Home | Community | Message Board

Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: A modest evolutionary approach to gaydom. [Re: NiamhNyx]
    #8311275 -

Well like I said, as it is reflected in politics and society, the argument of nature vs nurture doesnt matter to me at least. But how often do we talk about shit that doesn't matter in this forum? As a philosophical concept, I would argue that nature vs nurture is one of the fundamental philosophical questions. Essentially I think comes down to free will, another issue that "doesn't matter". :shrug:


--------------------
Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
  The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
  The frumious Bandersnatch!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A modest evolutionary approach to gaydom. [Re: daytripper23]
    #8311398 -

Yes, it definitly is. When I say (or agree) that it doesn't matter whether or not homosexuality is primarily caused by genetics or socialisation, I mean that either way there isn't anything wrong with it, it isn't going away, and who gives a damn what someone else wants to do with thier private lives anyways? Does it make a difference what causes homosexuality? It exists and it seems probable that it will continue to exist whether there is a genetic link or not. No matter what the cause, it seems pointless to have a problem with other people's personal preferences.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A modest evolutionary approach to gaydom. [Re: gluke bastid]
    #8311415 -

Right, I had this in the back of my mind when I originally posted. If sexuality is dynamic, will someone who is "kind of gay" be less likely to reproduce than someone who is more straight? You make a good point, I do not think this is necessarily the case.

When dealing with evolution, what we conceive as probability plays a huge factor. If something is generally the case, the large scale of evolution will conceivably exaggerate this. Could we go so far to say that the "more gay" a person is, generally the less likely he is to reproduce? I was assuming so, but I really do not know. I wish I knew more about evolution, to understand such dynamic traits.


--------------------
Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
  The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
  The frumious Bandersnatch!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A modest evolutionary approach to gaydom. [Re: Chronic7]
    #8311458 -

I read an interesting study a while back that claimed that the more male offspring a woman has, the more likely that the next male offspring will be homosexual. (At least, statistically speaking, one study supports the finding that each older brother adds the probability of the next male sibling being gay by 33%.)

Perhaps homosexuality could be evolutionarily advantageous by serving as a form of population control?


--------------------
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Genetics and Homosexuality------I don't think so
( 1 2 3 4 all )
chemkid 10,032 78 07/29/02 03:45 PM
by chemkid
* homosexuality
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
ribbit 9,886 105 01/16/03 02:44 AM
by TeTr0
* . AnonymousRabbit 1,577 13 10/04/08 12:22 PM
by ExplosiveMango
* Evolutionary changes
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
niteowl 11,725 133 12/28/10 03:53 PM
by falcon
* On the inadequacy of evolutionary theory Ped 2,396 15 05/04/07 12:37 PM
by MushroomTrip
* nature vs nurture
( 1 2 all )
Cracka_X 3,017 21 12/22/09 02:14 AM
by yogabunny
* Nature or nurture?
( 1 2 3 all )
youbreakyoubuy 2,138 41 11/24/09 11:38 AM
by Poid
* The classic questions: nature or nurture? Genetics or blank slate? laserpig 832 3 04/30/09 07:11 PM
by teeter

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
2,023 topic views. 0 members, 63 guests and 31 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.021 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 15 queries.