Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

The Spore Depot
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 626 | 627 | 628 | 629 | 630 | 631 | 632 | 633 | 634 | 635 | 636 | 637 | 638 | 639 | 640 | 641 | 642 | 643 | 644 | 645 | 646 | | Last >
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: CHeifM4sterDiezL] * 1
    #27069468 -

There is no Edison county in the United States.

I read an article on my phone at work last night. As qman said there's quite a cash grab going on here. The faithful think they are contributing for a recount and legal battle against the election results. Most of the money is going into Trump's "leadership" PAC, which has little regulation on who is getting that cash or for what purpose. Sidney Powell is soliciting contributions that go directly into her law firm's checking account.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #27069490 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
I saw the Giuliani press conference where he said he would present evidence of the following:

[...]

So how do you know Giuliani doesn't have this evidence before he presents it in court?


Because I've read the Trump campaign court decision where Giuliani said "[the Campaign] doesn’t plead fraud. . . . [T]his is not a fraud case.”

It's important to remember people are under oath in court, and not during political theatre press conferences.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: shivas.wisdom] * 1
    #27069499 -

Giuliani wasn't under oath in that hearing.  Lawyers rarely are under oath in court.  The important thing to remember is that lawyers can't just allege whatever they want in a complaint.  They are supposed to have done their due diligence and determined a factual basis for allegations before filing them with the court.  Similarly, statements made to the court have to have a factual basis.

That is the reason most of the lawsuits have been about tangential issues instead of election fraud.  In order to plead fraud, a plaintiff has to plead specific facts, and lawyers have been unable to do that ethically for the most part.  Powell's lawsuits are really the first to do it in any meaningful way, and she took a big risk doing that.  We'll see very soon how those play out, but I doubt they'll go well for her.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil]
    #27069509 -

They have 12 days before it’s over. Maybe they shouldn’t have waited an entire month before presenting evidence. Like everything in Trump world, it’s just incompetence and lies.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: CHeifM4sterDiezL]
    #27069947 -

CHeifM4sterDiezL said:
Those observers claim they just wanted to innocently watch over when in reality they were nothing but disruptive on purpose. Things like demanding to be less than 6 ft away from ppl during the pandemic and then when people say absolutely no that ridiculous they cry voter fraud.


The complains wasn't that observers wanted to get closer than 6 feet, that's make believe on your part.

The complaint was that they were kept 30ft away where they couldn't see what they were supposed to be observing.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: bodhisatta]
    #27069950 -

bodhisatta said:
Rudy has zero credibility now. With a track record of 30+ dismissed election cases


Rudy didn't even have 30 cases.  Those were from other people.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil]
    #27069963 -

Enlil said:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
So how do you know Giuliani doesn't have this evidence before he presents it in court?


...most of the things you said, even if true, wouldn't be evidence of election fraud...


And some of it, if true, would be evidence of election fraud.

Enlil said:
Guiliani saying that he has affidavits isn't evidence of fraud.  Show us the affidavits.  Show us the actual evidence, and then we can discuss it.  How can we possibly discuss vague explanations from a lawyer about what he thinks the evidence shows?


People have been dismissing it as though he doesn't have it.  Maybe he doesn't, but how do we know that?

Enlil said:
If Rudy were a member of this site and he posted word for word, everything he said in that press conference, YOU would quote all of the same things you quoted in your post and respond with "Source?  Or make believe?"


Correct, and I AM STILL SAYING I want to see the evidence.  No different than always.

What I am pointing out is that many people here are saying he won't have the evidence, which might be true, but I don't know how anyone here knows that.  :shrug:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #27069990 -

Because he’s been to court and didn’t provide any


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #27069991 -

It's simple. If he had it, he would present it in court. He hasn't, and the electors cast their votes in less than two weeks.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil] * 2
    #27070006 -

Yeah if has has evidence he believes can flip the election outcome, it's certainly an unconventional strategy not to use it before the chance to change the outcome passes. Unless he doesn't want to win for some reason.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: psi] * 2
    #27070012 -

Wait are they waiting for? Bring the evidence forward, turn the election around. It's simple.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: christopera]
    #27070031 -

Proving the non-existence of hypothetical amazing evidence is a tall order, but we can at least say it's fairly implausible he would act in this way if he had it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: psi] * 1
    #27070076 -

psi said:
Yeah if has has evidence he believes can flip the election outcome, it's certainly an unconventional strategy not to use it before the chance to change the outcome passes. Unless he doesn't want to win for some reason.


