Psychoactive1984 said:

http://www.nobeliefs.com

---

PhanTomCat said:

Why does this "struggle" seem to be so intense tonight....?  Is the end near....?   

In case it is, My love goes out to all that will feel it...

---

I'll feel it, and will continue to feel it... provided it isn't akin to god's love... as we've covered what "love" that strong can do .

The end is always near... as is the begining.

Psychoactive1984 said:

Have a goodnight.

I gave it a look through and it made as much sense to me as a Van Gogh does to a blindman.

If you have no set beliefs, you're just picking and choosing beliefs that support your liking.

---

Quote:

Your version of the beast is mere fantasy, and what is alluded to is contrived as far as I can tell.

---

Quote:

As it has no other basis then what you want to believe.

---

Quote:

You're more then entitled to your beliefs; but please don't argue one god If you are using multiple stances of him and incorporating your own philosophy, as the deviation is rather senseless.

---

MAGnum said:

Psychoactive1984 said:

Have a goodnight.

I gave it a look through and it made as much sense to me as a Van Gogh does to a blindman.

If you have no set beliefs, you're just picking and choosing beliefs that support your liking.

---

Good mornin'

The site is not full built yet and I have been busy working. I'll eventually finish it. I'm thinking of scrapping most of it and fixing it. There are actually plenty of Logical set beliefs there and I don't choose them according to "liking" but according to how it is. Like I said, the truth is out there and burried in a huge lumps of information, one must truly take all the lumps, refine the truth from them and connect them together from several sources. If science didn't have multiple sources of information like you say I shouldn't, would that make sence?

I've provided you with true scientific means of evaluation... yet for some reason you don't seem to give them the time of day. Sorry, science isn't one sided, it doesn't always work to your benefit... unless of course you've learned some archaic form that is unknown to me. The truth should be self evident in one volume, if you need outside sourcing, then the bible isn't sufficient enough to explain itself, in which case interpret it however you please; inasmuchas a student requires a Teacher to make sense of the knowledge... so to does the bible according to your belief need outside help... hence it's not proficient to the degree that it should be recognized as a teaching manual as it were.

Quote:

Your version of the beast is mere fantasy, and what is alluded to is contrived as far as I can tell.

---

I have had several visions. I suggest you read up on the Hopi prophecies who prophecied the swaztika (thier symbol of migration) being used as a symbol of war. And no, it is not reversed, it is the exact same symbol.

STOP! You do not know how to explain yourself. I suggest you get a dictionary and review the meaning of contrived. The underlined passage is enough to show me that... it is indeed contrived. I can have visions of a galactic cake spawning the solar system... and assert it's truth and correlate any religious document by way of my interpretation... nonetheless the galactic cake is contrived.

Quote:

As it has no other basis then what you want to believe.

---

Actually, the 666 means 6 for Globe, 6 for kingdom and 6 for unverse. Three symbols of divinity. Notice in the Bible, the book is writing directly to "He who has understanding."

Well, accordingly you do not have understanding unfortuanetly. Beyond that... no, the bible doesn't say that, provide me versus with explicit references. The number is one of man. I can give so many variations on the meaning of the number, I can give you a name with 3 p's at the end which would in fact be a number of man. As for instance with chemistry their are shells s, p, d, and f. Look it up, you'll see what I'm getting at. I can abstract the notion to the nth degree... the thing is that it is far too generalized and open to interpretation to make proper sense of it, which further allows self fulfilling prophecies.

Further, 6 in biblical terms is a number short of perfection-- that being imperfection. 5 is the number symbolic of man, and 7 is divine. I suggest you do some research before you attempt to debate with me.

Quote:

You're more then entitled to your beliefs; but please don't argue one god If you are using multiple stances of him and incorporating your own philosophy, as the deviation is rather senseless.

---

As I am free, you are free.

But, that makes no sence, my friend. In hinduism, I believe it is written that all of the Gods are reflections of the one true God. Also, Hinduism teaches that other, outside beliefs can be learned from. Again, if one wants to learn about something, one goes to as many sources as possible collecting information and deliberating it on thier own as I do. Not everything I believe in is written down and it is all rather scatterred on the website.

~Galactic Cake

---

SoopaX said:

I have a question that I'd like to direct mainly to people who call themselves "Christian", and have the basic belief that the only way to get into heaven is through accepting Jesus as your savior. Other comments are welcome, but it's that group that I'm wondering about. So, here goes;

If I can't accept Jesus as my "savior", or even the existance of God, due to the lack of any scientific proof of such, and I don't think that anything would cause me to accept them without real concrete proof, is it possible for me to get to heaven? One of the things I'm thinking, lets say that I knew that I was going to die in the immediate future. My mind might, in a fear reaction, begin to wonder about the after-life and decide that maybe I should just 'think' to my self "OK, I believe in God and Jesus, hes my savior". But God would certainly know that I didn't really believe it. So how does a person who is so science-minded accept the unprovable?

---