Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | < Back | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | Next > | Last >
Invisibleniteowl
GrandPaw
Male User Gallery


Registered: 07/01/03
Posts: 16,291
Loc: Flag
Re: Drug Legality Poll [Re: tpihkal]
    #8358592 - 05/03/08 06:08 PM (15 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

bad poll, choices are way too limited.





How are the choices too limited.

Either you agree with prohibition or you don't.

Pretty simple poll if you ask me.


--------------------
Live for the moment you are in now
Don't be bogged down by your past
Don't be afraid of what lies in your future


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineGrok
Has Been a Bad Boy
 User Gallery


Registered: 12/03/03
Posts: 1,262
Loc: Greener Pastures Flag
Last seen: 9 years, 4 months
Re: Drug Legality Poll [Re: niteowl]
    #8414529 - 05/17/08 09:04 PM (15 years, 8 months ago)

I got to page 10 and skipped the rest, so I don't know if this was addressed. Diploid, I highly doubt that given the option right now, 33% of the shroomery population would take it upon themselves to incarcerate you as you so adamantly claim. Just because something is or 'should be' illegal doesn't mean that you should or do go to jail. I've been caught with schedule 1 drugs and I never went to jail, even though the people who caught me were much less compassionate towards my situation than the average shroomerite would be. Maybe 'illegal' means you'll get a ticket, probation, a spanking, or in a judicial system with a rational sense of proportion, you'd have to see a doctor to make sure that you were well informed and responsible enough to use drugs.

I guarantee that a fair supply of drugs purchased for legal use would find their way to irresponsible, uninformed people from all walks of life. Face it, a substantial percentage of the drug-using population -- that already has no problem breaking the law to use drugs -- isn't going to have trouble sleeping at night by breaking the law to sell them to uninformed, irresponsible persons from all walks of life. Undoubtedly, this group of people would have greater access to the drugs 'we' try to keep them away from if they were made legal for other people to take. Straightforward economics. It would be too resource-intense to be properly regulated such a system, unless you taxed the hell out of 'legal' drugs, but you could only do that so far as they were a better value than street drugs. How would you punish such offenders? Oh yeah, they're responsible and would never even contemplate such actions.

This is such a complex topic, you'd need a major thinktank (and a lot of drugs) to really cover all the angles. But,

So long as being "responsible" means that legal drug users would never divert their supply to irresponsible and uninformed drug users, and their drug use doesn't negatively impact the lives of others or society as a whole (absolutely nobody should have to subsidize other people's recreational use of drugs nor any negative impacts they have on users lives -- similar to my stance that universal healthcare, if ever implemented, should not cover problems relating to smoking, eating shitty food, etc), then I don't see the problem with

Quote:


Without exception, all drugs should be LEGAL for informed, responsible adults to use in the privacy of their own home.




Except that the conditions outlined above are completely unrealistic.

And except, that as an empire/nation/entity, which exists through the productivity of its members, it is perhaps arguable that our functioning as an empire/nation could decline if all responsible, well-informed drug users just sat in their homes and did drugs. Maybe this isn't something that matters, and I withhold my own opinion on the matter...just something to consider.


--------------------
Entropy is increasing.
To send me a PM, go to my journal


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDiploidM
Cuban


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 19,274
Loc: Rabbit Hole
Re: Drug Legality Poll [Re: Grok]
    #8433840 - 05/22/08 05:25 PM (15 years, 8 months ago)

Just because something is or 'should be' illegal doesn't mean that you should or do go to jail. I've been caught with schedule 1 drugs and I never went to jail

Get caught a second or third time then get back to me on that. Even parking tickets will eventually land you in a government cage if you accumulate enough of them.

Oh, and nevermind the felony record that comes on the second or third time that summarily excludes you from ever having a job that will pay enough to allow you to so much as buy a house or save for retirement.


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineh o f m a n n
I think, therefore, I am.
Male


Registered: 05/17/08
Posts: 33
Last seen: 15 years, 18 days
Re: Drug Poll [Re: im_on_a_boat]
    #8450424 - 05/27/08 12:41 PM (15 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

drkrobotnik said:
god didn't make meth.




I don't believe in god, but if you do and you believe he's created everything around us, then yes he did create meth. Meth has been found in a species or two of trees down in Texas.


