Home | Community | Message Board

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: johnm214]
    #14200049 -

johnm214 said:
hoodbran said:
Cups said:
Poid said:
I'd like to hear some reasons why people think that Whites are, in general, inherently intellectually superior to colored people.



Show me an majority black country that isn't a shit hole?

Personally knowing some razor sharp black folks I don't know what to make of it but it's true.  :shrug:



AFAIK alot of 3rd world/black country agricultural land is exploited by western countries to grow our wheat to feed our people and thus they rely on aid... So sure, they might be shit holes but remember who is keeping them this way.



:confused"

How the hell does wheat being grown for extranational interests make a country more of a shithole?  This seems to be simply anti-commerce nonsense.

You think they'd be better with nobody wanting anything to do with them or their resources, land?  Completely isolated?  At least extranational money employs people and supports some portion of their economy: the history of what happens when extranational companies are expelled from underdevloped countries reveals pretty clearly that its not a positive: Cambodia, Vietnam, North Korea, Cuba, et cet 

All those socialist governments did this and then their economy fell to pieces and people starved due to having nothing to trade.  Fantastic thinking :thumbup:




Hardly.

Quote:

Ethiopia is one of the hungriest countries in the world with 2.8 million people needing food aid, but paradoxically the government is offering at least 3m hectares of its most fertile land to rich countries and some of the world's most wealthy individuals to export food for their own populations.
The Guardian (An Independent Source)



The agribusiness happening in Africa is far from anti-economy or anti-globalization perspectives.  Its a stark reality that is going on.  Exploting land (and it is fertile land) is simple really, when the world if full of human overflow; where else is Uncle Sam, or Good ol Blighty going to find enough terra to support themouths to feed?

Quote:
As for IQ, it's just a concept that doesn't measure what it claims to.



Please back up your naked claim t hat IQ claims measure something but doesn't matter that which it claims.

This is not my understanding: it seems by definition to be a pretty nifty measure of apptitude- useful to assess relative performance of various people on the measuring instrument.



Quote:
As for blacks being outside the median for the general population on an intelligence quotient mean, is not to say such a test for equality of variances is actually true. The trouble with measures like these, is that, they are utterly ethnocentric and not really generalizable.



Quote:
Please justify your claim that "measures like these" are "utterly ethnocentric" and not justifiably assessing true relevant performance.

An example might be a relatively small, rural community.  With a relatively homogenous culture and community, it would seem difficult to justify your claim that realtive deviations of racially defined groups is not due to intelligence but is due to ethnocentric tests providing spurious answers.  How do you justify this?




Arbitrary numbers designed by affluent whites to quantify just one aspect of "intelligence" IS ethnocentric. I'm just not 100% sure if you'd get reliable cross-cultural means by asking groups in PNG for example...

Quote:
These types of claims seem to serve as convieniant appolgists for poor performance of particular groups, and the rush to adopt such explanations seems to be politically, emotionally, motivated from my viewpoint.  People seem to want to believe this, which should always be an indicatino that their conclusions need to be carefully analyzed.



:lol:


--------------------
Not all drugs are good, Some are great.




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: hoodbran]
    #14200223 -

Whoopsie forgot the backup to my weak claim:
http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/flynn1987.pdf


--------------------
Not all drugs are good, Some are great.




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: hoodbran]
    #14201025 -

hoodbran said:
johnm214 said:
How the hell does wheat being grown for extranational interests make a country more of a shithole?  This seems to be simply anti-commerce nonsense.

You think they'd be better with nobody wanting anything to do with them or their resources, land?  Completely isolated?  At least extranational money employs people and supports some portion of their economy: the history of what happens when extranational companies are expelled from underdevloped countries reveals pretty clearly that its not a positive: Cambodia, Vietnam, North Korea, Cuba, et cet 

All those socialist governments did this and then their economy fell to pieces and people starved due to having nothing to trade.  Fantastic thinking :thumbup:




Hardly.

