Diploid said: Something you have likely never studied...yet profess to know all about...
I don't think anyone here claims to know all about Scientology, but it's not necessary to study something in depth to glean what it's about.
I've never immersed myself in communism, but I don't have to do that to know that it's a dead social system I want nothing to do with.
And I never met Hubbard or Stalin either, but I still have a pretty good idea what they were all about.
Also, there's plenty of evidence from former Scientologists (who ARE experts on the church) who had the presence of mind to extract themselves from that cult for me to make a well-informed judgment on the Church and its practices.
I'm not talking about the collection of individuals known as the CHURCH of Scientology (or CoS). I am talking about the SUBJECT of Scientology...which is contained in the books and recorded lectures of LRH. 40+ million words worth.
Would you take a college class on a subject when the professor had never opened 1 book on the subject...but instead was giving a class based on info from what people said about what people said about the subject?
Also, how does being a "former member" of a *group* qualify someone as an expert on a *subject*? I'd really like to know. I always thought being an expert on a subject required study of theory and practical application...not just hanging around other group members.
"Yeah, I hung out with a few physicists once....and now I'm an expert on physics..."
Quote: There are court judgments against the church that are public records exposing their crimes and their lies.
Yep, you're right there have been judgments against the Church of Scientology.
Also important to consider is the FACT that the American Legal system is ALWAYS in search of the truth. Right?
And when you say "their crimes", are you referring to every single Scientologist? Or is that just a generality?
Once again, I am not talking about the CHURCH of Scientology....but instead the SUBJECT of Scientology. Two totally distinct and separate entities.
Quote: There are people who have been chased and harassed and frightened by aggressive church members when they spoke out against the church. The church even has a formal name for this ritual intimidation practice: Fair Game.
Did you know that ANYONE with an internet connection can edit wikipedia? Did you also know that ANYONE, with the proper materials can create a website and publish ANYTHING they desire to publish?
Quote: Hubbard wrote the following about Fair Game:
The homes, property, places and abodes of persons who have been active in attempting to: suppress Scientology or Scientologists are all beyond any protection of Scientology Ethics, unless absolved by later Ethics or an amnesty ... this Policy Letter extends to suppressive non-Scientology wives and husbands and parents, or other family members or hostile groups or even close friends. Fair game may be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.
Meaning that for simply speaking out out against the church, the church can follow and scare the shit out of, and even INJURE my mother, sister, friends, and anyone else who knows me in an effort to force me to stop speaking the truth as I know it. That's fucked up.
That's an incorrect interpretation of Fair Game. Speaking out against something isn't trying to suppress it.
But tell me, if someone was trying to destroy you and your family, would you try to destroy them first or would you just get walked on?
Quote: In this regard, they are equivalent to the Taliban who also hurt people who disagree with their religion.
More "theys"? Just who are you talking about when you say "THEY"
Interestingly, *one* of the characteristics of a Suppressive Person, is the use of generalities...
If you ever wondered if there are evil people on this planet, there are...and there are also characteristics that you can identify an Suppressive Person (SP) by.
http://faq.scientology.org/page39.htm
An SP has the majority of those characteristics.
Quote: I don't have to know any more about the church beyond that ^^^ formal policy to know that it's a festering cesspool of superstition and aggression and I want nothing to do with it.
Once again, I'm not talking about the CHURCH of Scientology but the SUBJECT of Scientology. 2 Totally separate and distinct entities.
Quote: And finally, if you don't like what someone here says about the church, stop reading. If you tell anyone to "shut their rooster-holster" again, I'll ban you so you can think about this:
The individual in question shut himself up because there was nothing more to say? Correct?
That same individual who I suggested shut her "rooster holster" initiated the exchange by sending derogatory private messages. I instructed this person not to contact me anymore when I promptly received 2 more derogatory private messages.
Once again I am talking about the SUBJECT of Scientology....not the CHURCH of Scientology.
Quote: You don't start threads here then tell people who disagree with you to shut up. That's what the mumbo jumbo forum is for and Fair Game won't work here.
According to the data you C&Pd from Wiki, Fair Game has to do with injuring people and property, suing, tricking, lying to and destroying...Right?
I am just posting words on an internet message board. How is that anywhere near Fair Game?
Quote: I'll move this thread to mumbo jumbo if you like. Just ask. Otherwise it can stay here open to debate.
...You 'da Mod.
-------------------- "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." ― Plato
"I communicate, therefore I am" - I
"Nature is ancient, but surprises us all." - Björk
|