OrgoneConclusion said:

Quote:

based on this retarded logic, we need to ban cars

---

Not sure to what logic you are referring or where I mentioned a ban. Reading what was not written could be a sign of neurological issues.


By Associated Press
updated 12/30/2014 AT 10:30 PM EST
•originally published 12/30/2014 AT 04:15 PM EST


A 2-year-old boy accidentally shot and killed his mother after he reached into her purse at a northern Idaho Walmart and her concealed gun fired, authorities said Tuesday.

Veronica J. Rutledge, 29, was shopping with her son and three other children, Kootenai County sheriff's spokesman Stu Miller said. Rutledge was from Blackfoot in southeastern Idaho, and her family had come to the area to visit relatives.

She had a concealed weapons permit to protect herself from bad guys. Miller said the young boy was left in a shopping cart, reached into his mother's purse and grabbed a small-caliber handgun, which discharged one time.

Deputies who responded to the Walmart found Rutledge dead, the sheriff's office said.


Prosecutors are deciding whether or not to try the toddler as an adult.


*Irony Alert*

Rutledge was a member of the conservative women’s group the Independent Women’s Forum. They say that a ban on high-capacity magazines would hurt a woman’s ability to fight back against potential attackers.

In a statement, IWF senior fellow Anna Rittgers suggested that by banning high-capacity magazines and semiautomatic weapons, women will not be able to fight back. ”It often takes several shots to stop one attacker,” Rittgers writes. “If the maximum magazine capacity is 10 (or if all semiautomatic handguns are banned, but 6 shot revolvers remain), and a woman in danger has to stop and reload her weapon while trying to protect her children (who are likely hysterical at this point), it gives the bad guy an opportunity to react–potentially fatally.”

Problem was - she had a low capacity pistol.

---

OrgoneConclusion said:

How many times was Mike Brown shot with a .40 before he was stopped?

I personally carry a Neutralizer.



One blast of gamma radiation does the trick.

---

Rebelutionsssss said:

Not with some low velocity hollow points. Plus you can carry more rounds of .40 in a normal magazine

---

True.

I'd be curious to know what he had fired into him.
FMJ would have made a clean hole, leaving the man walking.


I was just stating generalities in that previous post though.

Acaterpillar said:

OrgoneConclusion said:

How many times was Mike Brown shot with a .40 before he was stopped?

I personally carry a Neutralizer.



One blast of gamma radiation does the trick.

---

Yeah a .45 would have been more appropriate for that situation.

40acp has a much higher velocity and so it penetrates the target with a clean wound; and leaves them standing upright.
Which is why with 40acp, a calm and accurate shot is all that is needed.
Clearly the officer was incapable of remaining calm; or else he probably would have resorted to non-fatal shots.

.45 will knock someone off their feet.
It's a much slower round, and carries more mass. So it won't make a clean penetration, and the mass will deliver the force of the round through the whole body.

That's why with .45 it doesn't need to be accurate, just hit them in the torso. The force carried by that mass with the slower velocity will knock almost anyone off their feet.

---

Herbologist said:

idiots are idiots.  i'll always own firearms, because of the idiots

---

Acaterpillar said:

OrgoneConclusion said:

How many times was Mike Brown shot with a .40 before he was stopped?

I personally carry a Neutralizer.



One blast of gamma radiation does the trick.

---

Yeah a .45 would have been more appropriate for that situation.

40acp has a much higher velocity and so it penetrates the target with a clean wound; and leaves them standing upright.
Which is why with 40acp, a calm and accurate shot is all that is needed.
Clearly the officer was incapable of remaining calm; or else he probably would have resorted to non-fatal shots.

.45 will knock someone off their feet.
It's a much slower round, and carries more mass. So it won't make a clean penetration, and the mass will deliver the force of the round through the whole body.

That's why with .45 it doesn't need to be accurate, just hit them in the torso. The force carried by that mass with the slower velocity will knock almost anyone off their feet.

---

Quote:

is the cause of someone mishandling a gun properly

---

I did not know that there was a proper and an improper way to mishandle a gun.

occollegeboi said:

Let's just end guns and weapons all together. Besides, only pussies use weapons anyway. We can fight wars and everything else with our FISTS.

---

jahrastafareye said:

Fact of the day : Guns don't kill people, bullets do.

---