Home | Community | Message Board


Marijuana Demystified
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
OfflineEchoVortex
(hard) member
Registered: 02/06/02
Posts: 859
Last seen: 8 years, 11 months
Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right
    #1465848 - 04/17/03 01:17 AM (14 years, 5 months ago)

by Arianna Huffington

The Bible tells us that pride goeth before the fall. In Iraq, it cameth right after it.

From the moment that statue of Saddam hit the ground, the mood around the Rumsfeld campfire has been all high-fives, I-told-you-sos, and endless smug prattling about how the speedy fall of Baghdad is proof positive that those who opposed the invasion of Iraq were dead wrong.

What utter nonsense. In fact, the speedy fall of Baghdad proves the anti-war movement was dead right.

The whole pretext for our unilateral charge into Iraq was that the American people were in imminent danger from Saddam and his mighty war machine. The threat was so clear and present that we couldn't even give inspectors searching for weapons of mass destruction -- hey, remember those? -- another 30 days, as France had wanted.

Well, it turns out that, far from being on the verge of destroying Western civilization, Saddam and his 21st century Gestapo couldn't even muster a half-hearted defense of their own capital. The hawks' cakewalk disproves their own dire warnings. They can't have it both ways. The invasion has proved wildly successful in one other regard: It has unified most of the world -- especially the Arab world -- against us.

Back in 1991, more than half-a-dozen Arab nations were part of our Desert Storm coalition. Operation Iraqi Freedom's "coalition of the willing" had zero. Not even the polygamous potentates of Kuwait -- whose butts we saved last time out and who were most threatened by whatever threat Iraq still presented -- would join us. And, I'm sorry, but substituting Bulgaria and the island of Tonga for Egypt and Oman is just not going to cut it when it comes to winning hearts and minds on the Arab street.

In fact, almost everything about the invasion -- from the go-it-alone build-up to the mayhem the fall of Saddam has unleashed -- has played right into the hands of those intent on demonizing our country. Islamic extremists must be having a field day signing up recruits for the holy war they're preparing to wage against us. Instead of Uncle Sam wants you, their recruiting posters feature a different kind of patriotic image: an American soldier ill-advisedly draping the American flag over Saddam's face.

The anti-war movement did not oppose the war out of fear that America was going to lose. It was the Bush administration's pathological and frantic obsession with an immediate, damn-the-consequences invasion that fueled the protests.

And please don't point to jubilant Iraqis dancing in the streets to validate the case for "pre-emptive liberation." You'd be doing the Baghdad Bugaloo too if the murderous tyrant who'd been eating off golden plates while your family starved finally got what was coming to him. It in no way proves that running roughshod over international law and pouring Iraqi oil -- now brought to you by the good folks at Halliburton -- onto the flames of anti-American hatred was a good idea. It wasn't before the war, and it still isn't now. The unintended consequences have barely begun to unfold.

And the idea that our slamdunk of Saddam actually proves the White House was right is particularly dangerous because it encourages the Wolfowitzes and the Perles and the Cheneys to argue that we should be invading Syria or Iran or North Korea or Cuba as soon as we catch our breath. They've tasted blood.

It's important to remember that the Arab world has seen a very different war than we have. They are seeing babies with limbs blown off, children wailing beside their dead mothers, Arab journalists killed by American tanks and bombers, holy men hacked to death and dragged through the streets. They are seeing American forces leaving behind a wake of destruction, looting, hunger, humiliation, and chaos.

Who's been handling our war PR, Osama bin Laden? The language and imagery are all wrong. Having Tom DeLay gush about our "army of virtue" at the same time we're blowing up mosques is definitely not sending the right message to a Muslim world already suspicious that we're waging a war on Islam.

Neither is Ari Fleischer's claim that the administration can't do anything to keep Christian missionaries -- including those who have described the Islamic prophet Muhammad as a "demon-possessed pedophile" and a "terrorist" -- from going on a holy crusade to Baghdad. You think the Arab world might take that the wrong way? If there is one thing that could bring Sunnis and Shiites together, it's the common hatred of evangelical zealots who denigrate their prophet.

