Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore Cultivation Supplies

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |  [ show all ]
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: liquidlounge]
    #24825516 -

liquidlounge said:
redgreenvines said:
I may choose santa clause over science if he does not get his shit together, and hurry up already.



I like this. :yesnod:



5 fucking years, Uncertainty Principle some of them hellish years. Down the drain or amazing stuff about to come my way???


--------------------
As far as I assume to know...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: liquidlounge]
    #24825684 -

Why does Carl Schmitt think that science is about truth?  And why does he care so much about facts?  Those two ideas are bastions of a closed mind.  Science is about observations and models.  Truth and facts are best left to the mystics who have it all figured out already.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #24826257 -

OrgoneConclusion said:
Yes, those Hubble deep field photographs are real wonder killers.



erf is flet.


--------------------
"I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay… small acts of kindness and love.” - Gandalf The Grey.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

"I like to think of Jesus like with giant eagle's wings, and singin' lead vocals for Lynyrd Skynyrd with like an angel band and I'm in the front row and I'm HAMMERED DRUNK!" - Cal Naughton Jr. AKA The Magic Man. Abracadabra homes!

"Each tear is a drop of poison released." - Anonymous

"Could it be you're afraid of what your friends might say if they knew you believe in God above? They should realize before they criticize that God is the only way to Love."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: liquidlounge]
    #24827420 -

liquidlounge said:
liquidlounge said:
redgreenvines said:
I may choose santa clause over science if he does not get his shit together, and hurry up already.



I like this. :yesnod:



5 fucking years, Uncertainty Principle some of them hellish years. Down the drain or amazing stuff about to come my way???



Stop thinking about Santa so he can manifest, damn it! :pipesmoke:


--------------------
"Take it easy, dude. But TAKE it!" - Terence McKenna

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #24827889 -

Scientists are like modern magicians. They always try to predict and prove that what not exists (yet, or anymore) :beatup:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: BlueCoyote]
    #24828036 -

I never got my flying car


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: redgreenvines]
    #24828200 -

That woman I met today is nice, make it work FFS! :heart::tongue:


--------------------
As far as I assume to know...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: redgreenvines]
    #24828278 -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: BlueCoyote]
    #24829639 -

BlueCoyote said:
Scientists are like modern magicians. They always try to predict and prove that what not exists (yet, or anymore) :beatup:



That is most certainly not true.


--------------------
As lightless oblivion devours you, drown in the ever-blooming darkness.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: Thanatos10]
    #24829720 -

BlueCoyote said:
Scientists are like modern magicians. They always try to predict and prove that what not exists (yet, or anymore) :beatup:



This guy gets it.

Thanatos10 said:
BlueCoyote said:
Scientists are like modern magicians. They always try to predict and prove that what not exists (yet, or anymore) :beatup:



That is most certainly not true.



With material positivists pushing scientism dogma as free inquiry of the unfolding of nature, it's most certainly true.


--------------------
"Take it easy, dude. But TAKE it!" - Terence McKenna

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: Thanatos10]
    #24829761 -

Thanatos10 said:
BlueCoyote said:
Scientists are like modern magicians. They always try to predict and prove that what not exists (yet, or anymore) :beatup:



That is most certainly not true.



It obviously is.
Predictions are about the future -> not exist
Recreations of the past -> not exist

It's an ironic view, of course, but it can be seen that way.
That place magicians or religious leader took in society to create our worldview before science, scientists have taken now.
The predictions of scientists are only true with 100% controlled conditions. Which in nature rarely happen.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: BlueCoyote]
    #24829823 -

BlueCoyote said:
Thanatos10 said:
BlueCoyote said:
Scientists are like modern magicians. They always try to predict and prove that what not exists (yet, or anymore) :beatup:



That is most certainly not true.



It obviously is.
Predictions are about the future -> not exist
Recreations of the past -> not exist

It's an ironic view, of course, but it can be seen that way.
That place magicians or religious leader took in society to create our worldview before science, scientists have taken now.
The predictions of scientists are only true with 100% controlled conditions. Which in nature rarely happen.



Again, also not true. Scientists aren’t like modern magicians. The future and the past technically exist, since replication is a thing and science can do it pretty well you can say the “past” exists. Scientific predictions about what will happen are reliable enough to act upon so the future technically does exist.

Nothing at all like magicians, and it cannot be seen that way without some logical leaps and a lack of understanding of how science works.

