Unlike agriculture, which is adapted to our mass, sedentary society, oil is not essential to our livelihood, whereas farming has become the basis of our sustenance. I could live without oil, I cannot live without the food we cultivate, and I could even cultivate my own food anyway.
I never said that it would be an easy transition, in my first post to you in an earlier thread I said there would be a depression and hard times, but I think that the government would declare martial law to quell the situation and then work from there. Until it actually happens it is hard to predict exactly how it will go down, but the absence of oil does not mean that we will turn into savages hell bent on getting whatever oil is left while ignoring the opportunities to change the course of energy usage.
The AVERAGE PERSON that supports the war does not support it knowing that it is partly to secure energy resources. In their blindness from 911 propaganda, they really believe that it was mostly all due to WMDs, and to save the Iraqi people. And you should be aware that we did not only go into Iraq to secure oil resources, but also to expand our market through the distribution of mass produced goods and franchise markets, to gain another strategic military position, and to knock out another piece of the Muslim world on the road toward a socialist/NWO one world government.
It does not matter if it even comes to a point where people are starving and dying, rallying sentiments to support an attack (in this case nuclear) will always work off the same principle- it depends on how good a lie (case) a leader can sell his/her people. The powerful have to fool the people into supporting them, so I will not rule out that possibility that the masses will concur with a nuclear attack, because I have to wait and see what lies the government tries to sell. I am thinking hopefully, by this point, the masses will realize the bullshit fed to them on a daily basis and start to awaken, and say we have had enough we just want to live peaceful and simple. Maybe that is too optimistic. Again, until the situation unfolds we can only speculate, the masses are fickle when they are not happy.
The EU, China, and Russia cannot afford, nor have any ambitions to forcefully question our actions in Iraq at this point. A) the system is still running fairly smooth to change world politics at this point and B) they are not well organized amongst themselves and their people yet to stage a cold war against the United States, and if they did, they would have millions of bloodthirsty Americans saying nuke them. The world structure is still running smoothly enough to let things ride a little longer. I am sure they are building alliances as we speak though.
Yeah, I could see military service becoming a main option of employment, but in the case that it does not, there will be a draft. You cannot take the Middle East simply by bombing it if it came down to superpowers jockeying for oil resources.
It is pretty much common knowledge that the EU is trying to build an army and source power in order to have the option of challenging the Unites States in future conflicts of interest. How successful they will be remains to be seen. Here is one (completely off the wall) scenario I was thinking could take place. We let China claim Taiwan, whereas they help us outmuscle North Korea, leading to an alliance between the United States, China, and Japan. North Korea would be buried in rebuilding, but since there will be so many other focuses and drains on revenue it would lead to hell for the people there. Then Possibly Russia gets into energy wars with China and the United States and joins with a newly united Arab world. The Arab world and Russia move into Europe, leaving Europe, which tried to stay neutral, with no choice other than to join with the United States. The Arab world, through means to existence also allies with Pakistan, whereas India allies with the US/China/Russia. A great war takes place in which nuclear devices are detonated on United States soil. The end is either the apocalypse, or the final realization of a one-world government. I know it is crazy, I am just throwing something out there.
I assumed that since you are claiming we are dangerously low on oil, then naturally you are saying the geologists and industrialists estimates are either very far off, or they are manipulated. Production wise, I do not think we will have a problem getting oil out.
|