Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: The Ecstatic] * 2
    #25515988 -

I guess I'll take my chances with Trump. Back on topic. BK is cleared of all accusations. No proof. Absolutely zero solid evidence that he did what he was accused of. Correct?

Let's move on to how the far left would deny a person the guy a fair trial. It was a total witch hunt.

And no. Based on my health care benefits that they take out of my paycheck biweekly.  Obama and his "affordable" health care act is a joke. My cost has doubled.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25515999 -

Incorrect.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Enlil]
    #25516045 -

Enlil. You dont know me at all, I know. You are like the shroomery lawyer from what I've seen.

This circus is a he said, she said. It's a tie right now. What would be your counsel on both sides? Would you even be able to really defend or prosecute one side or the other?

As a leagal guru on this forum it is your duty to not be partial on this topic.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa] * 1
    #25516057 -

Curious what you think you’re going to gain by his confirmation?  The last thing this country needs is a SC dominated by 1 party.  Trump nominated him as he believes in total executive power and that the president is immune from prosecution.  That sound good to you?


--------------------
🅂🄸🄶🄼🄰


Helpful Threads
stonesun
Mycolorado’s Tamp Fruit Project
Tampanensis Grow with Mycolorado
bw86's Jalisco Grow

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa] * 2
    #25516069 -

RomeoPapa said:
Enlil. You dont know me at all, I know. You are like the shroomery lawyer from what I've seen.

This circus is a he said, she said. It's a tie right now. What would be your counsel on both sides? Would you even be able to really defend or prosecute one side or the other?

As a leagal guru on this forum it is your duty to not be partial on this topic.


She testified credibly. He wasn't credible at all. He also lacks the temperament to be an effective judge. He's also incredibly partisan.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Mycolorado]
    #25516083 -

Myco. I respect and pay attention to what you have to say as a cultivator. Obviously we differ politically.  This argument can go on forever.

Can we all just agree to disagree?

This discussion isn't going anywhere.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25516085 -

At the end of the day, we all have our own opinions.  That's one if the things we can all agree on.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25516091 -

Why aren't they talking about that fat ass envelope that Sen Jackson passed off to Fords lawyer?


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25516097 -

Why would they? What was in it?


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25516111 -

RomeoPapa said:
Myco. I respect and pay attention to what you have to say as a cultivator. Obviously we differ politically.  This argument can go on forever.

Can we all just agree to disagree?

This discussion isn't going anywhere.


I appreciate that.  None of the discussions in this sub go anywhere.


--------------------
🅂🄸🄶🄼🄰


Helpful Threads
stonesun
Mycolorado’s Tamp Fruit Project
Tampanensis Grow with Mycolorado
bw86's Jalisco Grow

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Enlil]
    #25516134 -

Enlil said:
Why would they? What was in it?


I guess it was thank you letters.

The body language was enough to know it was a shady exchange.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25516186 -

thank you letters :lmafo:


--------------------
🅃 🄴 🄰 🄼    🄲 🄻 🄸 🄽 🄶 🅆 🅁 🄰 🄿

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25516507 -

RomeoPapa said:
Enlil said:
Why would they? What was in it?


I guess it was thank you letters.

The body language was enough to know it was a shady exchange.


If you don't know what it was,  what is there to talk about?


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Enlil] * 1
    #25516653 -

Good thing Dianne Feinstein and the Dems sat on these allegations until their hand was literally forced by a leak to go public with them.

Way to resist, libs.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #25516674 -

Today is a spectacular day for America.

God bless.


--------------------
TRUMP 2020

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: JHOVA] * 1
    #25516691 -

Is there anything to discuss anymore in this thead? Ford v Kavanaugh is a nonsense topic and has backfired against the democrats. 
Russian Collusion has backfired against the democrats.
This topic Kood should be talked about,  https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/25506794#25506794, but is so stupid that is isn't get talked about.

SO I am waiting for this country to collapse, everybody is dying and has been fucked up their butts by the Republicans, the economy is collapsing and the rich are stealing everybody ones money, people are dying in the streets because the republicans and Trump have killed healthcare, they are taxing and giving your money to big corporations, people are running wild in the streets and gunning people down--especially your kids in schools--the world war is just about to start, the US is getting to ready to invade Muslim countries and bring back the crusades, the Republicans and Trump, along with Big Corporations are poisoning the air and water, women are getting abused across the country, minorities are getting oppressed, a butt-hurt cry baby is about to become a Supreme, the R's killed democracy, they stole the election from Hillary, the are blaming the honorable FBI and the CIA for spying on the people.  Just picture that Concentration Camps are being prepared, so Cattle Cars on trains are going to roll up and started loading them up with gays and minority people, socialism and red commies, and other undesirables. All of this has been brought to you by Trump. 

Anything I have missed?  Please post it. :smirk:





--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: starfire_xes] * 2
    #25516743 -

Yeah lets back to real issues grounded in fact like q anon and pizzagate.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #25516809 -

The Ecstatic said:
Yeah lets back to real issues grounded in fact like q anon and pizzagate.


Whatever happened to that Russian investigation thing?  Koods said Trump was in BIG trouble.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: qman]
    #25516912 -

It's ongoing.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Enlil]
    #25517208 -



--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Trump
( 1 2 3 4 ... 131 132 )		 DividedQuantumM 79,537 2,635 01/19/21 07:19 AM
by STPLSD25
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 2070 2071 )		 XUL 485,497 41,419 09/04/26 02:04 PM
by lowbrow
* Toronto Mayor, crackhead?, Rob Ford (LOL!) Space Monkey 415 0 06/23/13 10:31 PM
by Space Monkey
* So Trump started off badly but he's making more sense every day...
( 1 2 3 4 ... 82 83 )		 Patlal 66,765 1,658 06/26/24 02:53 PM
by rxb
* Trump is a blowhard..... starfire_xes 948 11 08/14/15 03:35 PM
by hostileuniverse
* Trump is meeting the Mexican president
( 1 2 all )		 Patlal 1,903 23 09/04/16 04:46 PM
by Douglas Howard
* Ford knew of CIA coverup in Kennedy assassination Mushouse 884 8 11/26/07 07:54 PM
by ledfut
* Two Men Come Forward Claiming They Assaulted Ford, Not Kavanaugh Mycolorado 421 10 09/27/18 10:55 PM
by meltdowner

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
5,942 topic views. 4 members, 636 guests and 44 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.035 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 18 queries.