And it doesn't help to have the American media referring to Jay Garner, the retired general Don Rumsfeld picked to oversee the rebuilding of Iraq, as "viceroy." It reeks of colonial imperialism. Why not just call him "Head Bwana?" Or "Garner of Arabia?" I didn't realize the Supreme Court had handed Bush a scepter to go along with the Florida recount.

The powerful role that shame and humiliation have played in shaping world history is considerable, but something the Bush team seems utterly clueless about. Which is why the anti-war movement must be stalwart in its refusal to be silenced or browbeaten by the gloating "I told you so" chorus on the right. On the contrary, it needs to make sure that the doctrine of preemptive invasion is forever buried in the sands of Iraq.

Especially as the administration, high on the heady fumes of Saddam's ouster, turns its covetous eyes on Syria. I give it less than a week before someone starts making the case that President Assad is the next, next Hitler.



Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: EchoVortex]
    #1465898 - 04/17/03 01:33 AM (14 years, 5 months ago)

yesssssssss


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineEllis Dee
Archangel
Male User Gallery Arcade Champion: Duck Hunt, Enemy Enforcer

Registered: 06/30/01
Posts: 13,104
Loc: Fire in the sky
Last seen: 1 day, 7 hours
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: EchoVortex]
    #1466144 - 04/17/03 03:40 AM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Time will tell, we'll have to wait and see. Liberal democracy might flourish in Iraq, or it might not. While we're waiting Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait will get "regime changed", one at a time.


--------------------
"If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do."-King Solomon

And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezeronio
Stranger
Male

Registered: 10/16/01
Posts: 2,349
Loc: Slovenia
Last seen: 1 year, 18 days
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: Ellis Dee]
    #1466330 - 04/17/03 07:26 AM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Iran is acutally more democratic then other countires in the region.
Iran?s election


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineLearyfan
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 30,236
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 3 hours, 2 minutes
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: EchoVortex]
    #1466381 - 04/17/03 08:11 AM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Good read.

And Arianna Huffington is hot by the way.



--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month: Johnny Price- Marijuana, The Devil Flower



Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineGazzBut
Refraction

Registered: 10/15/02
Posts: 4,770
Loc: London UK
Last seen: 2 months, 8 days
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: EchoVortex]
    #1466763 - 04/17/03 11:26 AM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Dats a cracker!  :grin: 


--------------------
Always Smi2le


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinegrib
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/01/03
Posts: 550
Loc: Here and there
Last seen: 3 years, 3 months
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: EchoVortex]
    #1466868 - 04/17/03 12:18 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

It's important to remember that the Arab world has seen a very different war than we have. They are seeing babies with limbs blown off, children wailing beside their dead mothers, Arab journalists killed by American tanks and bombers, holy men hacked to death and dragged through the streets. They are seeing American forces leaving behind a wake of destruction, looting, hunger, humiliation, and chaos.




very true... and I wonder if support here would be as high as the 'polls' indicate they are if American media had not censored the realities of the war.


--------------------
<~>Our truest life is when we are in dreams awake <~>


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleBuddha5254
addict
Registered: 04/23/00
Posts: 532
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: Ellis Dee]
    #1467035 - 04/17/03 01:32 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

liberal democracy doesnt even flourish here


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineEllis Dee
Archangel
Male User Gallery Arcade Champion: Duck Hunt, Enemy Enforcer

Registered: 06/30/01
Posts: 13,104
Loc: Fire in the sky
Last seen: 1 day, 7 hours
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: zeronio]
    #1467105 - 04/17/03 01:53 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Irrelavent, Iran is an oppressive nation which activly sponsors terrorism. They will be "regime changed".


