I assume you are speaking of most modern money which is in fact NOT backed by any amount of precious metal. It is only worth something because you know it is worth something to someone else who in tern will take it because it is worth something to someone else. It really is all in your head but its more of a convenience than anything. Think of it as a way to stockpile your efforts. It makes it easier to buy the things you want and makes it more efficient as well so you can get more for your effort of working. Not to mention it allows you to specialize in one thing, which lets you make things more efficiently and improve upon them because that is all you do. I could go on and on about the benefits of currency but that'd be for another time.
You mentioned "The US government speaks of inflation as some mysterious economic force out of her control, but point-of-fact: the ONLY cause of inflation is the government printing more money than is backed by any form of real wealth thus devaluing every citizens' holdings dramatically." which is not true at all. The only cause of inflation is NOT the government printing more money than is backed by real wealth (its not backed by anything physical anyway and there is no one cause of inflation). Inflation is actually a very very good thing (to a degree). No inflation causes a stagnant economy where effectively no money is changing hands and extremely high inflation is obviously bad as well because the prices of things are way out of peoples league. The economics of the US and other large industrial nations is not as simple as to say that the government printing money is bad. You also lump all inflation into the same category. The housing market's inflation has nothing to do with the current value of the US$(unless you where buying real estate in a different country and exchanging your currency for theirs but you're not and thats even more complicated). When a single internal market (such as housing) either sky rockets or plummets that is the effect, not the cause of a problem. It is actually the problem fixing itself. You said housing prices have gone up 10 fold in the last few decades, yet they are currently going way way down (hence the reason a lot of people are losing their newly purchased homes). You're right in that the housing market was over inflated but the government had nothing to do with that. In the most simplified way of looking at it, its simply people over valuing something and then realizing "oh wait its not really worth that much"(in the current case with housing its a little different than that but again that is beyond the scope of this post). It really is nothing more than supply and demand, when there isn't much of something (ie houses can't be built as fast as people want them) and a lot of people want them then the prices go up, then when that reverses (either more housing companies building houses or less people wanting to take the risk of buying a new home) the prices drop until that balance is found again. Of course the balance is never truly found because things are always changing this is why when economists talk about the cause and effect of something they'll say "Ceteris Paribus" which in latin means "all else equal".
So now onto why goverments hate it when you print fake money. They hate it because they don't just willy nilly print out money. Bob doesn't wake up one morning and say "Hey maybe we should print off some more $100's". You'd also have to question who gets this new money? If you said the government you'd only be half right (a lot of it goes to replace aging bills they receive from banks) but even the government isn't stupid and realizes that if they go around spending all this new money and just print out more whenever they need then they will seriously devalue their money and in turn have to print out more and more until it costs more to print out money than they get out of printing it (in which case most countries who screw up this badly have just made larger bills). The amount of money the government adds into circulation each year is very very VERY carefully calculated. The people who are in charge of interest rates and such are in a position that they can't be placed in twice (it might actually be a life time position I forget) so they don't have to worry about "public backlash" and play politics because what they do takes decades to even take effect and they shouldn't be worried about what people think about them now. They nudge and bump the economy, not steer it. So when someone goes through and prints out some fake $20's not only do they screw with how much money was added to circulation but if/when people realize fake money is going around they lose trust in the money so money is devalued and if left unchecked money will be worthless which is the real problem. Because of this large retailers (Walmart, Target ect) who accidentally take fake money actually turn it in and get real money in exchange for documenting where this money came from.
Economics really is very complicated and interwoven with a lot of different things. There is no one cause of anything and the government has just as much to lose than you do for screwing up the economy. This post by no means is anywhere close to complete to back up a lot of my own reasoning otherwise I'd be pages and pages and pages. You have the internet at your fingertips with a huge variety of sources, so don't take my word for any of this. The beauty of being human is you are smart enough to question information presented to you.
Edited by pasteface (05/06/07 12:31 PM)
|