DontFearThePeepr said:

XUL said:

The Democrats usually do.

With slavery, marijuana, and sanctuary cities.

---

this actually didn't answer my question lol. well...unless maybe you were talking about from like a hundred years ago when there was a role reversal of party ideals

---

DontFearThePeepr said:

this ideology also isn't practical since diff states have diff resources, and same applies for diff countries. this is why anti-globalism confuses me, we obvs have to trade but since some people don't like these necessary arrangements and call them a ripoff everyone should just call the whole thing off?

---

XUL said:

I'm saying that poor states should look at great states and think about emulating their ideas.

---

qman said:

This isn't about not trading, it's about not having a potential world central government.  It's also about not being able to control one's immigration policies.

The current issue with US trade is the massive trade deficit. This deficit exists because other countries use tariffs and currency manipulations to benefit themselves at the US workers expense. 

Trump and his supporters want a balance of trade, not no trade at all.  The imbalance of trade is responsible for the massive wealth inequality and stagnant wages in the US.

I can't understand why any US worker would be pro-globalism. Immigration and trade has destroyed the US middle-class.

---

ballsalsa said:

What you are describing is called a confederacy and we tried it already.  It failed miserably because the states didn't want to pay taxes.  What has changed in the intervening couple hundred years to make this model more viable?

Also, why do you hate the constitution?

---

XUL said:

Then you should condemn medical marijuana and sanctuary cities, else you are a hypocrite in my eyes.

---

There is a disconnect here between the 2 questions I asked you and your response to them.
Maybe you can clarify for me how we got from here to there?

XUL said:

I don't want anything (other than safety from Invaders) from the government and I don't want to give the government much of my money. Paying for state maintenance is enough.

I want the government to get out of business of fixing social issues.

One thing I like from Trump is the repeal of the individual mandate. Also downsizing  government regulations and so forth.

---

The Ecstatic said:

qman is a cuck to the ruling class. Maybe he enjoys being a sub idk, I don’t kink shame.

---

Says the guy who's pro-immigration and pro-globalism. 

DontFearThePeepr said:

qman said:

This isn't about not trading, it's about not having a potential world central government.  It's also about not being able to control one's immigration policies.

The current issue with US trade is the massive trade deficit. This deficit exists because other countries use tariffs and currency manipulations to benefit themselves at the US workers expense. 

Trump and his supporters want a balance of trade, not no trade at all.  The imbalance of trade is responsible for the massive wealth inequality and stagnant wages in the US.

I can't understand why any US worker would be pro-globalism. Immigration and trade has destroyed the US middle-class.

---

how doesn't this relate more to the way business owners run their companies? the biggest companies' CEO's are making billions while they continue to stiff the working class on liveable wage. seems like it's more about them trying to keep a bigger slice of the pie while shifting blame and stoking hate at the same time.

tho this wouldn't apply as well to smaller businesses so i don't disagree with your point there. world trade relations are undoubtedly very complicated so for the most part we largely rely on having others explain it for us in a simplified way.

as far as a "one world government" goes, it would seem the only problem with the idea is that people running it would be expectedly corrupted, but i see this as more of an issue about people not being able to get on the same page about things and understanding how to see things from a more mutual perspective. if that were the case it should theoretically help to put everyone in better standing, regardless of where they rank in the current multi-faction society.

---

qman said:

The Ecstatic said:

qman is a cuck to the ruling class. Maybe he enjoys being a sub idk, I don’t kink shame.

---

Says the guy who's pro-immigration and pro-globalism. 

---