Looking at the history of the theory entropy, it began only as the rate of heat dissipation in heated gasses, nothing else. It was later once mathematicians began to play with concepts, not natural philosophers and physicists, that concepts of order and chaos crept in. These added concpets have no actual bearing on reality. The issues around entropy began because in many respects Newton was incomplete with his examination of physical processes. Had the investigators of the properties of heated gasses looked toward Faraday and Maxwell for electromagnetic interactions and electrical effects and John Keely for sympathetic vibratory physics, they would not have seen randomness in the movement of the particles as they reached thermal equilibrium, but a different mechanism of particle interaction.
Entropy, as described by Claude Shannon, is largely a mathematical fiction. During the 20th century, after Irving Langmuir invented his probe (Langmuir probe) it became possible to easily detect the perturbations of excited gasses and determine their electromagnetic properties. This gave rise to Plasma Physics, which is largely not taught even in Phd astrophysics, yet it is the most prevalent form of matter in the universe. Since mainstream science has never really looked into the properties of plasma physics they are still in the dark about much of mechanisms of the universe, hence the continual flood of press releases of failed studies and surprising findings that the standard model theory failed to predict. The theory has degraded to the point that is should have been abandoned decades ago when Hannes Alfven proposed his new model of cosmology, but it has been ignored for pride and money and dogmatism.
Entropy, as order and chaos, is a mathematical mythology that has some, but limited actual occurrence in nature. Instead of following prescribed empirical scientific protocols once Newton's theories began to reach their limits of usefulness, mathematicians began expanding the uses of statistics and probability. What came next was a mostly useless sea of bad information collection from indeterminate noise due to a lack of understanding of the systems being examined. This has led to entire branches of medical and scientific study that are based on faulty premises and scientific research that cannot be repeated or confirmed.
Through the lens of Plasma Physics the universe is an open system, not closed. Energy dissipates from one area and moves to another and will eventually flow somewhere else, possibly back into the area where it was first measured. Only in a laboratory setting using only limited Newtonian dynamics will anyone find a closed system.
The Universe is made up of 99.999% Plasma, and that plasma is electromagnetically active. The force of electromagnetics in the plasma can be as much as 10^39 times more powerful than any measured gravity. Through plasma structures like Birkeland Currents that electromagnetic force can be carried millions of light years. Using these calculations it is possible to account for the formation and rotation of the galaxies and practically every other celestial structure without introducing relativity, entropy, dark matter, black holes, or a big bang. All of those features of the standard model theory of physics are adhoc inventive mathematical attempts to save the failing Newtonian mechanics.
Newton had no causation for gravity, only guesses and adhoc attempts to patch up the short comings of his work. In the decades and centuries that followed his establishment of physical theories, it was found that gravity is not constant and it has a different measurement in different areas of the earth. Inertia is also not a constant, neither is the speed of light, and most other constants vary as measurements are repeated. The dogmatic adherence to Newtonian dynamics has led to an increased level of confusion in physical theory. Most of Quantum Mechanics is confusing mythology with no use in the physical world. Particle physics is mostly irrelevant, and relativity was only a thought experiment with no correlation to reality as admitted by its creator Einstein.
They are all beautiful and complex theories and the math seems to work, but it is not based on empirical science. It is deductive logic that used mathematics to create a vision of what the theoretician wants the universe to be like, not what it actually is.
So, while your musings are interesting, they don't appear to have any actual use when compared to more recent observations of the cosmos and reality through the lens of a more sophisticated plasma physical view of what exists and can be empirically tested in laboratories and observed with the full compliment of technology invented to examine the skies. Because of the complex politics of the modern academic and research paradigms it is almost impossible to present the established system with new ideas the have become so calcified and entrenched. Instead of allowing science to correct itself, tenured professors and voracious skeptics will go out of their way to destroy the careers of even the most humble and well meaning scientist who has a well documented and defensible view. It is a tragedy really, but one that hopefully continued pressure from the growing community of dissident thinkers will overcome in then next decade or so.
Quotes on science
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. - Max Planck
New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.” - Max Plank
History shows clearly that the advances of science have always been frustrated by the tyrannical influences of certain preconceived notions which were turned into unassailable dogmas. For that reason alone, every serious scientist should periodically make a profound reexamination of his basic principles.
—Louis de Broglie New Perspectives in Physics Basic Books, New York, 1962
Some interestign documentaries about the state of science and its reporting to the public.
https://www.youtube.com/user/ouroboros3712/playlists
and some reading on the issues
http://milesmathis.com/ent.html
http://www.compilerpress.ca/Competitiveness/Anno/Anno%20Polanyi%20Scientific%20Beliefs%20Ethics%201950.htm
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress
http://philpapers.org/archive/HOLTDO-13.pdf
--------------------
"-" egoproctor
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order 
Bulk Cannabis Seeds 
Cultivation Supplies 
Spores for European Microscopy 
All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck 
Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale
trendal
David_Scape 
Edit 
Reply 
1 2 all )
trendal
OneWhoHasSeen
raytrace
DoctorJ
ChubbSubb
Swami
Tasty_Smurf_House
Diploid