Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #11175672 -

ahh I see.  so the more derogatory verbs we throw at something proves it must be wrong..

what is wrong for me must be wrong for you.  correct?


--------------------
LAGM v.2.024 Grow log

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: cyb3rtr0n]
    #11175728 -

Huh?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #11175826 -

:stonedjerk: Angst.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #11175844 -

OrgoneConclusion said:
How many more times? Truth converges. Falsehood diverges. There are some 10,000 sects of Christianity alone.



Thats a great way to put it.  Science isnt, and never claims to be absolute truth.  But it is certainly converging on something, and this recent work is another step in that direction.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: DieCommie]
    #11175862 -

converging on what exactly?


--------------------
I close my eyes and seize it
I clench my fists and beat it
I light my torch and burn it
I am the beast I worship....

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: cyb3rtr0n]
    #11175868 -

cyb3rtr0n said:
With this latest "discovery" of Ardi last week mankind has gotten a few million years older.  how is this possible?



It isn't possible. The human lineage has always been as old as it is, with the specific course of progress that it has taken.

Why did you put the word discovery in apostrophes?
Do you not feel that becoming aware of delicately fossilized remains of what could likely be a part of that human lineage from millions of years ago doesn't constitute "gaining knowledge or seeing something previously unknown or unseen"?
:strokebeard:
What did you find today? :lol:

Quote:
If science keeps debunking itself...




What are you talking about, exactly? Are you sure you are well-enough aware of what the meaning the word "debunk" conveys?
It really isn't clear what you're talking about here, because "debunk" means to expose a claim or an assertion as being false.
What claim or assertion did science make that was then debunked, and how does this discovery fit into that picture?

Quote:
why are there so many skeptics who need empirical evidence to comfort their perceptions?




Not quite sure what you're after with this question, but if we were to take the generalized question and fit it specifically within the context of this discovery, then I'd have to assume that skeptics would need empirical evidence of human remains existing for a specific amount of time before they could be comfortable in thinking that it is very likely that human remains had actually existed on this planet for that much time.

Other than that, you'll have to fill me in on what unspoken topic from your own mind you're jousting at before being more able to analyze it. :wink:


--------------------
:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you

:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: Olympus Mons]
    #11175890 -

Olympus Mons said:
converging on what exactly?



Thats a good question.  What do you think it is converging on?  Maybe a good clue is to think about what it throws out - the opposite of that must be what it is converging on.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: fireworks_god]
    #11175895 -

fireworks_god said:
Why did you put the word discovery in apostrophes?




Because it already existed.


--------------------
LAGM v.2.024 Grow log

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Darwin theory debunked [Re: cyb3rtr0n]
    #11175922 -

:confused: Thats what all discoveries are, finding things that already existed.  If it didnt already exist it would be an invention or creation not a discovery.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Darwins Missing Links
( 1 2 all )
cosmicchic 5,945 32 05/06/04 08:42 PM
by TheShroomHermit
* Fags against Darwin Moonshoe 1,344 15 10/20/06 11:37 AM
by thatiAM
* Darwinism and Racism Zahid 1,091 7 08/24/04 07:50 PM
by Huehuecoyotl
* A Theory of Psychedelics
( 1 2 3 4 all )
pattern 25,309 66 01/04/20 05:45 PM
by sudly
* Why people believe in evolution despite the fact it is a failed theory with no scientific basis?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
fivepointer 16,210 135 03/30/07 06:13 AM
by aryah
* A New Theory of the Universe
( 1 2 all )
psychomime 5,318 31 10/04/07 07:14 PM
by onlynow
* Theories
( 1 2 all )
Swami 3,319 38 05/18/05 05:01 AM
by eMotionALLmotion
* How would one go about testing the Intelligent Design Theory?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
dr0mni 12,436 103 05/17/09 02:49 AM
by Darwinian

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
2,431 topic views. 1 members, 505 guests and 30 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 15 queries.