the FLDS exist and Warren Jeffs is a man who truly deserves Hell. That was all that was on my mind when I said what I said.



Sure but over application of that caveat has seemingly blinded you to how right-wing extremism can target conservative groups. It's not always 'I went out and did drugs and had casual sex to rebel against the church' - sometimes it's 'the church leaders have betrayed our values by saying we shouldn't hate LGBTQ+ people'.

Which is very similar to, as dinosaurs mentioned in their previous post, an ongoing fracture within the sphere of US right-wing political commentators - where you have people like Nick Fuentes, who choose to target people like Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro because he doesn't think they go far enough. It's not always 'you are too fascist' - sometimes it's 'you aren't fascist enough'


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: FoolOfElysium] * 2
    #29342448 -

Quote:
FoolOfElysium said:
If the left had condemned the violence against Kirk alongside MAGA, this wouldn't be happening. The public assassination of someone who was only exercising their freedom of speech should be a non-partisan issue, but leftists went and screwed it all up again.




If only you say. Let's see.


1. Joe Biden — Former U.S. President (Democrat)
“There is no place in our country for this kind of violence. It must end now. Jill and I are praying for Charlie Kirk’s family and loved ones.”.

2. Barack Obama — Former U.S. President (Democrat)
“We don’t yet know what motivated the person who shot and killed Charlie Kirk, but this kind of despicable violence has no place in our democracy.”.

3. Kamala Harris — Former Vice President / Senator (Democrat)
Publicly said she was “deeply disturbed” and emphasized that “political violence has no place in America” and must be condemned.

4. Hakeem Jeffries — House Democratic Leader
“I am shocked by the murder of Charlie Kirk… Political violence of any kind and against any individual is unacceptable and completely incompatible with American values.” (official statement).

5. Elizabeth Warren — U.S. Senator (D-MA)
“This shooting is nothing short of horrific. I'm praying for Charlie Kirk and thinking of the students at the event in Utah.” (tweet/statement).

6. Nancy Pelosi — Former Speaker, senior Democratic leader
Joined broad condemnation and called for rejecting hatred and political violence.

7. Chuck Schumer — Senate Democratic Leader
Condemned the shooting and joined calls to reject political violence.

8. Gavin Newsom — Governor of California
Called the killing “sick and reprehensible,” urged that differences be resolved through debate, and mourned Kirk’s family. (official statement).

9. Cory Booker — U.S. Senator
Publicly said the attack “must be condemned by all.”

10. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) — U.S. Representative
Warned about political chaos and emphasized the need to reduce political violence (public posts / replies collected by news outlets).

11. Bernie Sanders — U.S. Senator (I-VT)
Released a video/statement condemning political violence and expressing condolences (“Political violence has no place in this country. We must condemn this horrifying attack.”).

12. Pete Buttigieg — Former Cabinet official / prominent Democrat
Included in lists of top Democrats condemning the killing and urging de-escalation.

13. Bill Clinton — Former U.S. President (Democrat)
Publicly expressed sorrow and joined calls for introspection and condemnation.

14. Hillary Clinton — Former Secretary of State (Democrat)
Condemned the assassination in public comments included in news roundups.

15. Amy Klobuchar — U.S. Senator (D-MN)
“I am praying for Charlie Kirk and his family. There is no place for political violence in our country.” (social post/statement).

16. Stacey Abrams — Voting-rights leader / former Georgia official
Posted: “Political violence has no place in our country. No one should fear being shot for their politics.” (social post).

17. Gabby Giffords — Former Congresswoman, gun-violence survivor
Condemned the killing and used it to underscore that political violence and gun access are national crises; posted/reacted publicly.

18. Sen. Mark Kelly — U.S. Senator (D-AZ), husband of Gabby Giffords
Condemned the assassination as “despicable” and called for turning down the temperature. (interview/statement).

19. Ilhan Omar — U.S. Representative
Included among Democrats publicly condemning the shooting; she and other members pushed for de-escalation language.

20. Pramila Jayapal — U.S. Representative (progressive leader)
Posted that “political violence should have no place in this country” and condemned the killing. (social post).

21. Katie Hobbs — Governor of Arizona (Democrat)
Called the tragedy about a family and community loss and urged unity against violence.

