Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: JHOVA]
    #25515001 -

Trump was at 20% when he was elected?

Think about that for a second. Do you understand how ridiculous that statement is?


--------------------
NotSheekle said
โ€œif I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to herโ€

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: sh4d0ws]
    #25515013 -

I guess I should have elaborated. Yes. If he is in fact guilty of the accusation (not charges, because he has not been formally charged of any crime) then he should be punished severely as well. At this time he is still a federal circuit judge. That's not small potatoes. 

Fuck no I dont think his conduct should disqualify him. I personally think he is innocent of this. Her story is too vague. It has way too many holes in it for any jury to actually convict him. Keep in mind he's never been charged with any crime.


If I was wrongfully accused of such a serious crime of sexual assault, then youre goddamn right I would be furious.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa] * 1
    #25515028 -

What if you were correctly accused, but it was embarrassing for it to happen right as you were up for a new job?  Would you be angry and go on a tirade in front of the senate wherein you cry like a sissy while talking about a calendar and get angry that your victim dared to tell the truth?

Yeah, me neither.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Enlil]
    #25515042 -

If the victim was telling the truth dont you think she would have filed formal charges on him by now? Or was it purely political? Why did she go to her senator instead of the police dept? Coincidentally right before a major election. 36 years later when this alleged assault happened when they were both minors. Makes ya think doesn't it?

Also, where is her evidence? None of her witnesses corroborated her story at all. She has no case.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Edited by RomeoPapa (10/05/18 03:17 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25515051 -

I'm still waiting on what y'all think was in that envelope.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25515082 -

So would you or would you not cry like a little bitch if you were in Bretโ€™s position ?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Psilynut2]
    #25515094 -

Psilynut2 said:
So would you or would you not cry like a little bitch if you were in Bretโ€™s position ?


Idk how you want me to respond to this. If you're trying to get a dig in on me, you're going to have to try a little harder.

If this comment was directed towards me. If not, I apologize.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: koods]
    #25515112 -

It was pretty low lower, than obama bush and clinton. 42% depending on where you look. Approval ratings polls non voting polulation as well as those who vote. Splinternews has 58% turnout of eligible voters voted in 2016. Pretty low to me. 42% and won and now at 51% approval. Hes gonna win. Bernie is the most pooular leftist and hes not running. Whos gonna oppose trump please tell me? Pochahontas? Kamala harris? Bloomburg? Who  can appeal to i delendent voters? Who in the democratic party hasnt escortiated white working class โ€œdeplorablesโ€? Thats the problem with democrats they left the working class for racial and sexual identity politics that no normal people give a shit about. They cant run on economic issues when the economy is booming. Yea tax increases will really motivate people to go to the polls cuz meeping more of their own money sucks. :rofl:


--------------------
๐Ÿ…ƒ ๐Ÿ„ด ๐Ÿ„ฐ ๐Ÿ„ผ    ๐Ÿ„ฒ ๐Ÿ„ป ๐Ÿ„ธ ๐Ÿ„ฝ ๐Ÿ„ถ ๐Ÿ…† ๐Ÿ… ๐Ÿ„ฐ ๐Ÿ„ฟ

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25515147 -

Quote:
Idk how you want me to respond to this.


Would you or would you not cry like a little girl the way Bart did isnโ€™t an obvious yes or no question ?


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa] * 1
    #25515184 -

RomeoPapa said:
If the victim was telling the truth dont you think she would have filed formal charges on him by now?

Why?  Statute of limitations ran decades ago.  No charges can be brought.  Or are you one of those guys who thinks that 14 year old girls report every sexual assault right away?

Quote:
Or was it purely political?

I don't see it as political at all.
Quote:
Why did she go to her senator instead of the police dept?

Maybe because the police can't do anything after statute of limitation has run.
Quote:
Coincidentally right before a major election. 36 years later when this alleged assault happened when they were both minors. Makes ya think doesn't it?

Makes me think that she never wanted it to come to light at all, but after seeing that her attempted rapist was about to be made a Supreme Court Justice, she felt that she had to come forward despite not wanting to.
Quote:
Also, where is her evidence? None of her witnesses corroborated her story at all. She has no case.

She testified.  That's evidence.  That's as much evidence as he has.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Enlil] * 2
    #25515257 -

Your first statement answered all my questions. All shes doing now is a smear campaign brought on by Feinstein and the Far left. Theres motives going on behind the scene. Her father has ties to the CIA.

He's already on the second highest court. Why not accuse him when he was being vetted for that position.

This is nothing more than a last ditch effort to block Trump from putting his pick on the SC. It's going to backfire badly.

When Trump is reelected in 20 he will put another one on too. Ruth is on her last leg.

Good luck with your campaign of spreading hate and discontent and not bringing anything of value to the table for the American people.


--------------------
It's better to have it and not need it
Than it is to need it and not have it.


