Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 618 | 619 | 620 | 621 | 622 | 623 | 624 | 625 | 626 | 627 | 628 | 629 | 630 | 631 | 632 | 633 | 634 | 635 | 636 | 637 | 638 | | Last >
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: koods] * 1
    #27065724 -

Trump’s lawyer is retweeting calls for republicans to skip the senate run-offs. They are eating themselves.



--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #27065728 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Seriously_trippin said:
...everyone reading this knows fox news was 110% on board the Trump train...


Fox was definitely not 110% Trump.  There were constant criticisms of Trump from people like Chris Wallace, Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly, etc.

I realize, Fox also has dedicated Trump supporters, unlike other mainstream sources.


All news sources should be critical of the president....


--------------------


Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean] * 1
    #27065949 -

Being critical of a president is not synonymous with denouncing said president.

Fal your dishonesty knows no bounds.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: natedawgnow]
    #27065983 -

Trump tries to sue in wisconsin again. With already shot down claims


--------------------
Everything you need in one spot.

My Q&A thread. Ask me questions here rather than in Private Message
Bod's chat thread

5g a day keeps the 5g away

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: bodhisatta]
    #27065984 -

He has to justify all the donations his followers are tossing at him. It's likely a drop in the bucket, money well spent.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: christopera]
    #27065988 -

The lawsuit calls the election one of the closest in history. I thought he won by huge massive margins lol


--------------------
Everything you need in one spot.

My Q&A thread. Ask me questions here rather than in Private Message
Bod's chat thread

5g a day keeps the 5g away

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: natedawgnow]
    #27066043 -

natedawgnow said:
Being critical of a president is not synonymous with denouncing said president.

Fal your dishonesty knows no bounds.


Can you please quote where I said being critical of a president is synonymous with denouncing a president?  Or do you gotta go fishing again?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Edited by Falcon91Wolvrn03 (12/01/20 10:32 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 5
    #27066067 -

Saying that fox news is mainstream, and thus doesnt support trump, because chris wallace et al.
criticized him, is highly dishonest and if you cant see that then whatever. Everybody else can


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: natedawgnow] * 3
    #27066116 -

Wonder if fal still pays a bunch of attention to +1s lol


--------------------
Everything you need in one spot.

My Q&A thread. Ask me questions here rather than in Private Message
Bod's chat thread

5g a day keeps the 5g away

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: natedawgnow]
    #27066125 -

natedawgnow said:
Being critical of a president is not synonymous with denouncing said president.

Fal your dishonesty knows no bounds.


Falcon thinks not lying on behalf of the president is tantamount to denouncing.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean] * 5
    #27066224 -

Sulfurshelfsean said:
All news sources should be critical of the president...


Since when is criticizing or praising politicians part of reporting the news? Or have we totally abandoned the idea of reporting what is happening without adding opinion? Have we degraded to such a low level we need the news to tell us how we should think about things?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: RJ Tubs 202]
    #27066290 -

Rudy is looking for a pardon.

I think he’s officially lost it. Hilarious in this moment, totally sad over all.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: koods] * 1
    #27066499 -

koods said:
Falcon thinks not lying on behalf of the president is tantamount to denouncing.


Please stop with the constant make believe.  Thanks.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: christopera] * 1
    #27066514 -

christopera said:
Rudy is looking for a pardon.

I think he’s officially lost it. Hilarious in this moment, totally sad over all.


The entire discussion about the election has pretty much been:

Take a look at this evidence.
No.  It's been debunked (without explaining how it's been debunked).
Take a look at this evidence.
No.  It's a conspiracy theory (without explaining why it's a conspiracy theory).
Take a look at this evidence.
Big fat poo poo head!

Does anyone actually care to discuss the evidence, or will it continue to be brushed aside with insults (directing this question to everyone, not just you christopera)?  :shrug:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #27066521 -

There is no evidence there's conspiracy theories. If there was evidence there wouldn't be 35+ cases tossed out at the federal level


--------------------
Everything you need in one spot.

My Q&A thread. Ask me questions here rather than in Private Message
Bod's chat thread

5g a day keeps the 5g away

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: feevers] * 2
    #27066537 -

feevers said:



Sometimes a meme really hits the nail on the head.

This meme does its job better than a 15min explanation of the ironic nature of
a socioeconomically disadvantaged individual supporting trump or any candidate who runs on the success of the 1%

Bravo to the creator


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: bodhisatta] * 1
    #27066562 -

bodhisatta said:
There is no evidence there's conspiracy theories. If there was evidence there wouldn't be 35+ cases tossed out at the federal level


In other words "I don't want to talk about the evidence".

I'm not saying whether the evidence is true or not, I'm saying I'm amazed at how hard people are trying to avoid any discussion about it.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 5
    #27066585 -

The outcomes of the cases are the evidence he's presenting. One very plausible explanation for those outcomes is that the evidence brought forward in those cases sucked. If the evidence did not suck, then the outcomes of the cases must be accounted for in some other way.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #27066619 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
bodhisatta said:
There is no evidence there's conspiracy theories. If there was evidence there wouldn't be 35+ cases tossed out at the federal level


In other words "I don't want to talk about the evidence".

I'm not saying whether the evidence is true or not, I'm saying I'm amazed at how hard people are trying to avoid any discussion about it.


So post better evidence than the evidence trump and rudy had because their lack of evidence got slaughtered. If you have something I'll gladly check it out.

There's nothing to talk about. Federal judges trump appointed dismissed his lawsuits and said because there was no evidence.


--------------------
Everything you need in one spot.

My Q&A thread. Ask me questions here rather than in Private Message
Bod's chat thread

5g a day keeps the 5g away

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #27066632 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
I'm not saying whether the evidence is true or not, I'm saying I'm amazed at how hard people are trying to avoid any discussion about it.


Because this is the politics subforum, not the conspiracy subforum.

Yes or no question FW; do you believe that election fraud is the reason Trump lost?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 618 | 619 | 620 | 621 | 622 | 623 | 624 | 625 | 626 | 627 | 628 | 629 | 630 | 631 | 632 | 633 | 634 | 635 | 636 | 637 | 638 | | Last >

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The Trump Phenomenon
( 1 2 3 4 ... 50 51 )		 Count of Sabugosa 41,977 1,006 01/27/16 02:53 PM
by zappaisgod
* Trump
( 1 2 3 4 ... 131 132 )		 DividedQuantumM 80,071 2,635 01/19/21 07:19 AM
by STPLSD25
* Saddam's 500-ton Uranium Stockpile Los_Pepes 540 3 11/08/05 04:24 PM
by Rono
* Iran enriches uranium Basilides 1,848 15 04/12/06 05:22 PM
by Asante
* "Iran begins uranium enrichment at new underground site"
( 1 2 all )		 404 1,309 33 01/09/12 06:19 PM
by Shins
* UN Officials Find Evidence of Iran's Secret Uranium Enrichment Plant
( 1 2 all )		 DiploidM 2,379 30 04/11/06 12:32 PM
by Phred
* Iran to process fresh batch of uranium lonestar2004 728 5 11/02/05 05:32 PM
by lonestar2004
* Oh my god! Depleted Uranium!!!
( 1 2 all )		 flow 1,485 30 03/27/03 06:39 PM
by zeronio

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
499,379 topic views. 3 members, 1 guests and 36 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.016 seconds on 16 queries.