22. Summer Lee — U.S. Representative (D-PA)
Emphasized gun-violence policy needs and that political violence cannot continue; quoted in progressive outlets.

23. Susan Rice — Former National Security Adviser / diplomat
Included in the list of prominent Democrats and commentators condemning the act in media roundups.

24. Matthew Dowd — Political analyst (left-of-center commentators condemned the act; note: his later comments drew criticism and he was fired by MSNBC for a separate remark) — he also made remarks condemning violence; his firing related to follow-on comments. (context in news coverage).

25. Rebecca Kutler / MSNBC (leadership and anchors) — News leadership
MSNBC publicly denounced celebratory or insensitive comments and stressed no place for political violence. (network responses documented).

26. Prominent progressive commentators & activists — e.g., Van Jones, ** Katrina vanden Heuvel** (examples of left media/activist condemnation) — appear in aggregated reports denouncing the killing and calling for cooling rhetoric. (news roundups).

27. State and regional Democratic leaders (a sample: Massachusetts, California, Arizona senators and governors) — many issued statements condemning the murder and calling for unity. (multiple state news sources).

28. Gun-violence organizations and advocates (represented by figures like Fred Guttenberg) — while not elected politicians, they are influential on the left and publicly condemned the assassination and used it to push gun-safety measures.

29. Progressive members of Congress including Rep. Rashida Tlaib / Rep. Jamaal Bowman — included in media lists of Democrats calling to reject political violence (news roundups).

30. High-profile left-leaning media figures and late-night hosts (e.g., Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel) — they publicly condemned the killing, framed it as an attack on democratic norms and called for de-escalation.

Yikes! That is a lot of the top people from the left denouncing it. Something you claimed did not happen. Looks like you are wrong again. But why stop here, let's look at what the right did when the shoe was on the other foot so we can further demonstrate your lack of insight and abilities. Let us see what MAGA said when Paul Pelosi was attacked and/or the Democrats in Minnesota were assassinated.

Case A: Paul Pelosi Hammer Attack (October 2022)

1. Donald Trump Jr.

Shared a meme of a hammer and underpants with the caption: “Got my Paul Pelosi Halloween costume ready.”

Added commentary: “OMG, the internet remains undefeated.”

In the same post: “If you switch out the hammer for a red feather boa, you can instantly transform yourself into a Hunter Biden.”

Also posted: “Imagine how safe the country would be if democrats took all violent crime as seriously as they’re taking the Paul Pelosi situation. They simply don't care about you.”

The attack involved severe violence, including a skull fracture, yet the response turned it into a joke.

It mocks a victim of violence, rather than expressing empathy or condemning the perpetrator.

Uses insensitive sexual / homophobic insinuations (e.g. underwear + hammer, mention of Hunter Biden) which aim to humiliate.

Politicizes the event immediately, using it to attack political opponents rather than focus on the human trauma.

2. Kari Lake

At a campaign event, made light of the security situation: “Nancy Pelosi … she’s got protection when she’s in D.C.—apparently her house doesn’t have a lot of protection.”

Instead of acknowledging the violence, she used it to imply negligence or weakness.

The remark is dismissive and shifts blame subtly onto the victim’s security, rather than focusing on the attacker.

Case B: Shootings / Assassination of Minnesota Democratic Politicians (June 2025)

1. Laura Loomer

After the killings, claimed without evidence that Governor Tim Walz was associated with the shooter. Example: “And your friend murdered her. Hopefully you are investigated.” referring to Walz.

Suggested the shooter was a “friend” or “ally” of Gov. Walz, though there is no substantiation.

Called the Democratic Party a “terrorist organization.” It scapegoats innocent people, attributing blame before facts are known.

It equates normal political actors / institutions (the Democrat Party, a governor) with terrorism or complicity in brutal murder.

Conflates speculation with accusation, which can fuel outrage, retaliation, or radicalization.

2. Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah)

Lee offered a prayerful message following Wednesday's shooting, and extended condolences to Kirk's wife and children while calling for swift justice.

But the Republican struck a far less gracious tone in June, including a post on X that said: "Nightmare on Waltz Street," a jab referencing Walz. Another post falsely stated: "This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way," while including an image of Boelter, who friends and public records described as politically right-leaning, having once registered as a Republican in Oklahoma. and implied Governor Walz bore responsibility.

