Tantrika said:

MagicMush123 said:

Yea, like i said just cause he  doesn't specifically protect gays under law it doesn't mean hes anti gay

---

You are repeating yourself, not explaining how discriminating against gay people doesn't mean he is anti gay

---

MagicMush123 said:

Tantrika said:

MagicMush123 said:

Yea, like i said just cause he  doesn't specifically protect gays under law it doesn't mean hes anti gay

---

You are repeating yourself, not explaining how discriminating against gay people doesn't mean he is anti gay

---

You haven't shown me that hes specifically discriminating agianst gays. All you've done is show that hes not accommodating or making specific laws to protect them and to you thats anti gay, and to me thats not.

---

koods said:

Free speech warrior Donald Trump and his DOJ have taken John Bolton to court to prevent him from publishing his book. Trump claimed today all his conversations are classified 🤦‍♂️

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

So lawyers are not to be trusted?  Is that right, Enlil?

---

MagicMush123 said:

a shit load of people dont think gays or trannys should be adopting kids or that mentally ill people should be allowed to join the military or people should have something other than M or F on their licenses

---

SirTripAlot said:

Cant employers still hold up thier own dress code?.....meaning if one works ,say, selling sport coats and said attire is required and one comes into work dressed in a two piece bikini, they can still be terminated? What if one claims that this is their transgender identity but the employer requests them to change?

It seems that clothing in general is an extension or related to sex/gender, how can it be enforced?

---

Tantrika said:

MagicMush123 said:

Tantrika said:

MagicMush123 said:

Yea, like i said just cause he  doesn't specifically protect gays under law it doesn't mean hes anti gay

---

You are repeating yourself, not explaining how discriminating against gay people doesn't mean he is anti gay

---

You haven't shown me that hes specifically discriminating agianst gays. All you've done is show that hes not accommodating or making specific laws to protect them and to you thats anti gay, and to me thats not.

---

"to me thats not"

then what, again, would you consider it to be?
you are saying that targetting a certain group for exclusion from legal protections afforded to citizens is not discrimination against them
so what would you consider it -- what would that be to you

MagicMush123 said:

I already pointed out that most American companies already have anti discrimination policies based on someone's race or sexual orientation.

---

and?
the fact that most American companies manage to be more progressive than trumps administration of discrimination is no way a point in favour of your argument
it is a distraction from the very real actions taken by trump

MagicMush123 said:

And if it wasn't for the trump administration questioning whether or not the original civil rights law was originally meant to cover gays as well the courts would have never ruled otherwise

---

so because the courts have to keep wasting time striking down trumps anti-gay agenda
that is meant to be support that trump is not anti-gay?
or did you actually intend to deliver a freebie point against your own argument

---

Those legal protections aren't fair to employers though. Ultimately i dont feel like anyone should be fired for being gay. I also think firing for people for being gay is super uncommon. But maybe firing transsexuals is. If i owned a business i feel like it wouldn't be fair to me if i have transexual employees who randomly go off on ltd to have sex changes. It would probably complicate my business and my insurance rates would go up

It shows that social changes usually change before law does. Look how all major companies adopted the pc sjw agenda. Companies like those actually try to hire gays, transsexuals or other minorities for they can boast about how diverse they are

christopera said:

Companies adopted pc policies because the vast majority aren't interested in buying things from piece of shit racists, sexists, etc.. There's no conspiracy about "agenda" to be found.

---

MagicMush123 said:

Those legal protections aren't fair to employers though.

---

MagicMush123 said:

Ultimately i dont feel like anyone should be fired for being gay. I also think firing for people for being gay is super uncommon. But maybe firing transsexuals is. If i owned a business i feel like it wouldn't be fair to me if i have transexual employees who randomly go off on ltd to have sex changes. It would probably complicate my business and my insurance rates would go up

It shows that social changes usually change before law does. Look how all major companies adopted the pc sjw agenda. Companies like those actually try to hire gays, transsexuals or other minorities for they can boast about how diverse they are

---