Quote:

But the people who put together these anti-intellectual screeds are about as bad and disingenuous as the mouth-foaming Wahhabists.

---

Hobozen said:

Quote:

But the people who put together these anti-intellectual screeds are about as bad and disingenuous as the mouth-foaming Wahhabists.

---

Oh please... You're comparing him to murderous Wahhabis? Come on now...

---

Quote:

But I reject this morbid fascination with ethnicity and national essentialism. Humans are cosmopolitan and cosmopolitan societies thrive (when they're not being threatened by racists and obscurantists).

---

Quote:

The Political Cuck

The word ‘cuck’ gets used a lot lately. Many people have taken a try at describing the phenomenon, but I think all existing descriptions of ‘cuck’ miss why the point and the power of the word. They miss why ‘cuck’ is not merely a modern ‘faggot’ or ‘hippy,’ but actually something much stronger. The perfect description for a modern epidemic that is destroying our nations, our societies, and our souls.

To understand why ‘cuck’ is so powerful, we need to understand its origins and literal meaning. The word cuck is a short for cuckold, which is a man whose wife is cheating on him. More specifically, in modern usage, a cuckold is a man who KNOWINGLY ALLOWS his wife to cheat on him – either because he gains pleasure from it or because he is too weak or cowardly to stop it. But this is not the original source of ‘cuck,’ nor the one that best describes why ‘cuck’ is the perfect description for the modern age.

The term cuckold itself comes from the cuckoo bird: a bird that is a brood parasite. The cuckoo bird lays its eggs in the nests of other birds. Once the egg hatches, the young cuckoo will swiftly destroy or eat most or all of the nest’s original inhabitants. The parents of these murdered young who come back to a nest with a baby cuckoo in it will ignore the carnage, and dutifully raise the young cuckoo as if it is their own chick. Indeed, because cuckoos are often much larger than the birds whose nests they parasitize, it is possible for cucked parents to literally starve as they struggle to provide for the murderer of their real children.

In both cases, human and bird, we have a subject which has utterly abandoned the self-interest of itself and of its kin in the favor of others – often the very others who have wronged them.

You may wonder: why do cucked birds not fight back, or abandon the cuckoo? There are many reasons. Some birds seem to genuinely be unable to tell that the cuckoo is, in fact, not their own. You might think this would be a uniquely avian feature – but see human ‘cucks’ who seem completely unable to differentiate between foreigners and their own kith and kin when deciding who is deserving of aid and alliance.

Other birds are aware of the dangers cuckoo’s pose, and will try to destroy cuckoo eggs and chicks when they find them in their nests. Cuckoo birds have a strategy for dealing with this, however. Although cuckoo birds refuse to raise their own young, they are not above providing some amount of parental protection. When they find that one of their eggs has been removed from a nest they have parasitized, they immediately destroy the entire nest, and attack the smaller parents, often killing them. With such a threat hanging over their heads, it’s little wonder that small birds so strenuously provide for the cuckoo in their midst. And after all, sometimes a young cuckoo might leave one or two of the original brood alive. Imagine those young birds for a moment. Aren’t those young birds lucky to be so culturally enriched as to have a kind cuckoo brother in their nest? And although the cuckoo will take the lion’s share of the food and space in the nest, those other birds really shouldn’t be so selfish. After all, it’s not like cuckoos can build nests of their own!

In this context, it is easy to see just why ‘cuck’ is absolutely appropriate to a certain breed of today’s politicians. A cuck politician is a cuck when he or she takes pleasure in his nation’s people being cheated on. He gains political standing and a sense of moral superiority when he allows poor little cuckoo birds to roost in his nations cities and towns. A cuck politician is also a cuck because he knows that if he were ever to act against the cuckoos in his midst, he would invite disaster. Riots, terrorism, beheadings… And, of course, the approbation of his fellows cucks.

And our nations ARE run by cucks. Let there be no doubt about it. Cucks in both senses of the word: they refuse to recognize their enemy, and they can great pleasure in siding with him against their own countrymen.

Cuckoldry has become an entire mindset. The modern cuck is not a cuck only in one circumstance, but in ALL circumstances.

---

Hobozen said:

I was just partying with some Sikhs the other week, i asked them what they thought of Muslims. They hate them, and talked about how they've had to fight them off in India in the past. Indians are alright, same with asians. Lots of them in my city too. But i don't trust Muslims. If self-preservation is racism than i guess I'm a racist.

---

DieCommie said:

Some cultures can live together, others cant.  Some culture's differences are superficial - like food, music and style of dress.  Other cultural differences are fundamental - like secular govt., women's rights, tolerance, and skepticism.

---

Lion said:

DieCommie said:

Some cultures can live together, others cant.  Some culture's differences are superficial - like food, music and style of dress.  Other cultural differences are fundamental - like secular govt., women's rights, tolerance, and skepticism.

---

Is it impossible for you and people of your culture to live in proximity with the people of Lubbock, Texas, or Boise, Idaho?

---

DieCommie said:

Lion said:

DieCommie said:

Some cultures can live together, others cant.  Some culture's differences are superficial - like food, music and style of dress.  Other cultural differences are fundamental - like secular govt., women's rights, tolerance, and skepticism.

---

Is it impossible for you and people of your culture to live in proximity with the people of Lubbock, Texas, or Boise, Idaho?

---

Probably.  Well, impossible is a strong word.  I assume those places are notorious for religion, intolerance and the like?  I'm sure I would have a very difficult time living in such an area.  My family culture strongly values secular govt., women's rights, tolerance, and skepticism.

But I don't for a second believe that mainstream culture in Lubbock or Boise is anywhere near as intolerant as mainstream muslim culture.

---

Lion said:

Please keep this "cuck" and "muh this and that" stuff out of this forum. There's enough of this anti-intellectual slang floating around on social media and it's not going to be compelling to anyone here.

---

Quote:

The Japanese also have a latent morbid nationalism, yes. Their nationalism resulted in the deaths of many thousands of innocents in WWII and it's rearing its head again now.

---

Quote:

They have a high quality of life in many ways, but they also have things like toxic work culture, epidemics of mental illness, social isolation and more low rates of sexual activity among their young people.

---

Quote:

I'll say it again: ethnic nationalism, which is what you are advocating, is ahistorical and adds nothing interesting to these challenging issues. You're apparently from Sweden but if you do a DNA test you'll probably find Ireland, Poland, Sicily, who knows what else.

---

Lion said:

I am maybe too emotionally invested to argue well on this issue. I see a thousand layers of nuance when it comes to geopolitics, history, and individual countries' present situations, what valence of people's minds confessed beliefs are actually operating at, not to mention all the daunting historical and legal complexities of immigration, population mobility, etc. I get furious when I see the social media discourse that happens where everyone is an Islam apologist or Islamophobe. There's a big gulf to be crossed there.

---

Hobozen said:

Lion said:

I am maybe too emotionally invested to argue well on this issue. I see a thousand layers of nuance when it comes to geopolitics, history, and individual countries' present situations, what valence of people's minds confessed beliefs are actually operating at, not to mention all the daunting historical and legal complexities of immigration, population mobility, etc. I get furious when I see the social media discourse that happens where everyone is an Islam apologist or Islamophobe. There's a big gulf to be crossed there.

---

In other words, you just wanted to pick a fight because you don't like the way other people talk. I take it that's why you constantly slander my posts as being anti-intellectual and racist. Because deep down that's all you got. Not all of us are intellectual snobs, some of us just like to shoot the shit.

---