--------------------
"If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do."-King Solomon

And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineRonoS
DSYSB since '01
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/26/01
Posts: 16,243
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Last seen: 15 days, 8 hours
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: Ellis Dee]
    #1467118 - 04/17/03 01:57 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

oppressive nation which activly sponsors terrorism


Bush's description of every middle east oil producing nation... :grin:


--------------------
"Life has never been weird enough for my liking"


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineflow
outlaw immortal
Registered: 11/20/02
Posts: 496
Last seen: 2 years, 8 months
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: EchoVortex]
    #1467358 - 04/17/03 03:23 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

didn't expect much better from her
Quote:

holy men hacked to death and dragged through the streets.



where is she pulling this from?

how does the quick fall of iraq prove anything? I think she missed the point of why saddam was a danger in the first place. of course the victory was going to be quick and relatively easy, didn't the entire administration say this in the first place? the real danger of saddam with WMD is not that he was going to attack the US with them, but he was going to sell them to terrorist who would attack the US. big difference. he didn't need a big military for the second option.
Quote:

Islamic extremists must be having a field day signing up recruits for the holy war they're preparing to wage against us.



probably, but is this happening in Iraq anymore? Nope. of course i can't say for certain, but i doubt it. And the countries that allow these sorts of things will be taken care of in a matter of time. We're going to see an end to state-sponsered terrorism in the middle east pretty quickly.
Quote:

Neither is Ari Fleischer's claim that the administration can't do anything to keep Christian missionaries -- including those who have described the Islamic prophet Muhammad as a "demon-possessed pedophile" and a "terrorist" -- from going on a holy crusade to Baghdad.



what the hell can the administration do?? what about free speech? was the administration able to stop the human sheilds from going to iraq? and who is planning a "holy crusade"? wtf is she talking about?
Quote:

And it doesn't help to have the American media referring to Jay Garner, the retired general Don Rumsfeld picked to oversee the rebuilding of Iraq, as "viceroy."



is it just me or is she really nit-picking here? what the hell does it matter what we call him?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineflow
outlaw immortal
Registered: 11/20/02
Posts: 496
Last seen: 2 years, 8 months
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: grib]
    #1467374 - 04/17/03 03:29 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

very true... and I wonder if support here would be as high as the 'polls' indicate they are if American media had not censored the realities of the war.



how did they censor the reality of the war? by not showing mangled bodies? do you think that americans need to see these things to know that people died? Al-jazeera and many other arab media sources concentrated on these things. there main argument against the war was these pictures, and they showed every single one that they could.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: Ellis Dee]
    #1467376 - 04/17/03 03:29 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

democracy might flourish in Iraq, or it might not.

even if it does, that doesn't mean that it won't involve islamic fundamentalism, with all its oppression and misogyny.

While we're waiting Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait will get "regime changed", one at a time.

doubtful. maaaaybe syria.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblesilversoul7
Chill the FuckOut!
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/10/02
Posts: 27,301
Loc: mndfreeze's puppet army
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: flow]
    #1467380 - 04/17/03 03:30 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Quote:

Islamic extremists must be having a field day signing up recruits for the holy war they're preparing to wage against us.



probably, but is this happening in Iraq anymore? Nope. of course i can't say for certain, but i doubt it. And the countries that allow these sorts of things will be taken care of in a matter of time. We're going to see an end to state-sponsered terrorism in the middle east pretty quickly.



Even if every government stopped sponsoring terrorism(which is almost impossible without us conquering the world), there are certain countries where the government doesn't have a very firm control over the populace except in certain areas. Terrorism will thrive as long as we continue give the terrorists a reason to attack us.


--------------------


"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinepattern
multiplayer

Registered: 07/19/02
Posts: 2,183
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 2 years, 6 months
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: silversoul7]
    #1467385 - 04/17/03 03:32 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

> do you think that americans need to see these things to know that people died?

Yes.


--------------------
man = monkey + mushroom


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEvolving
Resident Cynic

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: silversoul7]
    #1467424 - 04/17/03 03:47 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Terrorism will thrive as long as we continue give the terrorists a reason to attack us.



Do you mean, bring home U.S. troops from the approx 130 or 140 countires they're stationed in BESIDES THE U.S.?

Do you mean, stop giving money to foreign governments so their people won't perceive the U.S. as funding their oppressors?

Do you mean, stop using the U.S. military to make sure foreign countries are 'friendly' to U.S. business operations outside of the U.S. borders and not in international waters?

