Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: vicepope] * 2
    #29673726 -

vicepope said:
But he never was a conservative and no one believes that he was.



That's my point.  Stupid people voted for trump because he's stupid and they saw themselves in him.  They think, "finally someone who sees things like I do."


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: Enlil] * 1
    #29673730 -

Enlil said:
vicepope said:
But he never was a conservative and no one believes that he was.



That's my point.  Stupid people voted for trump because he's stupid and they saw themselves in him.  They think, "finally someone who sees things like I do."




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: AlChemicalResearch]
    #29673739 -

AlChemicalResearch said:
Enlil said:
Trump's base is stupid people.  More conservatives are stupid than liberals, so that's why people think he's conservative.



Conservatives have more diversity of thought than liberals.

https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12665

Quote:
According to the present findings, Democrats (more than Republicans) tightly centre their belief-system around a set of positions at the extremes of these particular items, implying that people who deviate from these positions are likely to be considered as outgroup members (extremity should thereby be understood as a function of both, the formulation of the item and the response). It is possible that holding extreme (and thus unnegotiable) attitudes on important social-political issues has become increasingly identity defining for Democrats, not least in response to Donald Trump’s controversial presidency.




Conservatives have higher IQ than liberals.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614001081

Quote:
Individuals who identify as Republican have greater probability knowledge
•Individuals who identify as Republican have higher verbal reasoning ability
•Individuals who identify as Republican have better question comprehension
•Cognitive ability’s effect on party identity works through socio-economic position

Carl (2014) analysed data from the U.S. General Social Survey (GSS), and found that individuals who identify as Republican have slightly higher verbal intelligence than those who identify as Democrat.In all three cases, individuals who identify as Republican score slightly higher than those who identify as Democrat; the unadjusted differences are 1–3 IQ points, 2–4 IQ points and 2–3 IQ points, respectively. Path analyses indicate that the associations between cognitive ability and party identity are largely but not totally accounted for by socio-economic position: individuals with higher cognitive ability tend to have better socio-economic positions, and individuals with better socio-economic positions are more likely to identify as Republican. These results are consistent with Carl's (2014) hypothesis that higher intelligence among classically liberal Republicans compensates for lower intelligence among socially conservative Republicans.




https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9548663/

Quote:
Evidence on the association of cognitive ability with economic attitudes is mixed. We conducted a meta-analysis (k = 20, N = 46,426) to examine the relationship between objective measures of cognitive ability and economic ideology and analyzed survey data (N = 3,375) to test theoretical explanations for the association. The meta-analysis provided evidence for a small positive association with a weighted mean effect size of r = .07 (95% CI = [0.02, 0.12]), suggesting that higher cognitive ability is associated with conservative views on economic issues, but effect sizes were extremely heterogeneous. Tests using representative survey data provided support for both a positive association of cognitive ability with economic conservatism that is mediated through income as well as for a negative association that is mediated through a higher need for certainty




https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337447370_Smart_and_Poor_or_Rich_and_Dull_A_US_County-Level_Analysis_of_the_Relationship_between_IQ_and_Presidential-_Election_Voting_Behavior

Quote:
With U.S. state-level data, IQ scores positively predict votes cast for Democrats, but only when controlling for state racial composition. Here, however, we explore the relationship between IQ and voting behavior at the level of U.S. counties (approx. n = 3,100). We find that county-level IQ weakly predicts more votes cast for Republicans (r's .07 to .13) and less votes cast for Democrats (r's-.10 to-.14). These small relationships are also found in multiple regression analyses, even when demographic data, social status, and population density appear as covariates (3-4% points more votes cast for Republicans per standard deviation of IQ). The effect of general social status was opposite that of intelligence (6-9% points less votes cast for Republicans per standard deviation of social status), which is surprising considering the very strong positive correlation (r = .77) between IQ and social status. Additionally, racial homogeneity by itself predicts voting Republican; however, when other variables are present in the regression model, homogeneity predicts voting Democrat.










