XUL said:

qman said:

The Ecstatic said:

qman is a cuck to the ruling class. Maybe he enjoys being a sub idk, I don’t kink shame.

---

Says the guy who's pro-immigration and pro-globalism. 

---

This.

Leftists name call. Meanwhile they have their own issues that are destroying the country.

Just remember this.

Whatever happens, the leftists will attack you personally.

Don't worry though!

They allow you to see how normally polite you are.

The left are Adult name callers who want to save the world from racism, global warming, capitalism, and the patriarchy.

Strange, they can't utter a sentence without attacking someone personally.

I can't imagine their ideas and rhetoric will make it far in the US or the world.

---

DontFearThePeepr said:

i would tell them their religions are wrong and they should try some drugs lol

---

ballsalsa said:

ballsalsa said:

What you are describing is called a confederacy and we tried it already.  It failed miserably because the states didn't want to pay taxes.  What has changed in the intervening couple hundred years to make this model more viable?

Also, why do you hate the constitution?

---

XUL said:

Then you should condemn medical marijuana and sanctuary cities, else you are a hypocrite in my eyes.

---

There is a disconnect here between the 2 questions I asked you and your response to them.
Maybe you can clarify for me how we got from here to there?

---

qman said:

Most on the left are too stupid to understand and realize they're advocates for The Elites social and economic agendas.

---

XUL said:

It doesn't.

It's just a fact for fun.

---

XUL said:

It doesn't.

It's just a fact for fun.

---

XUL said:

Do you think I am the far right KKK?

Literally, do you?

---

qman said:

DontFearThePeepr said:

this ideology also isn't practical since diff states have diff resources, and same applies for diff countries. this is why anti-globalism confuses me, we obvs have to trade but since some people don't like these necessary arrangements and call them a ripoff everyone should just call the whole thing off?

---

"anti-globalism"

This isn't about not trading, it's about not having a potential world central government.  It's also about not being able to control one's immigration policies.

The current issue with US trade is the massive trade deficit. This deficit exists because other countries use tariffs and currency manipulations to benefit themselves at the US workers expense. 

Trump and his supporters want a balance of trade, not no trade at all.  The imbalance of trade is responsible for the massive wealth inequality and stagnant wages in the US. 

I can't understand why any US worker would be pro-globalism. Immigration and trade has destroyed the US middle-class.

---

Kryptos said:

XUL said:

Do you think I am the far right KKK?

Literally, do you?

---

Two years ago? Nah. Today? Hell yeah. I could see you goose-stepping with your arm out facing donald.

The idea that government exists only to maintain a military and nothing else is becoming a much more common refrain among conservatives. A little bit ago, it was the fringe crazy right.

Then again, Republicans started the EPA fifty years ago, today they call it fake news. There's been a lot of cultural and social regression and devolution on the right wing lately.

qman said:

DontFearThePeepr said:

this ideology also isn't practical since diff states have diff resources, and same applies for diff countries. this is why anti-globalism confuses me, we obvs have to trade but since some people don't like these necessary arrangements and call them a ripoff everyone should just call the whole thing off?

---

"anti-globalism"

This isn't about not trading, it's about not having a potential world central government.  It's also about not being able to control one's immigration policies.

The current issue with US trade is the massive trade deficit. This deficit exists because other countries use tariffs and currency manipulations to benefit themselves at the US workers expense. 

Trump and his supporters want a balance of trade, not no trade at all.  The imbalance of trade is responsible for the massive wealth inequality and stagnant wages in the US. 

I can't understand why any US worker would be pro-globalism. Immigration and trade has destroyed the US middle-class.

---

So, what's so bad about a central world government? You seem to like the idea of state government, what makes a world government inherently bad, while a state government is good?

Of course other countries use currency manipulation and tariffs. So do we. The USD is the reserve currency of the world, and until recently (thanks, donald!), all oil transactions happened in USD. Which means that the purchasing country would have to buy USD (giving us a cut), and the selling country had to then sell USD (giving us a cut again). We have tariffs on virtually everywhere in the world. Why do you think Ford and Chevy pickups even exist today? 25% tariff on all light truck imports. This is also, coincidentally, why ford and chevy pickups in the US cost ~20% more than everywhere else.

You don't think spending 5-10% of their income on medical insurance while wages remained stagnant due to the destruction of Unions by granddaddy Reagan had anything to do with the middle class falling apart? A lot of those jobs are service jobs, too. So tariffs won't actually affect them in any way.

Productivity has gone up. Average income has gone up. The 1% are making 4x as much as they were making ~40 years ago. It's just that median income has stayed the same. Everyone else has about the same purchasing power as they did in Reagan's time. But as supply side Jesus says: Average income is going up, so the economy is doing GREAT! MAGA! Except for when it isn't, because it's sometimes politically inconvenient.

---

qman said:

The Ecstatic said:

qman is a cuck to the ruling class. Maybe he enjoys being a sub idk, I don’t kink shame.

---

Says the guy who's pro-immigration and pro-globalism. 

---

The Ecstatic said:

qman said:

The Ecstatic said:

qman is a cuck to the ruling class. Maybe he enjoys being a sub idk, I don’t kink shame.

---

Says the guy who's pro-immigration and pro-globalism. 

---

Depends on which definition of globalism we’re using today. You realize the ruling class already doesn’t abide by borders? Borders only restrict labor. If the ruling class didn’t have us all sequestered in different nations with different labor laws and different wage systems and different standards of living, globalism would be a good thing.

You only think nationalism is good because you’re the house n*gger.  While the rest of the world slaves away in the fields, you’re baking pies and making tea. You lucked out and got the best available position for a working class human: you were born inside the imperial center, whose workers get the highest standard of living among all working classes. If you were born in Haiti something tells me you wouldn’t be so high and mighty about nationalism. Yet you still refuse to accept that where and when you happened to be born has any effect on your ideology. Sad.

---

split_by_nine said:

what part of your standard of living will be lowered in conjunction with an increase of immigration to the usa? serious question qman

---