Do you mean, stop having the U.S. government fund foreign military operations in the name of combating 'the war on drugs?'

Do you mean stop having the U.S. government subsidizing U.S.business operations to promote them overseas?


--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.'  Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence.  Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains.  Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.


Edited by Evolving (04/17/03 03:52 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineflow
outlaw immortal
Registered: 11/20/02
Posts: 496
Last seen: 2 years, 8 months
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: silversoul7]
    #1467426 - 04/17/03 03:47 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Even if every government stopped sponsoring terrorism(which is almost impossible without us conquering the world),



not really, the threat of force is enough. Don't you think Syria is seriously reconsidering their stance? If the countries that currently support terrorism thought that the US is going to crush them unless they give up the terrorists, would they keep supporting them? Probably not.
Quote:

there are certain countries where the government doesn't have a very firm control over the populace except in certain areas.



so, we push the terrorist to these areas, don't you see how this would be a big help? state-sponsered terrorism is the worst kind, with the entire world against terrorists, they would have to run and hide somewhere, and while there running and hiding, they're not attacking. also, they're not going to be doing much recruiting if they have to hide.
Quote:

Terrorism will thrive as long as we continue give the terrorists a reason to attack us.



true, there will always be terrorism, because they can come up with whatever reason they want to attack. But state-sponsered terrorism can be stopped.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblesilversoul7
Chill the FuckOut!
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/10/02
Posts: 27,301
Loc: mndfreeze's puppet army
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: Evolving]
    #1467436 - 04/17/03 03:50 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Quote:

Terrorism will thrive as long as we continue give the terrorists a reason to attack us.



Do you mean, bring home U.S. troops from the approx 130 or 140 countires they're stationed in BESIDES THE U.S.?

Do you mean, stop giving money to foreign governments so their people won't perceive the U.S. as funding their oppressors?

Do you mean, stop using the U.S. military to make sure foreign countries are 'friendly' to U.S. business operations outside of the U.S. borders and not in international waters?

Do you mean, stop having the U.S. government fund foreign military operations in the name of combating 'the war on drugs?'

Do you mean stop having the U.S. government stop subsidizing U.S.business operations to promote them overseas?



Yes to all of those things you mentioned.


--------------------


"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleEvolving
Resident Cynic

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: silversoul7]
    #1467443 - 04/17/03 03:53 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

Kewl, then we're in agreement. :cool:


--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.'  Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence.  Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains.  Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineflow
outlaw immortal
Registered: 11/20/02
Posts: 496
Last seen: 2 years, 8 months
Re: Why the Anti-War Movement Was Right [Re: Evolving]
    #1467455 - 04/17/03 03:57 PM (14 years, 5 months ago)

so, isolationism then? i'll admit, if we tottaly cut ourselves off from the rest of the world, we would be much less likely to be the targets of terrorists, but can we really just say fuck you to the rest of the world?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Where is the anti-war movement?
( 1 2 3 all )
exclusive58 3,136 48 06/28/06 02:43 PM
by Phred
* Why The Anti-War Movement Was Right
( 1 2 all )
jimsuzo 1,449 20 04/23/03 06:14 PM
by Xlea321
* anti war Lenore 899 6 10/16/01 05:13 AM
by MokshaMan
* Pigs Attack California Anti-War Protesters
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Learyfan 3,289 71 04/09/03 05:22 AM
by Paid
* Carving up 10 anti-war arguments
( 1 2 3 all )
Anonymous 2,554 42 04/09/03 01:26 PM
by friartuck
* February 15 Anti-War Demonstrations....
( 1 2 all )
Angry Mycologist 3,258 33 02/16/03 04:36 PM
by Angry Mycologist
* Why The Anti-War Movement AND The Pope Were Right
( 1 2 all )
jimsuzo 1,605 31 04/25/03 07:00 PM
by wingnutx
* The War on Terror Is Not a Crime
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Luddite 3,998 67 04/30/08 02:45 AM
by johnm214

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
1,747 topic views. 1 members, 0 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Vaposhop
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.003 seconds on 18 queries.