crackbaby said:

it'll be a while before i am able to consume cheese products again

---

Dick cheese doesnt even look like cheese...i never understood the term. It looks more like soggy pieces of chipped white paint

Bill_Oreilly said:

Tantrika said:

Amanita86 said:

koods said:

I don’t put uncut in my mouth. I’m not gross.

---

That settles it as far as I’m concerned, I’ll see you fellers at the bar...

/end thread

---

Earlier in this thread, there was a comment formulating in my mind that the thing that annoys me most with getting head
is when women do not seem to comprehend that the foreskin simply retracts and the head is there like any cut dick
this shows up in porn as well; seeing an American woman licking the outside of the foreskin makes me facepalm rather than triggering any arousal

to me tho, the most interesting part of koods post is that it is effectively a confession that he is bad at giving head
because he's not brave enough to play around with natural manhood
this was sort of neat to consider, because previously my thoughts were that homosexual men would logically be the "best" at oral sex due to the most affinity to the penis
but apparently cis women love cock more than a gay dude

---

The proper way to give head to someone uncut is to put the mouth past the head so when the girl goes back and forth, its not exposing the head.

The head should not be exposed during oral or vaginal sex. When the head gets exposed, it will start to desensitize it. That's the whole fucking point of the foreskin..its too KEEP THE HEAD SENSITIVE. I dont get whats so hard to comprehend. When you wash the head, it shouldnt be so desensitized that you can scrub it. Then you basically circumcised yourself if its that desensitized.

The lack of basic dick knowledge around here is astounding...especially since 3/4 of this place are gays.

The skin is there to keep the head lubricated. The head no longer is lubricated the more you expose it.

---

When you speak of the "proper" way, are you referring to your own methods of administrating?

Consistently, head is more pleasurable when the the foreskin is withdrawn and the glans of the penis is licked and sucked
getting head with the foreskin still covering the glans kills the majority of the sensation
You act like having exposure for a few minutes of washing and a few hours of sex per day will somehow act against the benefits that the foreskin provides in protecting the glans from stimulation rubbing against underwear all day

also, it is pleasurable when a woman licks inside the forskin
as it stimulates the glans of the penis as well as the nerve endings on the inside of the foreskin simultaneously

but never claimed to have a profound amount of dick knowledge, am simply a transwoman who is attracted to women
and finds hilarity in the back and forth over foreskin--the best was Connisseur linking to claims that circumcision was a form of emasculation
it hurts and stings but gives me giggles to think that a bit of extra skin on my penis makes me more "manly" than circumcised men
when not being a man myself at all

Amanita86 said:

He’s very passionate about uncut penis.

---

koods said:

I just called my mom and told her I hate her for stealing my chance to ever feel a real foreskin orgasm. I told her I’m no longer her son and I’d see her in hell. Thanks for opening my eyes

---

cannabinated said:

i havent had dick cheese or american cheese since I was a little boy

---

Bill_Oreilly said:

koods said:

I just called my mom and told her I hate her for stealing my chance to ever feel a real foreskin orgasm. I told her I’m no longer her son and I’d see her in hell. Thanks for opening my eyes

---

Good job man. Proud of you.

But nah seriously i dont care all im saying is if it didn't happen to you as a baby im sure you wouldnt get it done now..thats why its wrong.

---

Lophosaurus said:

Bill_Oreilly said:

koods said:

I just called my mom and told her I hate her for stealing my chance to ever feel a real foreskin orgasm. I told her I’m no longer her son and I’d see her in hell. Thanks for opening my eyes

---

Good job man. Proud of you.

But nah seriously i dont care all im saying is if it didn't happen to you as a baby im sure you wouldnt get it done now..thats why its wrong.

---

If I wasn't cut already then I would do it as an adult if the end result is the same. I want to look good naked and I want to want to be seen naked. If I had some smelly droopy skin cock I doubt I would get the same kind of action.

Bill you should post your cock pics and let us decide if you should get it snipped or not. I can guarantee it will look and smell better afterwards! But don't take my word for it, take Shroomery's word. Start a new thread when you post it though so it gets the right amount of attention.

---

specialpeopleclub said:

You definitely wouldn't, because you'd notice it feel better. Feeling better doesn't mean premature ejaculation. That's another problem.

It's so gross you think a mutilation looks good naked. It's gross you foisted that on your kid.
Even if it did look better in some objective way somehow, you took your kids choice away and you can't put it back later like you can get it removed.

I've read your posts and it's tough to say without it being an insult, but it's obvious not just from your opinion, but the way you defend it that you are a bad person. Maybe not malicious, but definitely someone that doesn't deserve the responsibility of a child.
That goes for many, many parents though

---

Quote:

That's what being a parent is. You have to make choices for them and that was one of the easier choices to make. It's a piece of skin, not a big deal. You have no idea what being a parent is about and I doubt someone will ever get close enough to you to make that a possibility.

---