It used to be the other way around, but the democrats/liberals of the last 10 years really went off the deep end trying to end the Occupy Wall Street movement and save the banks.



You think you found something but edd kemper serial killer had a 140 IQ and ted Kaczynski had an estimated 160.  You can still be a stupid piece of shit and have good verbal skills.  Benedict Arnold was smart enough to rise pretty high but he was still a traitor.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: AlChemicalResearch] * 1
    #29674032 -

AlChemicalResearch said:
Conservatives have higher IQ than liberals.





Haha. Hahaha. Hahahahahahahahaha.

:lolsy:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: CrAcKbAbY]
    #29675185 -

CrAcKbAbY said:




one of my fav albums

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: lifeiswhatyoumake] * 1
    #29675352 -

lifeiswhatyoumake said:
AlChemicalResearch said:
Conservatives have higher IQ than liberals.





Haha. Hahaha. Hahahahahahahahaha.

:lolsy:



Ohhh boy.  Yeaaaaaah.  Kinda rich, claimin conservatives are smart while still thinkin IQ measures a damn thing.  You can study for IQ tests, they are LITERALLY meaningless garbage chuds use to measure their tiny, malformed cocks against one another.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: DorkWithTheHair] * 2
    #29675432 -

AlChemicalResearch said:
Conservatives have more diversity of thought than liberals.

https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12665



396 people were asked a few questions, hardly proof of diversity of thought on either side.


AlChemicalResearch said:
Conservatives have higher IQ than liberals.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614001081




That was a info published in the General Social Survey (GSS), its a sample of 2,158 people using their WORDSUM scores, again, hardly proof of higher IQ on either side. Also, the studies were comparing Republican vs Democrat, not Conservatives vs Liberals.

Enlil was talking about Trump's base while youre tossing out 'facts' about Conservatives, theres a huge difference between Maga and Conservatives, especially in the areas of diversity and IQ. Enlil is correct, Trump's base is stupid.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: DorkWithTheHair]
    #29680185 -

DorkWithTheHair said:
lifeiswhatyoumake said:
AlChemicalResearch said:
Conservatives have higher IQ than liberals.





Haha. Hahaha. Hahahahahahahahaha.

:lolsy:



Ohhh boy.  Yeaaaaaah.  Kinda rich, claimin conservatives are smart while still thinkin IQ measures a damn thing.  You can study for IQ tests, they are LITERALLY meaningless garbage chuds use to measure their tiny, malformed cocks against one another.



Half of the iq test is stuff you can learn from a college algebra class. Things like sequences and series. The rest is just logic.


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: OutsideOfMyMind]
    #29680192 -

Logic and policy do go together.  Unfortunately no one on the left side applies logic to policy. You applies emotional demands in policy.


--------------------
The better guide to grow mushrooms.
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/8553541

Beware the power of one.  The power of two. The power of many.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: vicepope]
    #29680325 -

Would you say that the majority of the populace make decisions based on logic primarily?  Or emotions primarily?

Policymaking is and has always been based on emotions.  Whether it's an individual making policy for himself and/or his family or a world leader making policy.  It's ALWAYS based on emotions.  Humans apply logic as a tool to meet their emotional needs.  Logic is never the driving force.




--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: vicepope] * 1
    #29680413 -

Quote:
Logic and policy do go together.  Unfortunately no one on the left side applies logic to policy. You applies emotional demands in policy.




 
    All Trump had to do was not start a war . That's it . One fucking thing he couldn't do it . Please don't talk about logic ..


--------------------


Edited by Psilynut2 (09/28/26 10:15 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: Enlil]
    #29680426 -

Enlil said:
Stupid people voted for trump because he's stupid and they saw themselves in him.




Oprah & Jesse Jackson spent 20 years promoting Trump as a great man.

41 million women voted for Donald Trump in the last US election.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: RJ Tubs 202] * 5
    #29680428 -

41 million women are stupid
:nodofunderstanding:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: mushboy]
    #29680431 -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: RJ Tubs 202]
    #29680441 -

RJ Tubs 202 said:
Enlil said:
Stupid people voted for trump because he's stupid and they saw themselves in him.