If you say science has taken the place of magicians and religion then you really are out of the loop.

Science shows that if you know the factors at work you can make accurate predictions, same thing in nature. All that is missing is the information, which we might not always have. But considering how well science has worked I would say your point is moot.


--------------------
As lightless oblivion devours you, drown in the ever-blooming darkness.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: Thanatos10]
    #24829910 -

" The future and the past technically exist"
Sorry, wrong again. That is what science tries to tell us. Technically is a scientific word.

Future and the past, by definition don't exist in the now.

I will repeat,
it's an ironic (edit: exaggerated) view, of course, but it can be seen that way.
That place magicians or religious leader took in society to create our worldview before science, scientists have taken now.
The predictions of scientists are only true with 100% controlled conditions. Which in nature rarely happen.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: BlueCoyote]
    #24829928 -

But they do exist in the now, and neuroscience is pretty much confirmation of that (with humans not having libertarian free will).


--------------------
As lightless oblivion devours you, drown in the ever-blooming darkness.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: OrgoneConclusion] * 1
    #24829938 -

I geuss all the phenomena labeled under magic is just natural states that have yet to be tangibly observed and identified.Ya know All animals before they became classified where !monsters!.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: Thanatos10]
    #24829945 -

Lol, no. The now is influenced by the past and the now influences the future, but both are practically, physically, really not here (in the) now...

(Of course I know they are related, but...)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: BlueCoyote]
    #24829956 -

Quote:
BlueCoyote said:The predictions of scientists are only true with 100% controlled conditions. Which in nature rarely happen.



Where does this idea come from?  The theory of gravity predicts that if I throw a rock up with human strength, it will come back down.  Simple.  There are plenty of scientific predictions made in uncontrolled conditions.

Scientists predicted the last eclipse.  That was a 0% controlled condition with an event happening in that moment we had no control over.  Not of the event or extraneous actors.

Using empiricism and models, I predict tonight the sun will set earlier in the northern hemisphere than the southern hemisphere.  0% controlled conditions.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: DieCommie]
    #24829965 -

DieCommie said:
Quote:
BlueCoyote said:The predictions of scientists are only true with 100% controlled conditions. Which in nature rarely happen.



Where does this idea come from?  The theory of gravity predicts that if I throw a rock up with human strength, it will come back down.  Simple.  There are plenty of scientific predictions made in uncontrolled conditions.

Scientists predicted the last eclipse.  That was a 0% controlled condition with an event happening in the moment.

Using empiricism and models, I predict tonight the sun will set earlier in the northern hemisphere than the southern hemisphere.  0% controlled conditions.



That's true. Controlled conditions include the conditions we know about and which will stay (most probably) the same.
The term stems from laboratory experiments.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: BlueCoyote]
    #24830026 -

why are scientists not like modern day magicians?
they study what others avoid (hence esoteric 'wisdom')
they earn their money working for sponsors while trying to capture and enslave new jinns (genies, miracles, natural laws)


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why science sucks! [Re: redgreenvines]
    #24830048 -

I think, I just hint on the similar mental influence, those systems have on our perception of the world in some similar ways.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |  [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore Cultivation Supplies


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The Limitations of Science
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Anonymous 7,604 85 01/22/04 02:17 AM
by trippy
* "Convenient" Commingling of Science Terms
( 1 2 3 all )
Swami 4,187 44 02/13/12 04:02 AM
by OrgoneConclusion
* spiritual beings, otherworldly presences.. and your encounters with them
( 1 2 all )
ShroomismM 4,556 38 10/02/05 04:55 AM
by Silversoul
* Work Sucks... Huehuecoyotl 1,334 16 03/06/05 05:11 PM
by Huehuecoyotl
* Science as a vice
( 1 2 3 all )
ShroomismM 3,000 41 11/25/04 10:13 PM
by Mixomatosis
* The science of social interaction.
( 1 2 all )
Larrythescaryrex 2,626 23 01/16/03 08:50 AM
by sirreal
* On Jewish Science, & Gentile Holocaust luciferhorus 1,271 8 05/20/05 10:09 PM
by Huehuecoyotl
* Is Science a form of Mythology?
( 1 2 3 all )
Adamist 4,783 52 01/23/03 03:21 PM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
6,679 topic views. 3 members, 12 guests and 28 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.015 seconds on 18 queries.