MushroomTrip said:
Quote: That's where you're wrong. Humans produced different cultures for millions of years.
Ok, so what's your point here? Yes, humans produced different cultures, ALL of them according to HUMAN NATURE. That unless you're speaking of some kind of alien conspiracy which shadow guided us according to their nature. And EVEN SO... just for the sake of the argument, if we followed and behaved accordingly it is because it is related to who we are. With other words you can't make a frog bark.  We only do things which resonate with aspects of our nature.
Quote: This one particular culture, centered around a myth that it's the "one" way for people to live, is just that; one culture.
This one meaning which? Humans DO have the right and possibility to choose. Those who consider that this (whatever you're talking about) is the only way to live, have these beliefs because of their choices.
Quote: It's a culture that spread out of control.
As opposed to which culture?  No matter how you twist it, it is in human nature to control. It resides in the nature of being alive. The simple fact that we choose between two types of foods is because we wish to control the quality of what we eat/drink/breathe. Perhaps you want to say that other cultures don't seem so desperate. This is something else and if you wanted to say that, then I agree with you up to a certain point which can be debatable but it is not of a direct concern for this topic. Self improvement seems to be in human nature too. I think that your perception is that you can't have both. What if it is in human nature to both fuck up AND self improve? And so much more!? Can YOU conceive what are the implications of that?
Quote: This culture we live in is not inevitable. It is not the destiny of humans.
And what is the destiny of humans? Do you believe that humans have a destiny? I don't  I think you're confusing human nature with destiny. And making use of a logical deduction here (correct me if I'm wrong), you seem to be pretty much convinced that it is not in human nature to fuck up, whilst it is in human nature to choose. So automatically you stated that it is in our destiny to choose:
Quote: It was and still is a choice.
Hmmm 
Quote: We as humanity lived differently for millions (loosely humanity) or hundreds of thousands (homo sapiens sapiens) of years.
And?... 
Quote: It's a choice. We just all forgot that it is.
Yeah everything is a choice. A possible chosen outcome from a multitude of them. ALL of them according to our nature. Unless you have other explanation such as....... (please fill in the blanks) How do you determine, trough what measurements and appreciations, what IS in human nature and what IS NOT in human nature?
You asked me what culture I'm talking about. I'm talking about a culture that says to itself "the world was made for man and man must conquer and rule it". I'm talking about a culture centered on an extremely labor intensive form of agriculture. This labor intensive agricultural system allowed massive surpluses, which allowed for huge population growth.
Before I go on I want to stress that there is nothing wrong with this style of agriculture. Any style of living is fine. There is no one right way for people to live. Different cultures had a huge variety of ways to live off the land, all ranging from pure hunting/gathering to pure agriculture. This one hit the extreme of pure agriculture.
What made this (our) culture unique and dangerous is that it put the idea into our heads that this is how man was meant to live. The power we had over the environment, which we gained at great cost, seemed only natural to us that this is how we should live. We have complete control over our food supply and so obviously (to them and thus us since we are the same culture) this is how we were meant to live. This is our destiny.
That vision of mankind aided by their style of agriculture is the culture I'm talking about. That culture is everywhere, both east and west. It is the vision that the world is meant for us and that we need to conquer it. It is the vision that we KNOW how to live and others do not.
In this way diversity has been crushed. There is now only one way to live in this world. Our population is out of control and we work everyday to supply food for it. This only makes our population grow bigger. Give a population more food than it needs and it will get bigger - every time. It's the most clearly established fact in all of ecology.
I digress. The point is that our culture self-perpetuated itself. It grew and it grew and it conquered and it conquered. It grew due to it's labor intensive agricultural style (which means population will grow, no matter what) and it spread because they (we) knew we were right. It only felt natural.
We as a culture decided this was the one way to live. We made that choice. It doesn't mean it was the correct choice. It also doesn't mean that we are flawed for making that choice. It was a bad choice and it is being self-corrected just like any other unstable biological strategy.
So where does Jesus come in? Jesus, and all the salvationist religions (all of the religions in the world) only arose because of our culture. The crushing lack of real diversity in lifestyles and the population explosion has created a world filled with problems. They don't remember that it was ever different so they believed that this is just -how it is-. They believe that this, our culture, IS humanity. They don't understand that this, our culture, is just that. Our culture. It is the culture of man trying to take over the world. Only that.
That's the key - people don't remember that it was and can be different. Everyone assumed that mankind started 10,000 years ago as totalitarian agriculturist civilization builders. Anything before that is regarded as "pre"-history, despite the fact that it was homo sapiens sapiens at the helm. The other 190,000 years are, for some reason, disregarded. They didn't live like us so they can't be humanity. Why not? Why is our last 10,000 years the ONLY right way to live?
Jesus taught us we needed saving. As did the teachings of Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism. They all teach salvation because we felt we needed it. Things weren't working and nobody remembered a time when things did work. Those times existed for 190,000 years at least. Millions more for our earlier homo ancestors. They worked that way for so long because they worked! That sounds circular but it isn't. There is no right or wrong for living. There is only what works. If it works it will continue. What worked continued for hundreds of thousands of years and only we, our culture, decided to take it upon ourselves to tell others how to live.
I'm not talking about America. I'm not talking about any nation or race. This is worldwide. We have decided we need to take over the world and every nation is trying to do that, whether they are rich or poor, black or white.
We don't need saving. We were fine just the way we were and still are. We are slowly awakening to the fact that we are the truthful antichrists, aware of our independence of any salvation.
|