christopera said:

I don't game as much as I used to, no motivation on my part, but when I did we used to say nasty shit to each other all the time. In college my buddy and I even had a guy knock on our door and try to beat us up because we called his girlfriend a pussy. We never said anything racist though.

---

Thank god you verbally assaulted a female, but never said anything "racist".

qman said:

Pinkerton said:

LOL here you're advocating for diversity:

qman said:

The Ecstatic said:

I’d love to vote for the candidate who best represents my views, but he’s not racist enough.

---

How is economic and social nationalism "racist"?  You do realize that the US is already a diverse population when it comes to race?  I want my fellow US citizen to do better than non-US citizens regardless of race, unfortunately you can't say the same.

---

https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/25875404#25875404

---

No, I'm advocating for doing the best for the diversity that currently exists, unfortunately most around here can't say the same.

---

And thus you advocate for diversity.

qman said:

Pinkerton said:

No, EU citizens have NO moral or legal obligation to take in any third world migrants at all. They have borders, national sovereignty and citizenship for a valid reason. No one in their right mind would sign up for some insane free for all, not gonna happen.

These EU citizens you speak so highly of benefits off third world misery.

Obviously they have moral obligation to take in poverty-stricken human beings. It's very simple.

The only people that benefit from bringing in broke third world migrants into first world nations are The Elite, the rest of the 99% of the population are fucked over in a large variety of reasons.

In EU, many migrants take the jobs Europeans don't want.

If EU citizens want to help third world citizens, the best deal would be assistance from a distance. That doesn't involve inviting third world migrants with no money, education or language ability into their homelands.

Unfortunately, with this absolute crap integration-system I agree with you.

Tribalism is real, but it starts small and then moves outward depending on the environment. This one tribe is hippy pie in the sky, time to get back to reality.

I'm very aware of tribalism, as you can read here (keep reading). One tribe isn't a hippie dream. Psychopath leaders divide us. They're most often if not always right wingers and complete fucking insane.

Donald President IS NOT about one tribe he misguides the pasturage.

We need benevolent leaders.

---

How many people is the EU obligated to take in according to your rules?  Where do you draw the line?  How low of a standard of living should they endure to make you feel better?

Also. how do EU citizens benefit from third world "misery"? 

It's not our leaders that divide us, it's our race, values, culture, tribalism and geography that does it.

There's the real world and there's the fantasy world you want to exist, getting self-righteous on these issues makes you feel better about yourself, but it's not realistic at all.

---

How many people is the EU obligated to take in according to your rules?  Where do you draw the line?  How low of a standard of living should they endure to make you feel better?

Enough to set the standard for how first world looks after their second and third world sisters and brothers.

Also. how do EU citizens benefit from third world "misery"?

Colonialism.

It's not our leaders that divide us, it's our race, values, culture, tribalism and geography that does it.

Uhm, yes it is. The mighty 1%, remember? It's just that the masses are misguided. The masses talks when money talks and who owns the money?

There's the real world and there's the fantasy world you want to exist, getting self-righteous on these issues makes you feel better about yourself, but it's not realistic at all.

I'm proclaiming world peace. You're proclaiming tribalism. That's all I see from this dialogue. But keep it coming, I'm learning how to counter tribalism.

Burke Dennings said:

Hopefully this event forces him to critically examine what kind of message and content he’s putting out into the world.

---

The Ecstatic said:

Australian Senator in press release today: “Actually the shooter is the victim.”

---

qman said:

The Ecstatic said:

No they don’t. They’re just delighted to have a persecution complex so they have something to throw back when actually oppressed groups are discussed.

---

But "diversity" makes us stronger!! 

---

Pinkerton said:

First he fucked over the Aboriginals, then the Maoris and now the Muslims.

I find it interesting how qman has not said a word about this in the politics forum.

---

The Ecstatic said:

Australian Senator in press release today: “Actually the shooter is the victim.”