Quote:

Ethiopia is one of the hungriest countries in the world with 2.8 million people needing food aid, but paradoxically the government is offering at least 3m hectares of its most fertile land to rich countries and some of the world's most wealthy individuals to export food for their own populations.
The Guardian (An Independent Source)



The agribusiness happening in Africa is far from anti-economy or anti-globalization perspectives.  Its a stark reality that is going on.  Exploting land (and it is fertile land) is simple really, when the world if full of human overflow; where else is Uncle Sam, or Good ol Blighty going to find enough terra to support themouths to feed?




What does that have to do with my point?  I agree that situation sucks, but so what?

The government using violent force to take property from people so they can sell it and make money is not "commerce" its "theft/piracy".  My argument was that they would not be better off without extranational commerce, not that they'd not be better off without a government that steals from its people for profit.

What does any of the arguments made or implied in your response, article, have to do with my claims?




Quote:
Arbitrary numbers designed by affluent whites to quantify just one aspect of "intelligence" IS ethnocentric. I'm just not 100% sure if you'd get reliable cross-cultural means by asking groups in PNG for example...




The numbers are not arbitrary, they are highly meaningful: generally 100 is defined to be the mean, and the scale is defined.  The results of individuals are calibrated to the test, and then used as the metric for the answer of others.

How is this arbitrary?  Its a systematic way of measuring relative performance.

What does the affluence of the designers have to do with anything?  Seems like just a classist argument there.  I don't know what png is or what that sentence means. 

You seem to have not justified your claims that the IQ testing results or scale is arbitrary.

Quote:
Quote:
These types of claims seem to serve as convieniant appolgists for poor performance of particular groups, and the rush to adopt such explanations seems to be politically, emotionally, motivated from my viewpoint.  People seem to want to believe this, which should always be an indicatino that their conclusions need to be carefully analyzed.



:lol:



An appeal to incredulity does not serve as any reply at all.  If you cannot defend your views on the merits, then don't assert them.  This forum is for discussion: ridicule doesn't accomplish any philosophical progress.

hoodbran said:
Whoopsie forgot the backup to my weak claim:
http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/flynn1987.pdf



I see you've provided a link to some document. 

How does this document back up your weak claim?  What claim is it backing up and how does it do so?  Pasting a link is not a rebutal or support for your position- I don't even know what you claim it establishes.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: johnm214]
    #14202092 -

Mod Edit: Name calling and personalisms are against the rules in PS&P. Is your argument so weak that instead of debating the issue on the table, you have to resort to calling people names? If so, don't post in PS&P. Try the OTD forum where name-calling is how they debate there.

Consider this your warning.

Read the rest of the rules here before you post again:

http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/4526664#4526664

Edited by Diploid (03/30/11 11:18 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: zzripz]
    #14202337 -

Maybe its not the psychedelics that help people see through propaganda then :snoop:

zzripz said:
I despair at some of the comments I have read under my last post! I feel sickened. Here's me researching for a blog i am calling 'can psychedelic help us see through propaganda?' and then see the comments here that would make a freakin ren neck blush>
SUCH racism! Such blindness and ignorance to what civilization is doing to planet earth, and aother species, and communities that are being totally exploited by this brutal mechanistic soul-dead mindset.

Such lack of empathy.

The sacred medicine has been completely useless for you. You make me despair for humanity when people such as yourselves continue in your decrepid rigid mean left-brained andocentric white supremacist tunnel-reality

Why do I think this has happened to the ones with the terrible views here?
Well...your condictioning is obviously to strong even for sacred medicine to resolve. MAYBE you choose wrong set and setting, I dont know I dont know you, but you are completely not getting it----enlightenment, and need to regroup. I am dead serious about this.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: lines]
    #14202374 -

No it is it is for many, including me, but obviously not the ones spoutin racist shit on this thread, and saying that bombing other humans etc and poisoning their water and land with toxic crap must mean that the ones who did it are 'intelligent'...??

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: zzripz]
    #14202392 -

zzripz said:
I despair at some of the comments I have read under my last post! I feel sickened. Here's me researching for a blog i am calling 'can psychedelic help us see through propaganda?' and then see the comments here that would make a freakin ren neck blush>
SUCH racism! Such blindness and ignorance to what civilization is doing to planet earth, and aother species, and communities that are being totally exploited by this brutal mechanistic soul-dead mindset.

Such lack of empathy.

