Quote:

I had no objection to their disagreement with my views of what this Biden evidence shows: as a last-ditch attempt to avoid being censored, I encouraged them to air their disagreements with me by writing their own articles that critique my perspectives and letting readers decide who is right, the way any confident and healthy media outlet would. But modern media outlets do not air dissent; they quash it. So censorship of my article, rather than engagement with it, was the path these Biden-supporting editors chose.

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Oh shit.  Glenn Greenwald just resigned from the Intercept because they censored an article of his that was critical of Joe Biden.

Quote:

I had no objection to their disagreement with my views of what this Biden evidence shows: as a last-ditch attempt to avoid being censored, I encouraged them to air their disagreements with me by writing their own articles that critique my perspectives and letting readers decide who is right, the way any confident and healthy media outlet would. But modern media outlets do not air dissent; they quash it. So censorship of my article, rather than engagement with it, was the path these Biden-supporting editors chose.

---

---

Enlil said:

Good riddance.  That piece he wrote was pure babble.

---

Brian Jones said:

The Intercept said Greenwald resigned because they insisted he provide evidence of his claims against Biden before they would release his story. Greenwald viewed this as censorship, but isn't that how journalism is supposed to work?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Brian Jones said:

The Intercept said Greenwald resigned because they insisted he provide evidence of his claims against Biden before they would release his story. Greenwald viewed this as censorship, but isn't that how journalism is supposed to work?

---

Have you heard about the Hunter Biden emails yet?  Or has that been suppressed?  We're FAR beyond questioning if they're real or not.

---

Quote:

Thus far, no proof has been offered by Bubolinski that Biden ever consummated his participation in any of those discussed deals. The Wall Street Journal says that it found no corporate records reflecting that a deal was finalized and that "text messages and emails related to the venture that were provided to the Journal by Mr. Bobulinski, mainly from the spring and summer of 2017, don’t show either Hunter Biden or James Biden discussing a role for Joe Biden in the venture."

But nobody claimed that any such deals had been consummated -- so the conclusion that one had not been does not negate the story. Moreover, some texts and emails whose authenticity has not been disputed state that Hunter was adamant that any discussions about the involvement of the Vice President be held only verbally and never put in writing.

---

Enlil said:

1. We don't know if they're authentic
2. If they are authentic, we don't know if they're true
3. If they are true, we don't know if Joe Biden had any knowledge of any of it
4. If Joe Biden did have knowledge, we have no evidence of any criminal conduct.

So, what's the story?  A whole lot of "IFs" that, even if true, mean absolutely nothing.  How is this news?

---

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Enlil said:

1. We don't know if they're authentic
2. If they are authentic, we don't know if they're true
3. If they are true, we don't know if Joe Biden had any knowledge of any of it
4. If Joe Biden did have knowledge, we have no evidence of any criminal conduct.

So, what's the story?  A whole lot of "IFs" that, even if true, mean absolutely nothing.  How is this news?

---

Nor did we know if Trump was colluding with Russia.  But a massive 3+ year investigation was conducted, which I supported.

---

Brian Jones said:

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:

Oh shit.  Glenn Greenwald just resigned from the Intercept because they censored an article of his that was critical of Joe Biden.

Quote:

I had no objection to their disagreement with my views of what this Biden evidence shows: as a last-ditch attempt to avoid being censored, I encouraged them to air their disagreements with me by writing their own articles that critique my perspectives and letting readers decide who is right, the way any confident and healthy media outlet would. But modern media outlets do not air dissent; they quash it. So censorship of my article, rather than engagement with it, was the path these Biden-supporting editors chose.

---

---

The Intercept said Greenwald resigned because they insisted he provide evidence of his claims against Biden before they would release his story. Greenwald viewed this as censorship, but isn't that how journalism is supposed to work?

---

koods said:

Dude the DOJ spent two years investigating Russia-gate because there was probable cause to do so.

---

koods said:

How much of the MSM reporting was wrong? I’m not talking about speculation about what the reporting means, I’m talking about the factual accuracy of the reports.

---

koods said:

Remember that Russia hacked the DNC and then those hacked emails were then released by Wikileaks in an effort to clearly harm the Clinton campaign.

---