blewmeanie said: Its all temporary, with or without religion. You're attracted to pleasurable things and repelled by the painful for a reason. Things that support the propagation of your own genes and maintaining your own existence are pleasurable due to millions of years of meticulous natural selection. The inverse is true for painful experiences. You've evolved with an aversion for experiences that are harmful for you, or for the continuity of your own genetic makeup. However indulging in the extreme of either impulse tends to be unhealthy, and leads to unhappiness. Sugar is a really good example of this. The experience of eating sugar is very pleasurable because its a dense form of energy that's extremely easy for your body to process and put to use, however in excess it leads to obesity, and possibly cancer; both things that will make you unhappy.
Even that sense of lacking something that's within all of us has is usefulness. It keeps us pushing forward seeking the pleasurable and avoiding the painful, that is to say, it encourages behavior that is favorable for the propagation of your genes.
I don't agree, or at least I am not going to accept this without proof. The sense of lack does not keep me pushing forward, it often leads me to apathy and behavior that is not favorable for the propagation of my genes. On the contrary, I would be much more likely to propagate my genes if I had a higher baseline mood. When I feel whole is when I am able to truly engage in life and express my genes.
But I think this is all beside the point. The point I want to discuss is that we all tend to think that we should be concerned with seeking out good things and avoiding bad things and its by being successful at this that we become happy. Religion on the other hand (and by religion here I mean Christianit, Buddhism and Hinduism because they are the only ones I have studied enough to speak about), teaches that we become happy by giving up the stupid game of trying to make ourselves happy, especially through sensory pleasures which it says are simply temporary. Giving up the idea that we have a self we ought to be concerned about pleasing and instead it tells us that we can be just as happy giving as receiving. I am probably not doing the best job explaining this, but the point is that what these religions tell us about happiness, is very much at odds with the common sense view and our normal ways of thinking. And yet, in my experience, it rings true.
Quote: Its all temporary, with or without religion.
I am not sure I agree with this. All phenomenological experiences are temporary including emotional experiences, but in my experience it is possible to cultivate a focused form of awareness that is both peaceful and enduring. It is easy to allow oneself to become distracted by the allure of some pleasure, or the fear of some ill, and in the early stages, this will cause you to lose that peace that comes from simply being aware but without wanting this or that or fearing this or that and simply being right along with what is. So, as humans we have the option to attempt to cultivate that inner peace, or to seek he pleasures of the world. Its very hard to do both at the same time, which is why we must choose one. After spending a long time seeking the pleasures of the world, I realized that I was happier when cultivating inner peace.
Quote: Your life is just one link in a chain running through time and connected with all other chains at multiple links along the way. If you understand it and play your part the burden of it all lightens, and life gets much easier.
|