Spreading ideological labels (“Marxist”) without evidence, based merely on political animus.

2. Donald Trump Jr. and others

Falsely or prematurely blaming the Left / Democrats for the shootings in Minnesota, despite evidence showing suspect had at least some right-leaning / pro-Trump views.

Using the tragedy for ideological point scoring; contributing to misinformation.

B. Charlie Kirk Assassination (September 2025)

3. Jesse Watters (Fox News host)

After Kirk’s death: said that MAGA will “avenge” Kirk’s death.

Framing the incident as part of an ideological war; using “retribution” language. Many observers took that as exceeding acceptable rhetorical bounds in response to political violence.

4. Donald Trump

Saying “we have to beat the hell out of radical left lunatics” after the Kirk killing.

Also blaming “radical left political violence” and saying many innocent people are hurt by people demonizing those they disagree with. But his rhetoric has been criticized for fanning partisan animosity.

5. Right-Wing Media Voices / Influencers

Reports of Fox hosts, Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, Jack Posobiec, Laura Loomer and others calling for vengeance or using “we’re in a war” language.

Quote:
The shooting saw bipartisan condemnation from politicians.[68] Messages of sympathy came from United States President Donald Trump,[69] First Lady Melania Trump,[70] Vice President JD Vance,[69] House speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune,[71] and former president George W. Bush,[72] among other Republicans.[21] Democratic politicians also condemned the shooting, including former presidents Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden,[21][73] Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries,[74] California Governor Gavin Newsom, and Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar.[75]

Some politicians responded to the shooting by linking it to broader political debates. Before the shooter's identity and motivations were revealed, several prominent right-wing voices and some congressional Republicans placed blame on Democrats, and called for war and vengeance.[76][77][78] Republicans have accused liberals of "inciting violence with rhetoric". Democrats and some news media pushed back against the claim, describing Trump's divisive rhetoric also factor in coarsening public debate and that political violence had impacted both parties. Democrats also used the event to further discussions of gun safety legislation.[79] Some Republicans also used the event to condemn liberal beliefs and ideology as evil.[80]

President Trump blamed the "radical left" for Kirk's and other recent deaths, saying they "compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis", but did not pay tribute to recent Democratic victims of violence.[81][79] The response received criticism for blaming his political opponents as accessories to murder,[82] and NBC News called Trump's response "far more polarizing than many of the other messages offered by politicians and representatives of both parties".[79] The next day, Trump stated that "We have radical left lunatics out there and we just have to beat the hell out of them", but later said he hoped his supporters would be nonviolent.[83]

Following the shooting, while Kirk was still believed to be in critical condition, Johnson held a 30-second moment of silence in the U.S. House of Representatives for Kirk, observed by all House members. Following disagreements on the floor, the event descended into partisan rancor and accusations by both sides.[84] Trump ordered all flags to be flown at half-staff until that Sunday at 6 p.m. in Kirk's honor;[21] he later released a video tribute to him. The next day, Trump announced that Kirk would be posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom.[85]

Christopher Landau, the United States Deputy Secretary of State, urged social media users to turn in foreign residents of the US who mocked or celebrated Kirk's death.[86] The US State Department said it would review the legal status of immigrants found to be "praising, rationalizing, or making light" of Kirk's killing.[87]



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Charlie_Kirk

:wonka:

Tell me more about this fantasy land you live in.

Now I'm sure you are going to say there were many on the left celebrating it...true, but they are deplorable individuals, not representatives of our political parties and institutions. But if that is your metric, the same thing happened with both the Paul Pelosi and Minnesota violence and you didn't make a peep. Plus, those speaking vileness were not leaders of the Democratic party. Plus, if you daftly want to continue claiming some validity to your lie, then be prepared to condemn all of Christianity for the few deplorable rats that like targetting abortion clincs for examples. Or the ones attacking religious instititutions.


--------------------
I keep it real because I think it is important that a highly esteemed individual such as myself keep it real lest they experience the dreaded spontaneous non-existance of no longer keeping it real. - Hagbard Celine

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: FoolOfElysium]
    #29342451 -

I did show you, you did repeat your claim. Look it up yourself.

You even did it again here, so yes, again, you were leveled and had no shot at redemption anyway.