The sacred medicine has been completely useless for you. You make me despair for humanity when people such as yourselves continue in your decrepid rigid mean left-brained andocentric white supremacist tunnel-reality

Why do I think this has happened to the ones with the terrible views here?
Well...your condictioning is obviously to strong even for sacred medicine to resolve. MAYBE you choose wrong set and setting, I dont know I dont know you, but you are completely not getting it----enlightenment, and need to regroup. I am dead serious about this.




:confused:

What's going on here, buddy?  You've written a lot but none of it resolves the problems with your post or the issues I've taken with it.  Plainly: its off topic.

What does me being racist, hating poor people, abusing sacred medicine, and all that crap have to do with anything? 

Despite it being off topic, why don't you go ahead and back up your claims of racist, white supremacist, qualities on my part?  That's a pretty signifigant accusation to be throwing around with out any support: I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you actually mean this litterally and aren't just name calling.

There's a special kind of arrogance that is revealed when someone decides that a difference of opinion couldn't be a result of a disagreement on the merits, but rather must be because others are unenlightened, abusers ofsacred medicine (whatever that means), and racist (let alone a white supremacist).

Please back up your claims and also those of me being racist and a white supremacist.  Further, please explain what "sacred medicine" is and how you know I'm an abuser of it?


btw, when I ask for an explanation, it means something that isn't an obviously fallacious straw man argument like your last post

zzripz said:
No it is it is for many, including me, but obviously not the ones spoutin racist shit on this thread, and saying that bombing other humans etc and poisoning their water and land with toxic crap must mean that the ones who did it are 'intelligent'...??



Just who said bombing people and poisoning their water is an indicator of intelligence?  Oops, that's right, nobody: you just made that up rather than engage people on the merits of what they've said.  For someone so stunned at ignorance, you seem to have some difficult articulating the erroneous, racist, content you find so objectionable.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: johnm214]
    #14202566 -

this whole thing reads a tad bit pedantic :thumbdown:


--------------------
Not all drugs are good, Some are great.




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: hoodbran]
    #14202580 -

The merits of my response are immaterial to the sufficiency of yours: I've meerly pointed out such.

You've made claims that you seem to abandon in lieu of discussing the nature of my reply.  The strange thing is that I note how nothing you've said has been supported whatsoever.  How you can call the observance of your complete and total failure to support your claims "pedantic" is beyond me.  Perhaps it was comprehensive, but the problem and objection is simple: you've put forth conclusions you have not supported, and now make more posts without addressing them at all.

If you don't want to or cannot back up your claims at least have the honesty to to own that.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: hoodbran]
    #14202645 -

I just don't have the time John.  If I asked my lecturers to prove their points in everything they said, Im sure Id be somewhat ostracised by the rest for wasting time.. Maybe Im missing your point here.  Either way, the sharing of knowledge for autodidactics assumes others are self learners too.  I do note that you are using philosophical nuances to describe what psychologists have theorized about (IQ) and well, I do consider myself a member of the psychological circles, being a grad student and all.  If you cared to look at the article I posted (link supplied) you'd find that IQ does NOT measure what many people assume it does and these have been compared cross-culturally and intergenerationally. So, I think I have answered your questions.


--------------------
Not all drugs are good, Some are great.




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: hoodbran]
    #14207541 -

IQ not measuring what people assume it does has nothing to do with whether its arbitrary, racist, whatever.

I did not dispute that IQ doesn't measure what many people think it does, and I'm unclear what this fact is asserted to prove.

If you don't have the time to demonstrate your claims' validity, then don't make them- certainly don't make them in the philosophy forum where the idea is worthless without some philosophical justification for it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: johnm214] * 1
    #14207970 -

Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology forum. Other people's points of view are just as valid.

I don't claim anybody has been racist, it might be the opinion of other posters here but certainly not me, besides, I have no time for neanderthals who claim supremacy.  As for everything else, well, I know all too well that talking to some people is analogous to talking to the walls.  So I give up, you win, go play. :dancer:


--------------------
Not all drugs are good, Some are great.




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: hoodbran]
    #14208127 -

hoodbran said:
Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology forum. Other people's points of view are just as valid.