--------------------
fuxxxorzz


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleWhiskeyClone
Not here
Male User Gallery

Registered: 06/25/01
Posts: 16,509
Loc: Longitudinal Center of Canada ...
Re: Drug Poll [Re: h o f m a n n]
    #8450747 - 05/27/08 02:13 PM (15 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

h o f m a n n said:
Meth has been found in a species or two of trees down in Texas.




We're gonna need a source on that one.


--------------------
Welcome evermore to gods and men is the self-helping man.  For him all doors are flung wide: him all tongues greet, all honors crown, all eyes follow with desire.  Our love goes out to him and embraces him, because he did not need it.

~ R.W. Emerson, "Self-Reliance"

:heartpump:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDiploidM
Cuban


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 19,274
Loc: Rabbit Hole
Re: Drug Poll [Re: WhiskeyClone]
    #8451382 - 05/27/08 05:04 PM (15 years, 8 months ago)

Wiki:

Methamphetamine occurs naturally in Acacia berlandieri and possibly Acacia rigidula, trees which grow in west Texas. Acacia trees contain numerous other psychoactive compounds (ex.amphetamine, mescaline, nicotine, DMT, ...[24]), but scientific papers specifically mentioning the presence of methamphetamine did not exist until 1997 and 1998.[25]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methamphetamine


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDiploidM
Cuban


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 19,274
Loc: Rabbit Hole
Re: Drug Poll [Re: Diploid]
    #8451385 - 05/27/08 05:06 PM (15 years, 8 months ago)

Also, Ask Dr. Shulgin:

What caught my curiosity immediately was the casual indifference shown to what is certainly an extraordinary discovery. Here, amongst some 40 or so alkaloids found in each of these two species, there were five amphetamines that had heretofore been thought to be inventions of man. Two of these are Schedule II drugs, Amphetamine and Methamphetamine. Two are Schedule I drugs, N,N-Dimethylamphetamine and 4-Methoxyamphetamine. And the fifth one is a major human metabolite of Amphetamine, 4-Hydroxyamphetamine. To my knowledge, none of these had ever before been reported as being natural plant alkaloids. This unprecedented discovery elicited only a passing line of comment in the earlier of the two papers.

http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/shulgin/adsarchive/acacia.htm


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAegentMonty
Stranger?
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/03/08
Posts: 147
Loc: Oregon
Last seen: 15 years, 6 months
Re: Drug Poll [Re: Diploid]
    #8454015 - 05/28/08 05:28 AM (15 years, 8 months ago)

Could you have a license to possess and use various drugs?

So for meth as an example, you would go down to a place like the DMV and take a meth test. You would have to know about what meth is how it works, and the negative aspects of it. Then you would get a license.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleWhiskeyClone
Not here
Male User Gallery

Registered: 06/25/01
Posts: 16,509
Loc: Longitudinal Center of Canada ...
Re: Drug Poll [Re: Diploid]
    #8454133 - 05/28/08 06:50 AM (15 years, 8 months ago)

Thanks for verifying.


--------------------
Welcome evermore to gods and men is the self-helping man.  For him all doors are flung wide: him all tongues greet, all honors crown, all eyes follow with desire.  Our love goes out to him and embraces him, because he did not need it.

~ R.W. Emerson, "Self-Reliance"

:heartpump:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleCDS
 User Gallery


Registered: 09/05/08
Posts: 301
Loc: Grey Area
Re: Drug Legality Poll [Re: Diploid]
    #8998109 - 09/28/08 01:44 PM (15 years, 4 months ago)

Bottom line, all drugs will be available whether they are legal or not!

Legalizing them would allow the government to tax them, guarentee their purity, cut down on crime related to the illegal sale and trafficing (domestic and intl) thereof, and free up millions of jail cells and billions of dollars spent housing non-violent drug offenders.

Then, instead of letting Tyrone get out of jail early on a nickel ADW rap due to overcrowding, he can do his whole bit- and keep his ex-neighbors safe for that much longer...

