meltdowner said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Brian Jones said:

Twitter Inc. has begun inserting fact checking links to Trump's tweets when he spews bullshit. This according to that commie rag, The Wall Street Journal.

---

So can I now assume if there's no fact checker on Trump's tweets, then it must be true? 

This was a stupid idea by Twitter.

---

How can you fact check a prediction?  Twitter are absolute numbskulls.  We know the media and social media are all run by anti-American Companies but it's just ridiculous how far they'll go to bury themselves in their own illogical ideologies.

Trump's secons term is going to hurt a lot of feelings.

---

Enlil said:

Where are you guys reading the text of the order?  To my knowledge, it hasn't been signed or published yet.  How do you know what it says without reading it?

---

mandrin13 said:

koods said:

That is referring to medical grade masks.

Here’s their guidance on non medical masks:

Quote:

The use of masks made of other materials (e.g., cotton fabric), also known as nonmedical masks, in the community setting has not been well evaluated. There is no current evidence to make a recommendation for or against their use.
WHO is collaborating with research and development partners to better understand the effectiveness and efficiency of nonmedical masks. WHO is also strongly encouraging countries that issue recommendations for the use of masks in healthy people in the community to conduct research on this critical topic. WHO will update its guidance when new evidence becomes available.

---

---

I feel like this is a bold faced lie. (not by you Koods).

There are numerous studies from several years ago that show cloth masks are ineffective, and often times wearing a cloth mask resulted with negative effects.  No one is going to convince me that science has advanced so much in the past 5 years that we will suddenly see something different, which is why the mandatory cloth mandates are a joke, the WHO is a joke.

A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers

Simple Respiratory Protection—Evaluation of the Filtration Performance of Cloth Masks and Common Fabric Materials Against 20–1000 nm Size Particles

Cloth masks: Dangerous to your health?

These are just the 1st 3 results, if you set the google dates for up to 2019 to avoid COVID related stories you will get plenty of results.

---

Enlil said:

Where are you guys reading the text of the order?  To my knowledge, it hasn't been signed or published yet.  How do you know what it says without reading it?

---

Quote:

Sec. 4. Federal Review of Unfair or Deceptive Practices. (a) It is the policy of the United States that large social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the functional equivalent of a traditional public forum, should not infringe on protected speech.

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Twitter already has a Hateful conduct policy.

I didn't see anything in the draft executive order saying Trump wanted to get rid of that.

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

To my knowledge, Trump simply asked whether there would be an investigation.

There's nothing wrong with investigating, if Enlil is correct, amiright?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Twitter already has a Hateful conduct policy.

I didn't see anything in the draft executive order saying Trump wanted to get rid of that.

---

koods said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

To my knowledge, Trump simply asked whether there would be an investigation.

There's nothing wrong with investigating, if Enlil is correct, amiright?

---

It’s already been investigated. It’s a false accusation.

---

Enlil said:

Hate speech is protected speech.

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

koods said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

To my knowledge, Trump simply asked whether there would be an investigation.

There's nothing wrong with investigating, if Enlil is correct, amiright?

---

It’s already been investigated. It’s a false accusation.

---

Scarborough's been investigated?  Source, or make believe?

---