What does "other people's points of view" have to do with anything?  You just say this like it bears some relationship to what I said, but fail, as usual, to demonstrate such- kinda like every other post you've made in this thread which is completely unsupported.

Nothing I said treated or implied a difference in whether the "points of view" were those of others or yourself/myself.  This seems just a straw man argument.  Do you have any honest response?


 
Quote:
As for everything else, well, I know all too well that talking to some people is analogous to talking to the walls.  So I give up, you win, go play. :dancer:



What does whetehr you convince me have to do with anything?  Are you making this some sort of competition or something?  Drop the ego, buddy, we're talking about ideas, not people.

Far as i can see, you've failed to provide any justification for any of your claims.  Next time just don't asert crap you can't support.  How you make all these posts and then make all these other posts in response which completely ignore the issue, and then imply others are wasting time, is beyond me.  Had you not said crap you have no basis for then all this exchange would have been avoided.  If you couldn't back up the things you said, and weren't going to, why would you even reply to my criticism of that fact?  Just a waste of space.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: johnm214] * 1
    #14209819 -

All these posts? by my count, ive made 6 posts in this thread over 2 days, cmpared to your averaging 11.43 posts per day in 30 some months (excluding your break in 2010).

The issues I argued in this thread were:

A) (Cups said) Black countries were shit holes because (me) western powers buy up land hence keeping poor countries poort, simple economics for the white powerful man.

B) This thread is about "blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites" - Measuring Intelligence is used by WSIC and other shabby tools to figure out some magic number that attempts to marginalise certain races of human beings (black, mexican, white alike) - I merely pointed out that IQ is a crock of shit and your hypercriticalness (noted by other posters as supremacy) -not my words- tells all.. So I make "all these (6) posts" to support all races of people, not just the few.

:peace:


--------------------
Not all drugs are good, Some are great.




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: hoodbran] * 1
    #14210023 -

I merely pointed out that IQ is a crock of shit and your hypercriticalness (noted by other posters as supremacy) -not my words- tells all

In other words, you haven't shown that IQ is a "crock of shit", you just said it is and expect everyone to accept it.

Is your argument really so weak that you can't defend it with anything other than "it's a crock because... well just because", or do you have an actual line of reasoning that leads to that conclusion?

I could say that the idea the Earth is round is a "crock of shit" and if I don't support that statement with anything more, well, then the statement is what's a crock.

I just don't have the time John.

THIS is what "tells it all".

You don't have the time to back up your statements, but you somehow have the time to make them and critique others who disagree while giving the "don't have time" excuse for not backing up what you claim.

YOU MAY WELL BE RIGHT, but so far in this thread all you've given us is a bunch of unsubstantiated conjecture and no reason to think you are in fact right.

How about you find the time to back it up, or otherwise, just stay out of the thread. Posting things, then ducking out of the debate wastes MY time.


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: Diploid] * 2
    #14210675 -

Fair shout.  I have ducked out of giving full blown arguments leading to substantiated conclusions, I can see that. So, I apologise for writing my thoughts in a forum without following the prescribed rules of philosophical debate.


--------------------
Not all drugs are good, Some are great.




Edited by hoodbran (03/30/11 07:26 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: lines]
    #14211896 -

Cool


---

By the way, in response to people who have called my racist and provided no argument to that effect, even going so far as calling me a white supremacist, I offer this explanation for my post.  I feel I shouldn't have to do so since nothing I've said leads to such conclusions, but for people's delicate sensitivities I'll disclaim various accused philosophies.

I do not believe any particular race or ethnicity is more likely to be more or less intelligent than another by virtue of their race or a genetic third variable correlated with such.  I do believe that blacks in the US are less intelligent than whites in the average case.  The evidence bears this out.  However nice it would be to imagine everyone the same, the vast differences in lifestyles, cultures, and locations makes such a somewhat dubious presumption: politically useful but dubious.

I do think IQ tests measure something, I don't think the results are arbitrary.  I think IQ tests measure the ability of subjects to perform the tasks required of them, and that such results are generally correlated with intelligence- capability to complete tasks of that sort. 

