Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: vicepope] * 2
    #29673726 -

vicepope said:
But he never was a conservative and no one believes that he was.



That's my point.  Stupid people voted for trump because he's stupid and they saw themselves in him.  They think, "finally someone who sees things like I do."


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: Enlil] * 1
    #29673730 -

Enlil said:
vicepope said:
But he never was a conservative and no one believes that he was.



That's my point.  Stupid people voted for trump because he's stupid and they saw themselves in him.  They think, "finally someone who sees things like I do."




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: AlChemicalResearch]
    #29673739 -

AlChemicalResearch said:
Enlil said:
Trump's base is stupid people.  More conservatives are stupid than liberals, so that's why people think he's conservative.



Conservatives have more diversity of thought than liberals.

https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12665

Quote:
According to the present findings, Democrats (more than Republicans) tightly centre their belief-system around a set of positions at the extremes of these particular items, implying that people who deviate from these positions are likely to be considered as outgroup members (extremity should thereby be understood as a function of both, the formulation of the item and the response). It is possible that holding extreme (and thus unnegotiable) attitudes on important social-political issues has become increasingly identity defining for Democrats, not least in response to Donald Trump’s controversial presidency.




Conservatives have higher IQ than liberals.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614001081

Quote:
Individuals who identify as Republican have greater probability knowledge
•Individuals who identify as Republican have higher verbal reasoning ability
•Individuals who identify as Republican have better question comprehension
•Cognitive ability’s effect on party identity works through socio-economic position

Carl (2014) analysed data from the U.S. General Social Survey (GSS), and found that individuals who identify as Republican have slightly higher verbal intelligence than those who identify as Democrat.In all three cases, individuals who identify as Republican score slightly higher than those who identify as Democrat; the unadjusted differences are 1–3 IQ points, 2–4 IQ points and 2–3 IQ points, respectively. Path analyses indicate that the associations between cognitive ability and party identity are largely but not totally accounted for by socio-economic position: individuals with higher cognitive ability tend to have better socio-economic positions, and individuals with better socio-economic positions are more likely to identify as Republican. These results are consistent with Carl's (2014) hypothesis that higher intelligence among classically liberal Republicans compensates for lower intelligence among socially conservative Republicans.




https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9548663/

Quote:
Evidence on the association of cognitive ability with economic attitudes is mixed. We conducted a meta-analysis (k = 20, N = 46,426) to examine the relationship between objective measures of cognitive ability and economic ideology and analyzed survey data (N = 3,375) to test theoretical explanations for the association. The meta-analysis provided evidence for a small positive association with a weighted mean effect size of r = .07 (95% CI = [0.02, 0.12]), suggesting that higher cognitive ability is associated with conservative views on economic issues, but effect sizes were extremely heterogeneous. Tests using representative survey data provided support for both a positive association of cognitive ability with economic conservatism that is mediated through income as well as for a negative association that is mediated through a higher need for certainty




https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337447370_Smart_and_Poor_or_Rich_and_Dull_A_US_County-Level_Analysis_of_the_Relationship_between_IQ_and_Presidential-_Election_Voting_Behavior

Quote:
With U.S. state-level data, IQ scores positively predict votes cast for Democrats, but only when controlling for state racial composition. Here, however, we explore the relationship between IQ and voting behavior at the level of U.S. counties (approx. n = 3,100). We find that county-level IQ weakly predicts more votes cast for Republicans (r's .07 to .13) and less votes cast for Democrats (r's-.10 to-.14). These small relationships are also found in multiple regression analyses, even when demographic data, social status, and population density appear as covariates (3-4% points more votes cast for Republicans per standard deviation of IQ). The effect of general social status was opposite that of intelligence (6-9% points less votes cast for Republicans per standard deviation of social status), which is surprising considering the very strong positive correlation (r = .77) between IQ and social status. Additionally, racial homogeneity by itself predicts voting Republican; however, when other variables are present in the regression model, homogeneity predicts voting Democrat.










It used to be the other way around, but the democrats/liberals of the last 10 years really went off the deep end trying to end the Occupy Wall Street movement and save the banks.



You think you found something but edd kemper serial killer had a 140 IQ and ted Kaczynski had an estimated 160.  You can still be a stupid piece of shit and have good verbal skills.  Benedict Arnold was smart enough to rise pretty high but he was still a traitor.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New Canada (RENAMED) [Re: AlChemicalResearch]
    #29674032 -

AlChemicalResearch said:
Conservatives have higher IQ than liberals.





Haha. Hahaha. Hahahahahahahahaha.

:lolsy:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* If Republicans Were Democrats luvdemshrooms 3,189 17 11/20/06 01:47 PM
by pokermush
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 2096 2097 )
XUL 494,633 41,930 09/21/26 08:33 AM
by dinosaurs
* CANADA: Junior partner in global war carbonhoots 517 1 01/17/08 01:52 AM
by Noetical
* Canada's flip-flopping Prime Minister carbonhoots 1,352 12 03/10/05 03:12 PM
by Phluck
* Unhappy Democrats Need to Wait to Get Into Canada
( 1 2 all )
Stein 2,270 34 11/04/04 08:10 AM
by Innvertigo
* Do Republican Politicians Deserve To Be Held To a Higher Standard?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Madtowntripper 8,488 114 04/24/08 10:10 PM
by Daishi
* Canada Imigration website flooded after Re-Election
( 1 2 all )
Dreamer987 3,667 26 11/09/04 09:58 PM
by ShitsmithMcGay
* Canada's Liberal Goverment may fall next month. lonestar2004 2,339 18 04/13/05 06:09 PM
by Silversoul

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
2,957 topic views. 2 members, 67 guests and 16 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.023 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 15 queries.