The War on Drugs is a fucking joke. The other side will always have unlimited funds to throw at the problem; while we (the US) have a federal budget that we must adhere to that doesn't even come close. As long as there is demand, there will always be a supply- that is a fundamental law of economics. Regardless of the cost, there will always be both a supply and a demand for drugs. (At least until humanity reaches a mental and spiritual level of evolution that allows us to transcend the physical world and with it the pleasures and pressures of everyday life- which is at least 1000 years off IMFO)

Bottom line, all drugs will be available whether they are legal or not! The government might as well profit off it while at the same time make the country that much safer for that many reasons.

Thank You, and FUCK the politicians and FUCK the DEA! :smile:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleCDS
 User Gallery


Registered: 09/05/08
Posts: 301
Loc: Grey Area
Re: Drug Poll [Re: WhiskeyClone]
    #8998119 - 09/28/08 01:46 PM (15 years, 4 months ago)

Quote:

WhiskeyClone said:
Quote:

h o f m a n n said:
Meth has been found in a species or two of trees down in Texas.




We're gonna need a source on that one.




They must put meth in their chronic down there then, hehe.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleEntheogenicPeace
Scholar
Male


Registered: 10/04/05
Posts: 3,926
Re: Drug Poll [Re: CDS]
    #8998908 - 09/28/08 04:42 PM (15 years, 4 months ago)

---


Edited by EntheogenicPeace (01/01/18 02:04 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleEntropymancer
 User Gallery
Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 10,207
Re: Drug Poll [Re: EntheogenicPeace]
    #8998979 - 09/28/08 04:59 PM (15 years, 4 months ago)

Not sure whether it was answered earlier, but methamphetamine has been found in a couple species of Acacia. The literature citations are PHYTOCHEM. (1998), 49(5), 1377 and PHYTOCHEM. (1997), 46(2), 249.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineShroomSlave
Stranger

Registered: 05/16/09
Posts: 1
Last seen: 14 years, 6 months
Re: Drug Legality Poll [Re: im_on_a_boat]
    #10349779 - 05/16/09 06:33 PM (14 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

drkrobotnik said:
who's going to determine if they are physiologically addictive?

alcohol is physiologically addictive..  should that be regulated by the government too?

i really dont think making drugs available to the masses is a good idea (not an attack at you omni just personal opinion)  for many obvious reasons.

i believe decriminalization of said substances might be a little more effective.. but it's illegal everywhere else in the world.. why should it be legal in the united states?  we are supposed to be a beacon of morality and truth for the entire world to follow :tongue: (sarcasm) but seriously.  it's just not going to happen.

plus i dont want most drugs to be legal.  then any dumbass motherfucker can do them and think they are the shit. instead of just us thinking we are the shit.



We are one in the same.http://www.shroomery.org/forums/images/icons/yin_yang.gif


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinekileshaper
Stranger
Registered: 05/19/09
Posts: 1
Last seen: 14 years, 8 months
Re: Drug Legality Poll [Re: Veritas]
    #10368069 - 05/20/09 03:23 AM (14 years, 8 months ago)

Very well put veritas!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLuvadaCybin
Stranger

Registered: 06/28/09
Posts: 15
Last seen: 14 years, 6 months
Re: Drug Legality Poll [Re: Diploid]
    #10659052 - 07/11/09 04:15 PM (14 years, 6 months ago)

I havent read a single post that makes sense here. The fact of the matter is that whether you think its addictive or not, right or wrong, immoral or moral, freedom comes first. If you want to ruin your life with meth crack or heroin, thats your right, and you should be allowed to do it without the government intervening. Its not the governments job to save people from themselves, its the job of their higher selves. if they cant hear or allow that presence to guide them, then they are of no use to mankind. Drug laws have nothing to do with preservation of life. They are strictly about money and control. thats all you need to know to make a rational opinion about the matter. Im surprised so many people on a shroom forum can have such a closed minded opinion. Hopefully i helped someone with that but probably not.