But you get one more chance embody a circus clown with the long post I just made. I predict another laughable attempt coming from you if you continue running away from the wisdom that hunts you. You are just too quick for insight to ever catch you though I fear.


--------------------
I keep it real because I think it is important that a highly esteemed individual such as myself keep it real lest they experience the dreaded spontaneous non-existance of no longer keeping it real. - Hagbard Celine

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: FoolOfElysium]
    #29342463 -

FoolOfElysium said:
shivas.wisdom said:
How are you gauging "global attention"? Share your metric please.

I'll concede that you are correct here, in that left-wing extremism engages in far more property destruction than any other political ideology. But when it comes to violent attacks on humans? Right-wing extremism commits the majority of ideologically-motivated violence.

Since I'm sure you didn't intentionally avoid my posts subject matter, here's a link to my post that referenced a study on ideological violence: https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/29342106#29342106



I will read your link this weekend, promise. A lot to take in and it's a few hours past beer o' clock...



I lean toward a dismal existentialist outlook, but try to see the good things and common interests when they appear.

Also I just drove four young women home from the bar and they gave me five lines.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Brian Jones]
    #29342479 -

It would have been cooler if, in addition to the 5 lines, they agreed to each do you 5 times. Not all tonight, like a season pass sort of thing. Did they understand the implication?


--------------------
I keep it real because I think it is important that a highly esteemed individual such as myself keep it real lest they experience the dreaded spontaneous non-existance of no longer keeping it real. - Hagbard Celine

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Brian Jones]
    #29342481 -

And you noticed all 10 "good things" you communicated in your post?


--------------------
I keep it real because I think it is important that a highly esteemed individual such as myself keep it real lest they experience the dreaded spontaneous non-existance of no longer keeping it real. - Hagbard Celine

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: HagbardCeline] * 1
    #29342485 -

Fool is an obvious qanon believer. He’s not interested in facts.

Great post with the quotes though. There was a lot more sensitivity on the Kirk matter than the Right want history to see.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: christopera] * 1
    #29342550 -

I wish their slogan MAGA stood for "Make America Good (as in morally good) Again" instead, but the right would probably say it's not good enough.


--------------------
ONE-EYED WANT
-------------------------
knock a hoe out this dimension, continue my ascension
-bhad bhabie

rip. todcasil, acid sloth, st1llnox, shLong, ModestMouse, vinsue, big worm (sketch), tim

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Envix]
    #29342560 -

It’s not even about being great. It’s about stomping on the things they specifically resent. And in a lot of cases, they are willing to do it to spite their own nose.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1905 | 1906 | 1907 | 1908 | 1909 | 1910 | 1911 | 1912 | 1913 | 1914 | 1915 | 1916 | 1917 | 1918 | 1919 | 1920 | 1921 | | Last >

Shop: Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* French Ship Transits Hormuz
( 1 2 3 all )
Kryptos 583 42 04/12/26 06:53 PM
by Kryptos
* Energized By Trump's Win, White Nationalists Gather To 'Change The World' yogabunnyM 833 13 11/22/16 04:53 PM
by Mostly_Harmless
* The Trump Phenomenon
( 1 2 3 4 ... 50 51 )
Count of Sabugosa 41,280 1,006 01/27/16 02:53 PM
by zappaisgod
* Trump
( 1 2 3 4 ... 131 132 )
DividedQuantumM 78,041 2,635 01/19/21 07:19 AM
by STPLSD25
* Trump calls CNN fake news
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Psychonott 1,784 103 01/17/17 01:29 PM
by Falcon91Wolvrn03
* How will the Trump presidency end
( 1 2 3 4 ... 9 10 all )
koods 4,229 180 09/05/17 04:44 PM
by akira_akuma
* No proof has been found between Trump and Russia ties...
( 1 2 3 4 ... 103 104 )
Patlal 33,669 2,060 09/28/17 04:19 PM
by akira_akuma
* Donald Trump is an excellent president (his proponents are religious nutjobs, and zealots, however)
( 1 2 3 4 ... 21 22 )
akira_akuma 6,051 434 03/19/17 02:04 PM
by elax420

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
464,343 topic views. 1 members, 17 guests and 15 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.05 seconds spending 0.022 seconds on 17 queries.