---

lowbrow said:

Burke Dennings said:

Hopefully this event forces him to critically examine what kind of message and content he’s putting out into the world.

---

You should probably watch at least a few of his videos before saying this.  They’re as tame as you can get.

---

The Ecstatic said:

qman said:

The Ecstatic said:

No they don’t. They’re just delighted to have a persecution complex so they have something to throw back when actually oppressed groups are discussed.

---

But "diversity" makes us stronger!! 

---

It does. Google “evolutionary biology.”

---

Quote:

so terrible what’s happening. You know, the left plays a tougher game, it’s very funny. I actually think that the people on the right are tougher, but they don’t play it tougher. Okay? I can tell you, I have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of the Bikers for Trump – I have the tough people, but they don’t play it tough until they go to a certain point, and then it would be very bad, very bad. But the left plays it cuter and tougher.

---

Quote:

Law enforcement, military, construction workers, Bikers for Trump -- how about Bikers for Trump? They travel all over the country. They got Trump all over the place, and they’re great. They’ve been great. But these are tough people. These are great people. But they’re peaceful people, and Antifa and all -- they’d better hope they stay that way. I hope they stay that way. I hope they stay that way.

---

Pinkerton said:

qman said:

Pinkerton said:

No, EU citizens have NO moral or legal obligation to take in any third world migrants at all. They have borders, national sovereignty and citizenship for a valid reason. No one in their right mind would sign up for some insane free for all, not gonna happen.

These EU citizens you speak so highly of benefits off third world misery.

Obviously they have moral obligation to take in poverty-stricken human beings. It's very simple.

The only people that benefit from bringing in broke third world migrants into first world nations are The Elite, the rest of the 99% of the population are fucked over in a large variety of reasons.

In EU, many migrants take the jobs Europeans don't want.

If EU citizens want to help third world citizens, the best deal would be assistance from a distance. That doesn't involve inviting third world migrants with no money, education or language ability into their homelands.

Unfortunately, with this absolute crap integration-system I agree with you.

Tribalism is real, but it starts small and then moves outward depending on the environment. This one tribe is hippy pie in the sky, time to get back to reality.

I'm very aware of tribalism, as you can read here (keep reading). One tribe isn't a hippie dream. Psychopath leaders divide us. They're most often if not always right wingers and complete fucking insane.

Donald President IS NOT about one tribe he misguides the pasturage.

We need benevolent leaders.

---

How many people is the EU obligated to take in according to your rules?  Where do you draw the line?  How low of a standard of living should they endure to make you feel better?

Also. how do EU citizens benefit from third world "misery"? 

It's not our leaders that divide us, it's our race, values, culture, tribalism and geography that does it.

There's the real world and there's the fantasy world you want to exist, getting self-righteous on these issues makes you feel better about yourself, but it's not realistic at all.

---

How many people is the EU obligated to take in according to your rules?  Where do you draw the line?  How low of a standard of living should they endure to make you feel better?

Enough to set the standard for how first world looks after their second and third world sisters and brothers.

Also. how do EU citizens benefit from third world "misery"?

Colonialism.

It's not our leaders that divide us, it's our race, values, culture, tribalism and geography that does it.

Uhm, yes it is. The mighty 1%, remember? It's just that the masses are misguided. The masses talks when money talks and who owns the money?

There's the real world and there's the fantasy world you want to exist, getting self-righteous on these issues makes you feel better about yourself, but it's not realistic at all.

I'm proclaiming world peace. You're proclaiming tribalism. That's all I see from this dialogue. But keep it coming, I'm learning how to counter tribalism.

---

Pinkerton said:

First he fucked over the Aboriginals, then the Maoris and now the Muslims.

I find it interesting how qman has not said a word about this in the politics forum.

---

The Ecstatic said:

qman said:

The Ecstatic said:

No they don’t. They’re just delighted to have a persecution complex so they have something to throw back when actually oppressed groups are discussed.

---

But "diversity" makes us stronger!! 

---

It does. Google “evolutionary biology.”

---