--------------------
Ya know, there is a good bit of wisdom out there; gold nuggets if you will. But in between, sometimes you need dick and fart jokes. Try this one on.  Whats the difference between jelly and jam? I cant jelly my cock down your throat.
namaste


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMichiaelJackson
Cynic
 User Gallery

Registered: 06/27/09
Posts: 175
Last seen: 14 years, 4 months
Re: Drug Legality Poll [Re: LuvadaCybin]
    #10659139 - 07/11/09 04:36 PM (14 years, 6 months ago)

drugs good. haters bad. I'll write my dissertation later.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMichiaelJackson
Cynic
 User Gallery

Registered: 06/27/09
Posts: 175
Last seen: 14 years, 4 months
Re: Drug Poll [Re: opensaysme]
    #10661035 - 07/11/09 11:10 PM (14 years, 6 months ago)

After reading this entire thread, I find it difficult to keep my emotions at bay. However, it is important that emotions be left at the proverbial door. From this standpoint, it may well seem as though my wordings come off as cold, harsh, or otherwise mean spirited. I assure you that I mean no ill will or offer any sort of malicious intent, I intend only to speak the truth. I may pick on any and all of you indiscriminately, and only hope you would do the same for me.

Firs off, this thread has more tangents than my last three trig exams. I would like to back into my first point gently, unfortunately my other arguments rest strongly on the fundamentals from it. If you are easy to be offended, I suggest to stop reading here. If not, please continue; be careful, the first step is a doozy.

What about the children or what about the people who abuse or what about the consequences of non users from users

I would like to pick on Gumbi for this point, due to 1. I think he can take it, 2. He shows the example well, 3. last and definitely least, he called me a hooker.
While I fully understand your compassion for other entities and their welfare, you need to leave it at the door. your woes about someone else's well being stops rational thought. I strongly suggest a strong dose of apathy with your morning cup or coffee (or meth, or pot, or whatever). When you are able to make the choice of not caring, you have made the choice of being able to see situations without allowing your emotions to get involved.

At the heart of compassion is not just caring, but being able to make a difference in the well being of others. It is too easy to get wrapped up in the urgency of the emotionalality of a situation where anyone is suffering. Unfortunately, most situations involve suffering and dram follows criminals. Don't let your caring for other people stop you from helping them. By that I mean, don't let your knee jerk compasionate thoughts take over the rational part of thinking (which emotions tend to do) to not be able to come to a rational solution that will fix those problems. The fear of change is great, the fear of understand change is greater, the fear of understanding that there will be suffering in this world both before and after change is almost insurmountable. Please, lets not wuss out before the fights even begun.

If you want to help another man and I mean truly help them, teach him how to fish and don't cry about him going to bed hungry.

God didn't make 'fubar' so it should be illegal or psychadelics should be legal for spiritual growth or any other arguments founded on 'god' or 'spirituality' or otherwise transcendent being/forces/whatever

Please, for the love of your being, keep god out of your drugs!
For those of you who are religious/spiritual/have an imaginary friend: Either of 2 situations about your beliefs are true:
1. God created life. Therefore God created man. Therefore all man made objects are created from god.
2. God didn't create life/man/all drugs.

In either of these instances, either god made all drugs or he made no drugs. No one drug gets a waiver from god. Cope.

For those of you who use drugs for spiritual purposes:
Keep it to yourself, or at least out of the 'drug legalization' arguments. This is all about motive.

(This next part is going to fly over like a lead balloon with the mushy crowd. Sorry guys, its true.)
I like to get high. I do drugs to get high. If you like to do drugs for spiritual purposes, people assume (me included) that you are too much of a pussy to admit that you like getting high. True or not, trying to slip in on the religious front makes you look dishonest and disingenuous.

Lets look at the similarities between you 'having a spiritual time' and me 'getting high'.
1. When I get high, I feel good.
2. When you have a 'spiritual time', you feel good.
Please note that when I say 'good' I mean that we have gained value from the experience that we chose to have.

Please don't tell people that you use drugs for spiritual purposes in order to soften the blow of you liking to choose chemical induced experiences. For someone who is steadfast against your position you come off as a douche bag used car salesmen who doesn't have the conviction to say that he enjoys getting high. When talking to any person who is opposed to recreational drug use, there are only a few possible senarios.
1. you say 'drug' and 'spiritual' in the same paragraph and...
a. They hear 'drug' and 'high' in the same paragraph and stop listening.
b. They hear 'drug' and 'high' in the same paragraph and think you're too much of a pussy to admit that you like getting high and therefore think you are a liar. See (a).
2. You say 'drug' and 'high in the same paragraph and...
a. They hear 'drug' and 'high' in the same paragraph and stop listening.
b. They hear 'drug' and 'high' in the same paragraph and at least think you're man enough to admit that you like getting high.

