Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Can you quote what I said that warrants that response please?

---

Kwyjibo said:

I'm talking about all of the fraud conspiracy nonsense that you seem to think people should take seriously without any actual evidence to support it. People have been asking for evidence here for months and have gotten nothing. If you want a serious response then post serious evidence.

---

Quote:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
While I haven't seen clear evidence of fraud, what I've seen in many cases is something along the lines of a great many people complaining that they weren't allowed to watch the counting process, and then when asked if they had proof of fraud they said "no, I wasn't allowed to watch the process", and since they said "no", the cases were tossed.  Or cases were tossed because the courts said they didn't have jurisdiction.  So they didn't get tossed because we know there wasn't cheating, they got tossed because it couldn't be proven that there was cheating. 

---

koods said:

Let’s not forget this fraud conspiracy nonsense has resulted in Sidney Powell being sued for $1.3 billion dollars, due to her continued lying about dominion voting machines. All Sydney has to do now is prove her theories in court and she wins.

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Yes, I'm willing to see any evidence people have, while you and others sit here and complain about it.  How do we know if the evidence is valid or not if we don't look at it?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Yes, I'm willing to see any evidence people have, while you and others sit here and complain about it.  How do we know if the evidence is valid or not if we don't look at it?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Yes, I'm willing to see any evidence people have, while you and others sit here and complain about it.  How do we know if the evidence is valid or not if we don't look at it?

---

IdiotCircusBoy said:

It's my understanding these people fell into two categories.
1. They were not official poll watchers.  There were already official poll watchers there and these people just showed up.
2. They were harassing poll workers.

---

Kwyjibo said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Yes, I'm willing to see any evidence people have, while you and others sit here and complain about it.  How do we know if the evidence is valid or not if we don't look at it?

---

While we're at it, maybe you should apply your rules to yourself. You've made countless posts about Russia collusion while we still haven't seen all of the evidence yet. Why aren't you waiting to come to a conclusion on that until after we've seen all of the evidence?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Why aren't you following your own advice that "at some point it's time to shit or get off the pot"?

---

DividedQuantum said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Yes, I'm willing to see any evidence people have, while you and others sit here and complain about it.  How do we know if the evidence is valid or not if we don't look at it?

---

If we can use facts as evidence, the facts are that there has been extensive confirmation of the validity of the vote submitting and counting process, including numerous recounts and vetting of voting systems, and no fraud whatsoever has been found. Over sixty lawsuits alleging fraud have been dismissed due to the fact that literally zero evidence of fraud could be produced. Vote certification has been done in all fifty states with extensive confidence. Any attempt to refute or gloss over these facts is conspiracy theorizing.

Are facts enough?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

IdiotCircusBoy said:

It's my understanding these people fell into two categories.
1. They were not official poll watchers.  There were already official poll watchers there and these people just showed up.
2. They were harassing poll workers.

---

My understanding is that they kept official poll workers too far away to see anything, when they were supposed to allow them to be to be 6 feet away.

---