Seuss said:

but I have yet to find somebody that is left leaning that is able to distance their own opinion from the duties of moderation.  If you guys have suggestions, I am all ears, but remember, it is a very difficult job.  Censorship works both ways!

---

Zouden, Evan or Supernovasky would be great Left-Leaning mod candidates IMHO, also they don't seem like the type that would abuse power, never seen any of them flame

Gastronomicus said:

I'd stand behind any of those three choices.

---

Me too!


Zap and I would end up Perma-Banned and set free from this Addiction!

Luddite said:

Islam, being a mental illness, is why Palestine has declined, not because of Israel.

---

too true. but then some would say that about other world religions...

it's a double edged sword i suppose.

Seuss said:

I've noticed a lot of people talking about using the ignore feature.  Great!

---

lonestar2004 said:

Gastronomicus said:

I'd stand behind any of those three choices.

---

Me too!


Zap and I would end up Perma-Banned and set free from this Addiction!

---

Yeah but then Poli D would be boring as fuck. There'd be no lesser minds to awaken to the glories of Liberalism

Quote:

On Banning: ...

        * Repeat offenders who continue to violate policy and/or administrative direction, will be permanently banned.
        * Every user may contest their ban through our Support System. Please include any and all relevant information and links where applicable. While we reserve the right to allow certain users readmittance, do not expect to be given a second chance if you have been perm banned.

---

Quote:

Post Whores are those who create multiple posts of little or no content, which fail to contribute to the topic at hand, or whom create multiple threads in rapid succession, in effect "flooding" a forum. Post Whores may or may not engage in such behavior to intentionally drive up their post count.

---

Quote:

When someone gets on the bad side of the community and continues to act out, bringing the wrath of our more vocal members upon themselves and generally becoming a detriment to the health and harmony of the boards, they will be processed in accordance with the On Banning guidelines above."

---

Quote:

There are three posters who get more shit thrown at them for their views than any others - zappaisgod, Lonestar, and Luddite. An objective review of the forum makes that abundantly clear.

---

Quote:

If he posts off-topic stuff, I (or Diploid or maybe even Seuss) will move it to a different forum again.

---

Quote:

As of yet, the Powers That Be have not decided that threads started by a post with a cut-and-paste quote with no accompanying commentary from the thread starter are to be locked if caught before discussion by respondents ensues. The deal is that only bare links and bare videos warrant insta-locking.

Did Luddite just slap a URL or a video with no commentary of his own? Nope. He cut-and-pasted commentary from a source, then provide a link back to the source (as is required by the forum rules for cut-and-pastes), and neglected to add commentary of his own.

If y'all want to whine that this is a technicality, take it up in Website Announcements and Feedback. I get paid the big bucks to enforce the rules as written.

---