Of those 4 senarios, the only one in which has any reasonable chance of getting someone else to respect your right to get 'high' is 2b. This argument isn't for having people think that its okay for someone else to do a chemical recreationaly, this argument is to have everyone respect our right to do with our bodies as we see fit.

Seriously, keep god out of your drug discussions if you want to keep god in your drugs.

I have a friend that... (did stupid thing, usually) or I've done/did/have been addicted to (substance) or I have witnessed (insert atrocity here)

Great. No one believes you. Well, I don't believe you at least, and no one else should either. Why?
1. People lie.
2. People exaggerate.
3. Even if it is honest to goodness truth, I probably still don't give a damn.

Most of these anecdotes are nothing more than thinly veiled argumentum ad populum (Argument to the sentiment, aka. tugging on the heart strings). This is a logical fallacy that has plagued mankind for milenia. As I said earlier, leave your emotion at the door. If you try and convince me that my chemical usage causes domestic violence/criminal behavior/malice/kids to starve in etheopia you get...
1. disdain
2. loss of respect for trying to use an utterly fallacious argument.

Seriously, I am aware that the black market (which does business with illegal chemicals) causes suffering. You telling me that you have have seen a pimp beat up a hooker brings NOTHING to the table (sorry Gumbi).

Absolute certainty

It doesn't exist. Cope.

While this thread doesn't seem horribly rife with these sorts of arguments, I have seen in my day quite a few arguments that break down to...
I will agree if...
1. You can prove that is exactly what will happen
2. This will end all of our problems

Guess what, scientists don't "know" much of anything. Thats a mathmatitions job. Nobody knows much of anything with 100% certainty (other than self exists, and data is data) and there is no golden bullet for any problem.

methodologial naturalism (read: the scientific method) has gotten us from beating each others brains out with rocks to blowing each other up with abhrams tanks in a few short centuries. We accomplished all this without knowing shit for absolute certainty. We can get through this, it'll be just peachy.

I don't like (substance) so it should be illegal

I hate the color purple. Hate is too nice of a word, I loathe it. The sight of the color makes me wretch in disgust. A guy who I work with drives a purple car. It saddens me as a human being that anyone would choose to drive a vehicle of that color.

Guess what? Too fucking bad for me. Too bad for you too.

I could spout proverbs all day long involving kitchenware and other peoples junk. Quite frankly (and this is really really important) you as a human being have absolutely no more right to tell me what to do than I have to tell you what to do. The second I get to tell you what clothes to wear every day you get to tell me what I get to ingest and what state of mind I am allowed to be in.

I honestly don't give a damn if I do something that you don't agree with. I don't really give a damn if you do something I don't agree with either; I have and regularly exercise my choice to remove myself from that stimulus. It's fine if you don't like what I do, there is no need to be a bitch about it.

Over abundant use of logical fallacies

I'm going to pick on Diploid for a second here, but I will mention other fallacies that have been used as well.

Diploid, seriously, you're fighting the good fight but you got to knock it off with the non sequitur/ad homm attacks. On at least two occasions you have spouted off what amounts to...
"Of course you would say that, you're just touting the DARE pledge."
1. Even if someone is touting the company slogan to a "T", that does not infer that they have been "fed bullshit from the man". It may very well be their opinion through their own research, experience, and belief system. To assume anything less is presumptuous, insulting, bad form, and most importantly logically fallacious.
2. Arguing the person via presuming the person based on their argument doesn't do anyone any justice. If its a similar enough argument that has been thwarted before, feel free to be lazy and quote yourself or others. Argue their arguments, not them.

In all seriousness Diploid, I respect your thoughts and arguments and agree with them thoroughly. Leave your emotions at the door and don't let them interfere with your ability to think and express yourself rationally. Take a chill pill if you need to (and pass one over here while you're at it).

Some other oft used logical fallacys: post hoc ergo propter hoc, cum hoc ergo propter hoc, (converse) fallacy of accident, etc.

