Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 404 | 405 | 406 | 407 | 408 | 409 | 410 | 411 | 412 | 413 | 414 | 415 | 416 | 417 | 418 | 419 | 420 | 421 | 422 | 423 | 424 | | Last >
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #26840904 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Do you have a better interpretation of what Trump meant than someone who talked to him about it does?


Uh the obvious one. That it was a face value statement

Why do I need to invent some interpretation other than the obvious one?
If trump meant something else he should have said it. If he's such a genius
he should have no issue coming up with the correct words.

He has the best words after all


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: natedawgnow]
    #26840906 -

I watched the video again. The given interpretation makes zero sense.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: The Ecstatic] * 1
    #26840908 -

The Ecstatic said:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
It is a neutral statement.  People say "I wish (so and so) well" about people they don't care for all the time.


Lmao come onnnnnnnn


Google it.  It's priceless how many articles were written about just that BEFORE Trump said it.

Are you catching TDS?  :smirk:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: natedawgnow]
    #26840913 -

natedawgnow said:
You're about to take koods champion belt..


Some people here see how it makes sense, others don't.  Just because you can't see it doesn't mean anyone's make believing.

Trump's word beats your imagination as far as I'm concerned.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #26840916 -

Lol,  trumps word? You have to be trolling.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26840924 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
The Ecstatic said:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
It is a neutral statement.  People say "I wish (so and so) well" about people they don't care for all the time.


Lmao come onnnnnnnn


Google it.  It's priceless how many articles were written about just that BEFORE Trump said it.

Are you catching TDS?  :smirk:


Good lord. Donald Trump has never wished his enemies well. He calls them degrading names and trolls them on twitter.

You’re really wearing out this TDS thing. Youre becoming a parody of yourself.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: koods] * 1
    #26840934 -

:facepalm:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #26840945 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
natedawgnow said:
You're about to take koods champion belt..


Some people here see how it makes sense, others don't.  Just because you can't see it doesn't mean anyone's make believing.

Trump's word beats your imagination as far as I'm concerned.


But it wasn't trumps word. It was alleged that it was his word by his press secretary. Is she also his decoder?

You have officially lost it in a fairy tale land you've created for yourself.

I truly respected your opinion all the way up to the guigino deal, even through
your russia hoax narrative and the beginning of your transition to trump defense.

I am far from having TDS, I've even publicly supported multiple decisions of trumps,
but you cant even take one criticism of him without screaming it in every post.

You're a lost cause though and I'm pretty sure your opinion is meaningless to
a substantial portion of this board that used to take you seriously. Sucks.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: natedawgnow] * 1
    #26840962 -

:facepalm:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil]
    #26841015 -

Enlil said:
Lol,  trumps word? You have to be trolling.


So you're saying we shouldn't have taken Trump's word when he wished her well?  Two can play at your silly game.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: natedawgnow] * 1
    #26841047 -

natedawgnow said:
But it wasn't trumps word. It was alleged that it was his word by his press secretary. Is she also his decoder?


Are you saying his press secretary was lying about the conversation she had with Trump?  I'll make a signature bet that Trump doesn't come out and correct her.

natedawgnow said:
You have officially lost it in a fairy tale land you've created for yourself.


What's the fairy tale?  I'm in 'fairy tale land' because I take Trump's press secretary's word over your imagination?  Or what exactly?

natedawgnow said:
I am far from having TDS, I've even publicly supported multiple decisions of trumps,
but you cant even take one criticism of him without screaming it in every post.


I hate Trump as well, and I've listed plenty of bad things about him.  But I'm not getting on the make believe train with you.  You can make believe what Trump intended, or we can let Trump's press secretary tell us what he told her.  Up to you.

natedawgnow said:
You're a lost cause though and I'm pretty sure your opinion is meaningless to
a substantial portion of this board that used to take you seriously. Sucks.


Some people that get called out for make believe do hate my guts.  Others stop make believing.  :shrug:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26841057 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Enlil said:
Lol,  trumps word? You have to be trolling.


So you're saying we shouldn't have taken Trump's word when he wished her well?  Two can play at your silly game.


:facepalm: ridiculous argument.  I do wonder if your account was hacked, perhaps  by Russian trolls.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil]
    #26841080 -

Enlil said:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Enlil said:
Lol,  trumps word? You have to be trolling.


So you're saying we shouldn't have taken Trump's word when he wished her well?  Two can play at your silly game.


:facepalm: ridiculous argument.  I do wonder if your account was hacked, perhaps  by Russian trolls.


