Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics > Mushroom Cultivation
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 781 | 782 | 783 | 784 | 785 | 786 | 787 | 788 | 789 | 790 | 791 | 792 | 793 | 794 | 795 | 796 | 797 | 798 | 799 | 800 | 801 | | Last >
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Lithop] * 6
    #29619054 -

From my discussions with Breyten Van der merwe he was fairly confident that toxonmy and testing concluded that cubensis doesn't grow naturally in SA and that all the 'cubes' found in South Africa are all Ochras.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: DERRAYLD]
    #29619079 -

Thank you DERRAYLD. I'm specifically asking about taxonomy and testing rather than idle speculation, because I'm pretty sure people (Alan? Yoshi?) mentioned that sequencing had already happened and they'd made a blog post/podcast about what they'd found, but then the post disappeared.

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if some of the Transkei genetics going around are cubes just because things got mixed up and misrepresented, but specifically wondering about what has been found in SA.


--------------------
Giveaway: Six Sides of the Cube Low-Spore "Black Cap" Ochra wedges

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: DERRAYLD]
    #29619080 -

Interesting.

Looks like Breyten Van der Merwe is onto some cool shit research wise (from what I can gather online) did you meet him IRL, DERRAYLD?

inb4:thatsracist:


@pickle_jars, yeah that was what I wondered since stuff gets mislabeld accidently often enough, or even just hot name slapped onto syringes by unscrupulous vendors.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: DERRAYLD] * 3
    #29619083 -

ochra-ms-gen2 l 14g fresh yesterday, potent: cathedrals, fractals, morphing.
took population swab set & targeted swab set from choco nip umbo fruit. Moving forward to generation3:


--------------------
Faht Links to Faht Grow Skills
Yoshi's cheat sheet to grains

"Alice asks the White Rabbit, 'How long is forever?' and he replies, “'Sometimes, just one second.'”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: MurphSmurf] * 1
    #29619103 -

@Chiron

If one of us was to label a spore print as oysters or some other legal variety, how would a customs agent know the difference? Do you really think they would bring a biologist in to compare spores to make an identification?


--------------------
I've got skills, they don't know where to use me
I'm like the best dressed guy at the nude beach
Nice to meet you!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: pickle_jars] * 1
    #29619142 -

pickle_jars said:
Thank you DERRAYLD. I'm specifically asking about taxonomy and testing rather than idle speculation, because I'm pretty sure people (Alan? Yoshi?) mentioned that sequencing had already happened and they'd made a blog post/podcast about what they'd found, but then the post disappeared.

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if some of the Transkei genetics going around are cubes just because things got mixed up and misrepresented, but specifically wondering about what has been found in SA.


Breyten is the one that sequenced it through the University of Stellenbosch originally if I'm not mistaken so this isn't idle speculation.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: DERRAYLD]
    #29619164 -

For sure. I meant I was specifically interested in updates from people who had sequenced it -- Breyten absolutely counts as a primary source! Thanks.

"Idle speculation" was referring to the previous "for what i've seen," "IMO lol" comments. I've searched lots and lots of old threads already too, but sequencing is objective. I was wondering if anybody had closed the loop on posts like this -- "Anyone ever sequence this variety?".


--------------------
Giveaway: Six Sides of the Cube Low-Spore "Black Cap" Ochra wedges

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: pickle_jars] * 2
    #29619174 -

This is why I confirmed that Breyten has sequenced most of the locally available 'cubes' and they all appear to be ochra.

Sorry I wasn't clear in that regard.

Lithop,  we're just online friends discussing hunting and growing.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: PuffM4gicDr4gon]
    #29619268 -

well, unfortunately, the customs agents are not so dumb, so any biological stuff that is not approved directly by Brazil's sanitary/agricultural authorities cannot be imported without direct certificates from the place I am receiving it from.

even so, it is possible to bypass this. like I said, if it is a standard envelope, like a normal letter, with the spores inside, probably no one will open it, nor will it be detected on an X-ray, so it is probably fine.

but i don't want to test it, and maybe face legal repercussions unless it is the only choice i have.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Chiron098] * 1
    #29619269 -

dont they grow naturally down there everywhere:shrug:


--------------------
HUSTLER
How U Survive This Life Everyday Resourcefully
epic GT mono tub
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/17277772

wbs tek
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/11525679
coir tek
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/11917410
results :thumbup:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: tripdawg420]
    #29619391 -

Legit certain strains I'm pretty sure u could send somewhat safely like ps azurescens. Doubt if customs got it n tryed to cult it to find out it's type they would likely fail lol as long as spores are legal that is


--------------------





An enigma some caerulescens n a mono 😎

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: MurphSmurf] * 1
    #29619435 -

MurphSmurf said:
ochra-ms-gen2 l 14g fresh yesterday, potent: cathedrals, fractals, morphing.
took population swab set & targeted swab set from choco nip umbo fruit. Moving forward to generation3:



Those are some chunky shrooms ya got there :eek:


--------------------
The closer you get to the meaning the sooner you know that you're dreaming

How the Bushman gets stuff done

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: tripdawg420]
    #29619570 -

yes, in certain places they do. i just don't have access to these places, as i live in a city. generally on rural areas, with cows, most of the times it has some cubes or psilocybes in general. i've seen that tropical climate is good for some exotics.

even though, the situation is not that bad as i paint. i can buy reliable liquid culture from a fair price. the guy i buy have the african transkei strain, that i think it is ochras, from what is described. i just don't like spending money without knowing why i'm spending money. i already have some 10 LC syringes of an average cube strain, Australian. i cultivated and ingested it this strain, and found a little bit low in potency. but it could be variance in potency between flushes or something. is also not that bad, but it could be better, lol.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Chiron098]
    #29620320 -



Is this aerial mycelium/overlay? Should I crack lid more?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: xamiv] * 3
    #29620756 -

xamiv said:


Is this aerial mycelium/overlay? Should I crack lid more?


No dont mess with it

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: 99.99]
    #29621280 -

12 days since spawning this mini-mono.

They are not overlaying much at all. I did try to select transfers that were not overlaying as much, not sure if this is a direct result or there is something else going on.

Since the overlay is not that bad, just let it ride?

How are they looking for moisture/fresh air?

Tub1


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Hotboxer]
    #29621282 -

Tub2


Edited by Hotboxer (07/10/26 01:40 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Hotboxer]
    #29621290 -

Tub3


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Hotboxer]
    #29621873 -

Hi everyone,
Im goin to have my first Ochra experience tonight.
What is the conversion factor for Ochra to Cube? How much dry Ochra do I need to eat to have comparable a 5-6g Cube experience?


--------------------
.
"How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The official Psilocybe natalensis/ ochraceocentrata thread. [Re: Blizzloo] * 2
    #29621907 -

They can be all over the place, but I’d say mine are usually comparable to PE level potency.


--------------------
LAGM2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 781 | 782 | 783 | 784 | 785 | 786 | 787 | 788 | 789 | 790 | 791 | 792 | 793 | 794 | 795 | 796 | 797 | 798 | 799 | 800 | 801 | | Last >

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics > Mushroom Cultivation
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Official Psilocybe zapotecorum thread
( 1 2 3 4 ... 90 91 )		 Hindsight 85,961 1,817 11/02/26 02:07 PM
by Kloakk
* Official Ps. Subtropicalis/Semperviva Thread
( 1 2 3 4 ... 566 567 )		 nosf3r4tu 363,060 11,325 11/01/26 01:53 PM
by Mychol
* Genesis of the PF Redspore Psilocybe motamanM 7,849 16 12/05/03 10:59 AM
by Anonymous
* Psilocybe graveolens berto23 4,328 2 06/19/08 05:23 PM
by caliche
* Psilocybe cyanescens question
( 1 2 all )		 Leviathon 3,701 24 09/28/03 12:03 PM
by Zen Peddler
* Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens
( 1 2 3 all )		 JazzMatazz 60,502 43 11/25/14 07:30 PM
by 707godheadcymaster
* Psilocybe weilii indoors Chief_ 4,241 7 01/14/12 02:09 AM
by dtowntoker
* Index of Psilocybe-containing fungus acidblue 480 3 10/09/04 12:36 AM
by hyphae

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: DERRAYLD, Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, the_chosen_one, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, hamloaf, cronicr, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a
640,176 topic views. 11 members, 141 guests and 137 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.017 seconds on 16 queries.