Also, try not to be a presumptuous ass. In my interpretation of some of the above posts I believe that Diploid does not in fact do meth. Presuming that he does because he once said the word 'need' in a post and then attacking him about his 'problem' would lead a reasonable man to affirm that he does (even if he doesn't) just to show that his viewpoint is unwaivering based on which chemical he is referring to. Well, that and all of your undocumented personal affairs I believe to be complete bullshit anyhow.

Some lose ends + other bitches

Quote:

Hopi said:
...but other side in me is just screaming, "People are too stupid to use drugs responsibly! Don't let them!"




Sorry to break it to you homie, but you're 'average joe', just like me. We should turn ourselves in to the police for doing stupid and illegal activities. You first.

Quote:

opensaysme said:
I'm going to vote Ron Paul, but a feel it may be a throw away vote....




I pray on everything good that you followed through. I hear way too many people complain that they want 'change' in their government but continue to vote down the same damn party line under the guise of "I'de rather have (x) than (y) as (politician)". For anyone who voted for someone other than who they thought would do the best job as president I have only this to say. Quit being a pussy and dragging down the rest of the country with your lack of conviction. You are the reason why we haven't had a non bipartisan presidential leader in my lifetime. Grow a spine and support that which you believe in. In death I have only my good name, in life I have only my convictions.

Conclusion

There are some of you I agree with, and some of you I don't agree with. As long as you believe what you believe, you deserve nothing but respect.

For those of you who disagree with my stance, I hope that you will be highly critical of my thoughts and that one day we may dissuade each other.

For those of you who agree with me, keep fighting the good fight and keep fighting it good. None of us can do this alone, but all of us may be able to.

For everyone: Just chill out, you're not getting out of life alive.


--------------------
Wanna hear something depressing? One out of four Shroomerites wants to lock me in a government cage for using a substance they don't like.

Hard to believe, right? Read it for yourself:

http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/7874721#Post7874721


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDiploidM
Cuban


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/09/03
Posts: 19,274
Loc: Rabbit Hole
Re: Drug Poll [Re: MichiaelJackson]
    #10663227 - 07/12/09 01:37 PM (14 years, 6 months ago)

Diploid, seriously, you're fighting the good fight but you got to knock it off with the non sequitur/ad homm attacks.

I hear you my friend, but you've only been here a few days. Talk to me again after a few years of arguing with people who have more in common with fundamentalist Muslims who want to inflict their religion on me by force (read: put me in jail at the point of a gun so I conform to their idea of which chemical I should ingest) than with free thinkers, and you'll start flinging ad hominems and logical fallacies too.

Or maybe not. In any case, welcome to the Shroomery. I hope you stick around.


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinetripp23
Kratom Freak
 User Gallery


Registered: 05/21/08
Posts: 4,030
Loc: Florida, US
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
Re: Drug Poll [Re: im_on_a_boat]
    #10663407 - 07/12/09 02:11 PM (14 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

drkrobotnik said:
god didn't make meth.




yes he did. all those chemicals required to make it were givin to us by god.. werent they.. meth is here for a reason and god helped make it as well.


--------------------
Experience my nightmarish first time of smoking Ganja!



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | < Back | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | Next > | Last >

Shop: PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* What happens when drugs are legalized? ( DEA arguments) Annom 2,101 4 09/08/04 03:42 PM
by BleaK
* I need good websites about drug policy, legalization, etc. thepodman 1,040 11 09/22/04 10:44 PM
by thepodman
* Drug Banners!
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )
EffedS 13,608 172 12/24/08 01:24 PM
by ltd
* Drugs are needed for our society to continue...
( 1 2 all )
DailyPot 6,153 23 03/06/17 09:13 PM
by triphead9428
* Drugs -- 25 years from now. 20? 10? 5? 1? adamj 921 8 10/02/04 10:00 PM
by F0SS1L
* Legalized drugs = crap?
( 1 2 all )
IAmTheWalrus212 4,263 30 05/03/11 08:36 PM
by Yacub
* The Rise in the Use of Hallucinogenic Drugs in the 1990s I_Fart_Blue 2,751 9 10/03/16 04:31 PM
by g00ru
* no more vavorite drug!!!!???? notapillow 852 10 12/15/03 07:11 PM
by The_Red_Crayon

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
65,940 topic views. 3 members, 30 guests and 33 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 15 queries.