I agree that Trump isn't always honest, like most politicians.

But believing your own make believe over Trump's words is pretty ridiculous as well.

I've shown evidence that people wish their enemies well ALL THE TIME.

You'll have to better than trying to shame me into silence with Russophobic claims, and return to you roots of logical arguments from days of old. :shrug:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26841091 -

He didn't just wish her  well.  Watch the video again. He said:

Quote:
I don't know. I haven't really been following it too much. I just wish her well, frankly. I've met her numerous times over the years, especially since I lived in Palm Beach. I guess they lived in Palm Beach. But I wish her well. Whatever it is.


He didn't say anything about her being an enemy.  In fact he says he met her numerous times between wishing her well twice.  All the while, he is the boss of hundreds of people who have worked, and continue to work, to put this woman in jail.  You don't see the hypocrisy of this?  You don't see how undermining that is for the prosecutor?

Imagine if the Mayor of Los Angeles wished Manson well as he awaited trial.  That's the equivalent of what we're seeing here.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil]
    #26841139 -

He explained himself to his press secretary, and you refuse to believe what he told her.  That's fine, no one is forcing you to believe it.

Trump not wishing her dead in a jail cell actually supports your point that he may have liked her.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26841157 -

All of you are telling me "it should be obvious what Trump's intentions were" even if the evidence (what Trump says) is the opposite.  Yet you criticize Vahn (as have I) for using the same 'self evident' logic.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Edited by Falcon91Wolvrn03 (07/23/20 05:49 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #26841190 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
He explained himself to his press secretary, and you refuse to believe what he told her.  That's fine, no one is forcing you to believe it.

Trump not wishing her dead in a jail cell actually supports your point that he may have liked her.


For someone who claims to be an expert at ferreting out propaganda and fake news, you do fall for it quite easily.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Enlil] * 1
    #26841193 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
All of you are telling me "it should be obvious what Trump's intentions were" even if the evidence (what Trump says) is the opposite.  Yet you criticize Vahn (as have I) for using the same 'self evident' logic.


LMFAO! We were thinking the same thing.

Give us evidence of Trump's intentions or you're a bunch of bullshit hypocrites.

This is exactly what I mean. None of you are even self-aware enough to realize you're guilty of the same things you accuse other of being insufferable trolls for doing.

EDIT: I actually don't care, I'm happy to discuss theory. But you're SOOOOOOO certain without evidence. :rolleyes: (Mr lawyer who works in a court of law ought to know this isn't enough to convict someone of being an accomplice or a supporter.)


--------------------

Edited by Vahn421 (07/23/20 06:00 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Vahn421]
    #26841222 -

His words speak for themselves


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: TRUMP 2020 [Re: Vahn421]
    #26841234 -

Quote:
Give us evidence of Trump's intentions or you're a bunch of bullshit hypocrites.


 
  It was an incredibly stupid thing to say . Best case your defending something really stupid.
Worst case your defending someone who was involved in her sex trafficking . There’s no positive spin for this crazy horseshit .


--------------------


Edited by Psilynut2 (07/23/20 06:24 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 404 | 405 | 406 | 407 | 408 | 409 | 410 | 411 | 412 | 413 | 414 | 415 | 416 | 417 | 418 | 419 | 420 | 421 | 422 | 423 | 424 | | Last >

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* US States Renamed For Countries With Similar GDPs lonestar2004 408 1 06/22/07 08:22 PM
by zappaisgod
* 2020 VISION What will Canada look like in 15 years?
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 lonestar2004 10,835 65 12/12/19 01:38 PM
by JohnRainy
* 2020 VISION What will America look like in 15 years? trendalM 2,261 15 01/03/20 01:55 AM
by Loaded Shaman
* China could build a modern military by 2020
( 1 2 all )		 Green_T 3,243 23 08/28/11 08:48 PM
by Madtowntripper
* Pre-emptive war to its logical extreme
( 1 2 3 all )		 looner2 3,724 48 04/13/05 12:48 PM
by SWEDEN
* Donald Trump for President
( 1 2 all )		 mm. 3,991 23 03/04/16 02:51 PM
by 2500 ug. Club
* Donald Trump: Mideast Explosion Could Destroy OPEC lonestar2004 1,349 14 02/01/11 03:17 PM
by zappaisgod
* Do you let logic or emotion guide your political and philosophical beliefs? RandalFlagg 553 11 12/30/05 12:00 PM
by Gijith

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
484,217 topic views. 6 members, 64 guests and 42 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.045 seconds spending 0.016 seconds on 18 queries.