:lol:

It really is that simple, and made even simpler by trump’s own justice department admitting that there was no fraud found. Anyone still arguing is just being disingenuous.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 3
    #27070095 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
CHeifM4sterDiezL said:
Those observers claim they just wanted to innocently watch over when in reality they were nothing but disruptive on purpose. Things like demanding to be less than 6 ft away from ppl during the pandemic and then when people say absolutely no that ridiculous they cry voter fraud.


The complains wasn't that observers wanted to get closer than 6 feet, that's make believe on your part.

The complaint was that they were kept 30ft away where they couldn't see what they were supposed to be observing.


You know what isn't make believe. Those people were there to be asshats more than faithful observers


--------------------
Everything you need in one spot.

My Q&A thread. Ask me questions here rather than in Private Message
Bod's chat thread

5g a day keeps the 5g away

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #27070097 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
bodhisatta said:
Rudy has zero credibility now. With a track record of 30+ dismissed election cases


Rudy didn't even have 30 cases.  Those were from other people.


The president with rudy as his lawyer have done over 30


--------------------
Everything you need in one spot.

My Q&A thread. Ask me questions here rather than in Private Message
Bod's chat thread

5g a day keeps the 5g away

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: feevers] * 1
    #27070100 -

Enlil said:
It's simple. If he had it, he would present it in court. He hasn't, and the electors cast their votes in less than two weeks.


So let's take a look at one example above.  In Pittsburgh, over 15,000 voters had to cast provisional ballots because they were told they already voted, unbeknownst to them.

Is this not evidence of voter fraud?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: bodhisatta]
    #27070103 -

bodhisatta said:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
The complains wasn't that observers wanted to get closer than 6 feet, that's make believe on your part.

The complaint was that they were kept 30ft away where they couldn't see what they were supposed to be observing.


You know what isn't make believe. Those people were there to be asshats more than faithful observers


They may have become asshats when they were told they couldn't properly observe.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #27070107 -

Where’s a source for that? I live in Pittsburgh.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #27070108 -

where is your evidence of this? 15000 affidavits?  I don't see how else you're going to prove this claim.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #27070110 -

No. Right now it's a story. Only people with low to no credibility have uttered that


--------------------
Everything you need in one spot.

My Q&A thread. Ask me questions here rather than in Private Message
Bod's chat thread

5g a day keeps the 5g away

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 626 | 627 | 628 | 629 | 630 | 631 | 632 | 633 | 634 | 635 | 636 | 637 | 638 | 639 | 640 | 641 | 642 | 643 | 644 | 645 | 646 | | Last >

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Dems Finally Sobering Up. Establishment 2020 frontrunner Kamala Harris endorses single payer
( 1 2 3 4 ... 13 14 )		 The Ecstatic 5,477 275 09/29/17 07:10 PM
by The Ecstatic
* Bernie Sanders for President in 2020?
( 1 2 3 all )		 Falcon91Wolvrn03 1,669 42 04/28/17 11:10 PM
by starfire_xes
* No proof has been found between Trump and Russia ties...
( 1 2 3 4 ... 103 104 )		 Patlal 34,546 2,060 09/28/17 04:19 PM
by akira_akuma
* Energized By Trump's Win, White Nationalists Gather To 'Change The World' yogabunnyM 841 13 11/22/16 04:53 PM
by Mostly_Harmless
* Can Trump run in 2020 if he gets impeached & sentenced or if he resigns ?
( 1 2 all )		 howsyournaggerdoin 947 32 09/21/17 12:11 PM
by akira_akuma
* Trump
( 1 2 3 4 ... 131 132 )		 DividedQuantumM 78,992 2,635 01/19/21 07:19 AM
by STPLSD25
* Trump calls CNN fake news
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )		 Psychonott 1,849 103 01/17/17 01:29 PM
by Falcon91Wolvrn03
* Trump: 'In my first 100 days, I kept my promise to the American people'
( 1 2 3 all )		 Bubbles85 1,503 44 05/06/17 01:31 AM
by demiu5

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
477,178 topic views. 1 members, 24 guests and 14 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.014 seconds on 16 queries.