dinosaurs said:

FoolOfElysium said:

And for your own sake, so you don't get devoured by the metaphorical wolves in the new world, you should learn how to have a real dialogue with someone that doesn't see eye-to-eye with you.

---

I'm fine with people that dont see eye to eye with me, fool.  my objection to your support of fascism and pedophilia is quite a bit more than a difference of opinion on which sports team is going to win the big game.  I don't think you've considered what you're going to do when this maga fever dream ends, and you naively think you're going to float above it all in the meantime.

---

FoolOfElysium said:

christopera said:

You’re living in a dreamworld, Fool. You managed to gaslight yourself.

---

You tell me to put up or shut up, but apparently you're the one that really doesn't have anything useful to say or add.

---

FoolOfElysium said:

Sulfurshelfsean said:

Elyse is all nuance, no facts. In other words he just makes up what he feels is going on. Fascists are all about the feels, not about the facts.

---

And *you* are all accusation, no discussion. Despite everyone here constantly tossing daggers my way, at least I *try* to make a conversation out of it.

In 2025, the losing arguments are the ones that do exactly what you're doing, which is ignoring the discussion itself and focusing on on the one pointing out the obvious. You're welcome to keep doing it, but outside of this echo-chamber, it's a losing strategy, so you might wanna roll up your sleeves and get some practice in, because the narrative is shifting and a lot of people here aren't gonna be able to handle it. Your personal attacks simply do not work any longer. Guilt and shame do not work any longer. The left has lost the cancel-culture war and are still blaming others because they've also completely lost the plot.

They won't silence us with the naysaying, they simply make us go harder.

---

feevers said:

mushboy said:

i dont think ive seen someone project themselves on others quite like you do.

---

I can think of a handful of people on here over the past few years with the same ability, coincidentally they all were trumpies and all either had psychotic breakdowns, ragequit or ended up banned

Will be interesting to see how it goes for Fool

---

Brian Jones said:

feevers said:

mushboy said:

i dont think ive seen someone project themselves on others quite like you do.

---

I can think of a handful of people on here over the past few years with the same ability, coincidentally they all were trumpies and all either had psychotic breakdowns, ragequit or ended up banned

Will be interesting to see how it goes for Fool

---

What will it take to get Chopsticks back? A modest GoFundMe account?

---

FoolOfElysium said:

hear me out when I say I'm not a fascist

---

not once have i ever had to defend or explain myself in this fashion note he did not defend himself from supporting pedophiles.

vicepope said:

We are all Kim Jong Un.

---

gopher said:

I believe my mom would have read my journal if I had one, but I never did so I can't be 100% sure

I journal now though, if you read it you get what you deserve

---

I know 100% my mom would never have read my journal... if I was a fag like Ballsauce and wrote in journals

FoolOfElysium said:

Once the pedophiles and human traffickers are taken care of, it will be time to turn my sights on them.

You'll celebrate with me once pedophiles and human traffickers are all taken care of, right?

---

FoolOfElysium said:

I'll make you a deal.

If you can address my ideas and/or any of my points without your egoic dick flapping in the wind one time, I will address any points you make in good faith. I will happily (and with ease) put my sword away as well.

I have this *uncanny* (lol) ability to engage in conversation without making it personal, but I don't think you're capable of it.

Prove me wrong, and not only will I be pleasantly surprised, but I'll go back and forth with you as long as you'd like. Ball is in your court.

---

shivas.wisdom said:

I mean... we can all see the absurdity in Fools attempts to justify fascist oppression, but pointing out absurdity isn't a defense against fascism - are people prepared for the high likelihood that, despite being wrong about so much, Fool is correct about the state using these false labels to advance their political/social control?

Be careful of the slow boil - where is your line in the sand when passive resistance must become active?

---

FoolOfElysium said:

I've said many times I'm only hitched to this ship fascism because ...

---

you think we/people will forget/forgive that you hitched yourself to fascism for personal reasons??

shivas.wisdom said:

Yeah, and that's my fear - it will be too late to act by that point. It's too easy to think 'they won't target me' if you aren't doing anything explicitly anti-government, but the history of fascist movements doesn't support that belief - things can change for the worse overnight. That poem 'first they came...' is painfully true - immigrant, transgender, antifascist... piece by piece a unified resistance is being dismantled.

I don't think many people have dealt with mass raids or state repression, but my time spent in the environmental and anti-globalization movements have hammered home the risk of active surveillance and waking up in the middle of the night to dozens of militarized cops surrounding you. This is speculative fiction (link below), but it very closely mirrors my experiences - the only difference is that this story features nation-wide raids that continue for months, and leads into an endgame of total fascist control. It's worth the read, and then asking yourself, 'what would I do in that situation?'

https://crimethinc.com/2025/03/21/survival-a-story-about-anarchists-enduring-mass-raids

---