My presumption is that innate ability allows an individual to accomplish certain tasks, but that intelligence can be learned to some degree as well.  I believe this is true with the tests: those who have experience and practice reasoning will do better reasoning.  I believe this to be true due to my own experience and the data showing people performing better on tests of functioning after being given warm up tests or otherwise grow acustomed to the methodology used.

I presume blacks in the US score lower than whites due to their different culture: blacks are more likely to be poor, come from troubled homes and troubled neighborhoods, and are more likely to be exposed to a culture that resents formal education.  I assume this results in less exposure to testing of the sort and less exposure to challenging problems similar to IQ test questions as well as less inentive to perform well or learn.


I find it pretty insulting and presumptuous that people would call me a white supremacist for believing blacks are less intelligent than whites in the US on average when many reasons could be proffered for beleiving this (such as exposure to well planned studies which show the same thing).

The notion that everyone is equal is great politics as a way to justify equal protection and so forth, but we're not talking about that, we're talking about reality, and I find it pretty ridiculous how some have responded without any argument: calling people names because they dislike their beliefs.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: johnm214]
    #14222207 -

I dont even see what i said cause its been removed. I read worse here in this thread which must have made me angry. I will look over it later.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: zzripz]
    #14222270 -

What was removed is still quoted in two people, including my, reply.

I would appreciate some explanation for how you attribute white supremacist beliefs to me an dhow you can justify calling my beliefs racist or revealing of racist ideology.  I think its pretty plainly unjustified and requires some presumptions that you had no cause to make.

zzripz said:
I despair at some of the comments I have read under my last post! I feel sickened. Here's me researching for a blog i am calling 'can psychedelic help us see through propaganda?' and then see the comments here that would make a freakin ren neck blush>
SUCH racism! Such blindness and ignorance to what civilization is doing to planet earth, and aother species, and communities that are being totally exploited by this brutal mechanistic soul-dead mindset.

Such lack of empathy.

The sacred medicine has been completely useless for you. You make me despair for humanity when people such as yourselves continue in your decrepid rigid mean left-brained andocentric white supremacist tunnel-reality

Why do I think this has happened to the ones with the terrible views here?
Well...your condictioning is obviously to strong even for sacred medicine to resolve. MAYBE you choose wrong set and setting, I dont know I dont know you, but you are completely not getting it----enlightenment, and need to regroup. I am dead serious about this.




Whats all this sacred medicine, white supremacist, and racist jazz?  You also attack what seem to be straw man arguments as I've pointed out in my prior reply: bombing people and such.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: In response to the recent thread about Blacks being inherently less intelligent than whites... [Re: johnm214]
    #14229924 -

so whats this?
Quote:
I do believe that blacks in the US are less intelligent than whites in the average case.




You dont think THATblanket assertion of "black people" is racist?

You think YOU should be allowed to say that but I should get a warning of being banned for MY freedom of fukin speech?

And what is your CRITERIA for 'intellgence'? SOME 'good' white citizens who follow the orders of their psychopathic leaders?

Please define to me what you mean by 'intelligence'?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* No Evolution threads allowed.
( 1 2 all )
sir tripsalot 3,613 29 10/05/02 01:50 AM
by Anonymous
* There isn't intelligent life out there reason 2
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
Dogomush 10,212 141 09/07/09 12:46 PM
by sandman3698
* Intelligent Life
( 1 2 all )
Spokesman 2,635 35 11/29/03 08:55 AM
by Spokesman
* Taking responability for your food...
( 1 2 all )
upupup 3,463 30 12/11/02 12:25 PM
by upupup
* Two Supermassive Black Holes On Collision Course
( 1 2 3 all )
Mojo_Risin 4,560 52 01/08/03 05:57 AM
by trendal
* There isn't intelligent life on other planets
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Dogomush 5,865 79 02/06/06 05:44 PM
by TheGus
* The *OFFICIAL* Co-Incidences Thread
( 1 2 3 4 all )
nubious 5,860 61 07/29/03 03:07 PM
by Source
* Black holes
( 1 2 all )
LTBOOMER 2,697 36 06/30/03 08:55 PM
by Meph

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
6,351 topic views. 1 members, 4 guests and 16 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.031 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 18 queries.