Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Cannabis Seeds Zamnesia
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]
Survival of the fittest
    #2989268 -

This is an after-the-fact meaningless "analysis". As this statement is not predictive it has no value.

Which animals are the fittest? The fastest? Eagles are the fastest at over 120mph and are almost extinct.

Which animals are the fittest? The most prolific? Codfish were once the most plentiful fish in the ocean and are now in danger.

Which animals are the fittest? The most adaptive? Chameleon populations are down dramatically.


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2989298 -

It sounds like all of those animals are becoming extinct/in danger due to other [and fitter] animals and perhaps humans as well? Many animals can and do suffer from the human population indirectly let alone directly.

If this is the case, then does the "Survival of the Fittest" not hold true?



--------------------
Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2989309 -

Survival of the most adapting would prove to be true in the long run. Survival of the fittest, those fit to best survive, would be those that can stand chaos and change and still survive

My vote goes to the cockroach


--------------------
So long as you are praised think only that you are not yet on your own path but on that of another.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2989315 -

'Fit' refers to survival abilities. If they are endangered or instinct, then they are not good examples of 'fit' species.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: deff]
    #2989325 -

true. Doesnt matter how fast, strong or smart an animal is, unless it can adapt to having humans turn its habitat into a parking lot, its toast.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Ravus]
    #2989365 -

Survival of the most adapting would prove to be true in the long run.

True, but meaningless. As we are unable to predict which species will survive a thousand years from now and can only tell the "fittest" by their mere survival alone, what value do you see this statement has in adding to the knowledge base of environmental and evolutionary forces?


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2989438 -


"True, but meaningless. As we are unable to predict which species will survive a thousand years from now and can only tell the "fittest" by their mere survival alone, what value do you see this statement has in adding to the knowledge base of environmental and evolutionary forces? "

what a wierd thing to say.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Moonshoe]
    #2989451 -

What is "wierd" about it? I can predict the winner of a lottery 100% of the time AFTER it happens. So what? Does that mean anything to you?


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2989461 -

Why do we need to predict it? The whole thing is unfolding around us. Our idea of the natural selection process, our acknowledgement of it, does not change the fact it would occur without us. I think we came up with this term merely to try and explain the evolution of independant traits. (ie- giraffes with longer necks = more food = higher chance of survival = more chance to reproduce = more long neck giraffes).


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2989523 -

what i find wierd about it is that you appear to be jumping all over him for making a 'useless' statemtnt (pragmatically speaking) and yet he was responding to your thread, which you introduced by saying you had realised was just as useless.

If you feel statements that dont 'add to the body of knowledge about enviromental evolution' (or whatever) are not worth making (and this is already a strange belief) , than why did you post this thread? and if you do think its ok to say things that dont nescessarily push the borders of a field of science, why jump on him like that?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Moonshoe]
    #2989559 -

Why jump on Swami for jumping on Ravus when you don't jump on yourself? :smile:

Dammit deff, shut the fuck up you fag.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: deff]
    #2989567 -

i jump on someones statement not when i feel it disagrees with my own belief, but when i feel it is unnescessarily and hypocritacly harsh on someone and discouraging of free discussion.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Moonshoe]
    #2989572 -

I was trying to make a funny, but I can see it failed miserably :frown:


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: deff]
    #2989581 -

humour is often lost in the translation...

i'll try to lighten up
:grin: :stoned:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2989588 -

Quote:
Swami said:
Survival of the most adapting would prove to be true in the long run.

True, but meaningless. As we are unable to predict which species will survive a thousand years from now and can only tell the "fittest" by their mere survival alone, what value do you see this statement has in adding to the knowledge base of environmental and evolutionary forces?



True, because we don't have the proper knowledge of it. We cannot predict evolution in the longrun because of chaos theory, and just plain chaos. One little action might change all evolution and life forever

We can predict evolution like we can predict the point of a space an electron is at. Beyond our general false logic and perceptions, everything becomes probability to the human sciences until we can see ahead in time

Survival of the fittest still exists, whether you can predict it or not. Just because it is beyond the grasp of humans, it becomes "meaningless?"


--------------------
So long as you are praised think only that you are not yet on your own path but on that of another.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Ravus]
    #2989614 -

Well, does "meaning" exist outside of our illusioned existence? Or atleast our meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of meaning of.. oh gawd not again XD


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Ravus]
    #2989628 -

Saying sharks are the fittest (they are way down in population worldwide) because they have been successful for 500 millions years only points towards the past and gives us no more information than saying they still exist. This tells us nothing of the mechanism for survival nor anything about the future. Such "information" has no value to anyone.


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2991282 -

I'm not sure what you're getting at. Do you mean that the theory of evolution by natural selection is without any value since it has no power of prediction?

If that's what you're saying, here is a nicely written refutation:

http://www12.canvas.ne.jp/peters/colin/fitness.html

Here is another:

http://www.jimloy.com/biology/natural.htm

Pop biology interpretations of "survival of the fittest" as something we can use to predict the future is of course rubbish and leads to strange ideas like eugenics.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2991331 -

"True, but meaningless. As we are unable to predict which species will survive a thousand years from now and can only tell the "fittest" by their mere survival alone"

you can't predict the future swami...humans can kill themselves off and yet at this present time, we are the "fittest" animals.

as skorp pointed out, the animal's physical attributes aren't the only thing that matters when it comes to survival.

the ever changing environment matters. hell, a meteor could come from the sky and wipe everything out, who's the fittest then??


--------------------
Annnnnnd I had a light saber and my friend was there and I said "you look like an indian" and he said "you look like satan" and he found a stick and a rock and he named the rock ooga booga and he named the stick Stick and we both thought that was pretty funny. We got eaten alive by mosquitos but didn't notice til the next day. I stepped on some glass while wading in the swamp and cut my foot open, didn't bother me til the next day either....yeah it was a good time, ended the night by buying some liquor for minors and drinking nips and going to he diner and eating chicken fingers, and then I went home and went to bed.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Survival of the fittest [Re: Swami]
    #2991463 -

i find it interesting how no one's really brought up how much the changing environment affects/RULES evolution.

and why do we pick sharks? fuck sharks. bacteria and molds dominate this world hands down. 1 million years from now bacteria will be here. we will not.

their ability to reproduce/change rapidly is what makes their species the most fit to SURVIVE in the long run.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Life is intrinsically meaningless
( 1 2 all )		 Grok 4,112 29 02/10/07 12:43 PM
by BlueCoyote
* Survival of the Fittest EternalCowabunga 1,109 7 07/30/07 05:09 AM
by Rhizoid
* Prediction.... Sclorch 2,118 14 05/17/02 12:18 AM
by infidelGOD
* Have the Mayans predicted anything besides the 2012 thing....
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )		 Majawala 40,121 132 07/02/10 11:41 AM
by teknix
* Survival of the Fittest vs. Genocide
( 1 2 all )		 OrgoneConclusion 4,342 33 02/23/08 12:28 AM
by OrgoneConclusion
* could you survive?
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 RonoS 3,505 86 01/27/06 02:50 PM
by Icelander
* Diploid's Prediction
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 DiploidM 5,650 95 12/07/04 02:18 PM
by FreakQlibrium
* Has ANYBODY ever accurately predicted ANYTHING?
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 OrgoneConclusion 4,747 71 09/06/14 12:32 PM
by SneezingPenis

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
1,818 topic views. 0 members, 181 guests and 24 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.029 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 16 queries.