Edited by RomeoPapa (10/05/18 04:57 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa]
    #25515359 -

THE Statute of limitations was one year.  Also, the FBI has no jurisdiction in this case.  All you knuckleheads got played by the democrats.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: RomeoPapa] * 2
    #25515397 -

RomeoPapa said:
Good luck with your campaign of spreading hate and discontent and not bringing anything of value to the table for the American people.


Are you talking about Trump?


--------------------
๐Ÿ…‚๐Ÿ„ธ๐Ÿ„ถ๐Ÿ„ผ๐Ÿ„ฐ


Helpful Threads
stonesun
Mycoloradoโ€™s Tamp Fruit Project
Tampanensis Grow with Mycolorado
bw86's Jalisco Grow

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Mycolorado]
    #25515427 -

Trump is full of hate.  He sure hates unemployment. Been murdering it quickly. The madman.


--------------------
๐Ÿ…ƒ ๐Ÿ„ด ๐Ÿ„ฐ ๐Ÿ„ผ    ๐Ÿ„ฒ ๐Ÿ„ป ๐Ÿ„ธ ๐Ÿ„ฝ ๐Ÿ„ถ ๐Ÿ…† ๐Ÿ… ๐Ÿ„ฐ ๐Ÿ„ฟ

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: JHOVA]
    #25515514 -

He is full of hate.  :shrug:  You understand, administrations inherit the current economy from the previous administration and the state the nation was in, right?  Itโ€™s always been that way.  Weโ€™ll start to see the effects of Trumps policies in the next couple years.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/12/14/comparing-the-trump-economy-to-the-obama-economy/


--------------------
๐Ÿ…‚๐Ÿ„ธ๐Ÿ„ถ๐Ÿ„ผ๐Ÿ„ฐ


Helpful Threads
stonesun
Mycoloradoโ€™s Tamp Fruit Project
Tampanensis Grow with Mycolorado
bw86's Jalisco Grow

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: Mycolorado]
    #25515520 -

Ill be happy when its 2 years in and we are kicking chinas ass and they bend the knee. It worked for the usmc trade deal, korea, and next china. That or we go to war with them realistically.


--------------------
๐Ÿ…ƒ ๐Ÿ„ด ๐Ÿ„ฐ ๐Ÿ„ผ    ๐Ÿ„ฒ ๐Ÿ„ป ๐Ÿ„ธ ๐Ÿ„ฝ ๐Ÿ„ถ ๐Ÿ…† ๐Ÿ… ๐Ÿ„ฐ ๐Ÿ„ฟ

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: starfire_xes]
    #25515548 -

Dude. Only 134k Jobs were created last month. 3.7% unemployment is a very precarious position when youโ€™re not adding a lot of jobs.

Lol. USMC is just NAFTA with a name change, with a little TPP thrown in. Trump is an awful negotiator.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
โ€œif I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to herโ€

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: koods]
    #25515823 -

You didnt read it at all. Its good for mexicans and americans and opens canada to our dairy market.


--------------------
๐Ÿ…ƒ ๐Ÿ„ด ๐Ÿ„ฐ ๐Ÿ„ผ    ๐Ÿ„ฒ ๐Ÿ„ป ๐Ÿ„ธ ๐Ÿ„ฝ ๐Ÿ„ถ ๐Ÿ…† ๐Ÿ… ๐Ÿ„ฐ ๐Ÿ„ฟ

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: JHOVA] * 1
    #25515826 -

Yeah it mandates a minimum wage for Mexicans in certain industries. Funny how we canโ€™t get a deal like that here.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
โ€œif I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to herโ€

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Ford v Kavanaugh [Re: JHOVA] * 1
    #25515950 -

JHOVA said:
You didnt read it at all. Its good for mexicans and americans and opens canada to our dairy market.


If any democrat was pushing a trade deal that purported to help mexicans trump would be foaming at the mouth about how evil it was.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Trump
( 1 2 3 4 ... 131 132 )		 DividedQuantumM 79,712 2,635 01/19/21 07:19 AM
by STPLSD25
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 2071 2072 )		 XUL 488,540 41,436 09/07/26 05:09 PM
by durian_2008
* Toronto Mayor, crackhead?, Rob Ford (LOL!) Space Monkey 417 0 06/23/13 10:31 PM
by Space Monkey
* So Trump started off badly but he's making more sense every day...
( 1 2 3 4 ... 82 83 )		 Patlal 66,872 1,658 06/26/24 02:53 PM
by rxb
* Trump is a blowhard..... starfire_xes 948 11 08/14/15 03:35 PM
by hostileuniverse
* Trump is meeting the Mexican president
( 1 2 all )		 Patlal 1,907 23 09/04/16 04:46 PM
by Douglas Howard
* Ford knew of CIA coverup in Kennedy assassination Mushouse 885 8 11/26/07 07:54 PM
by ledfut
* Two Men Come Forward Claiming They Assaulted Ford, Not Kavanaugh Mycolorado 421 10 09/27/18 10:55 PM
by meltdowner

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
6,078 topic views. 4 members, 344 guests and 60 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.03 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.