Quote:

---

leery11 said:
darwin is a relative perspective

perspectives lead way to evidence, confirming theory

scientists use logic, reason, inquiry , as best they can, to know the truth, the problem is hypothesis always governs experiment and experiment without hypothesis leads to a random unified theory of something, and the basis of all this is YOU , the self, spinning knowledge in the hed

for example, one may investigate, diligently , the types of thing darwin did, and come to find we did not in any way "descend" ) you mean ascend ? ?? and/or/etc/what?) from monkeys,

? how is his information real ? he is gathering a process which is real enough but to explain anything about that process is where the trickiness of reality is . subjective . lee .

evolution as he sees it may not be what he is seeing into it , know what i mean ?

man wants the truth :
man devotes time to discovery :
psychedelic, meditation,
scriptures,
science

he uses some sort of instrument, all the while HE is the ONE using it , know what i mean ?
he finds things,
if he studies the Bible he confirms God to himself , or dis confirms, if he uses a microscope, if he uses a mushroom, see what i mean ? arbitrary and relative
no need to be religious about science, dogmatic science ?

the hindus had a ton of technology and supposedly flying machines, they sure did wrote about FLYING MACHINES, so , their inquiry was internal in meditation  ?

relative ?

FOOD FOR THOUGHT .

---