Oprah & Jesse Jackson spent 20 years promoting Trump as a great man.

41 million women voted for Donald Trump in the last US election.



Probably even more women paid oprah to lose weight over the last decades and now she is on gila monster venom lol


--------------------
For most of the normies out there, an operating system is just a bootloader for Google Chrome.

And I don't know what the mantis is praying for
But he's probably just thanking the Lord
That he don't live in a home
And he don't got a phone
And he don't sit around all angry and bored
(He's just a bug)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: Mystikal] * 1
    #29680447 -

There's a video on YouTube somewhere of this woman dressed in an American flag Donald Trump shirt talking about how even though her parents were not legally permitted to be here but how he represents all of our values and how excited she is to vote for him.

That person and her whole family are fucking gone now.
That's the price you pay for stupid.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: GenesisCorrupted] * 1
    #29680452 -

GenesisCorrupted said:
There's a video on YouTube somewhere of this woman dressed in an American flag Donald Trump shirt talking about how even though her parents were not legally permitted to be here but how he represents all of our values and how excited she is to vote for him.

That person and her whole family are fucking gone now.
That's the price you pay for stupid.



:feelsgoodman:


--------------------
"Which of you to gain me, tell, will risk uncertain pains of hell?
I will not forgive you if you will not take the chance"

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: GenesisCorrupted]
    #29680481 -

GenesisCorrupted said:
There's a video on YouTube somewhere of this woman dressed in an American flag Donald Trump shirt talking about how even though her parents were not legally permitted to be here but how he represents all of our values and how excited she is to vote for him.

That person and her whole family are fucking gone now.
That's the price you pay for stupid.



Seems legit.


--------------------
Amanita86 said:
Sui is trying to mod right now.  Kinda like a newborn calf tryin ta stand fer the first time ain’t it..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: mushboy]
    #29680492 -

mushboy said:
41 million women are stupid
:nodofunderstanding:



Here's an issue...  Many of those women were far from stupid.  They were gambling at a time when every choice was horrible... but one was at least offering the right things.  One wasn't directly insulting them, telling them what to think and how to live their lives.

The democrats were an absolutely tone deaf, undemocratic, hypocritical, joke.  Trump offered the right things.  Democrats; They thought the had it in the bag, with insults and shaming... AGAIN.. and lost, AGAIN...

Midterms are HERE.. and you BEST stop calling people stupid, who have YOUR future in their hands.  Those 41 million woman are still there, don't you think it's time to TRY something better than MORE insult and shaming? 

It's the left communicators and leaders that need to smarten the fuck up, not women.  They need intelligent, reasonable, LIKEABLE communicators who don't alienate half the population by insulting them.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: Awebig Throy]
    #29680498 -

i was being facetious :shrug:

actually i worship women. everything about them

:naughty::borfase::derfase:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 2119 2120 )
XUL 500,153 42,393 09/30/26 12:54 AM
by lowbrow
* Canada's Liberal Goverment may fall next month. lonestar2004 2,339 18 04/13/05 06:09 PM
by Silversoul
* 2020 VISION What will Canada look like in 15 years?
( 1 2 3 4 all )
lonestar2004 10,885 65 12/12/19 01:38 PM
by JohnRainy
* Canada and Fox News. - freedom of speech?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Innvertigo 7,253 102 02/07/05 12:26 PM
by Phred
* USA planned to invade Canada
( 1 2 3 all )
carbonhoots 5,104 43 08/16/15 06:37 AM
by sweeper54
* O Canada! *DELETED*
( 1 2 3 all )
LunarEclipse 4,046 42 11/19/07 05:34 PM
by Luddite
* US States Renamed For Countries With Similar GDPs lonestar2004 413 1 06/22/07 08:22 PM
by zappaisgod
* Canada says no to missile defence
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
carbonhoots 5,897 93 03/05/05 06:44 PM
by Rono

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
3,411 topic views. 0 members, 9 guests and 36 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 16 queries.