Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: chibiabos]
    #24921175 -

chibiabos said:
SirTripAlot said:
No, but catching a glimpse of old lady pancake titties may be an eye sore to some people.

As far as sexual harassment goes.....would it be for the better or worse? Undeniably, men are attracted  physically to things....even the above, those sick bastards.



And women just hate fit, shirtless dudes.



Honestly, so if tits flapping in the wind, is simply a women's right to show her body parts....is there a difference for genitals or should that be good to go?


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: SirTripAlot]
    #24921182 -

Most progressive women don't see boobies as a sex organ so no in their eyes genitalia are a different story.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: xzylocybin] * 1
    #24921189 -

And yet some people consider the asshole as one....others legs, the mouth, ect


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: xzylocybin]
    #24921207 -

xzylocybin said:
Most progressive women don't see boobies as a sex organ so no in their eyes genitalia are a different story.



Source? Or just another made up xzylocybism?


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods]
    #24921265 -

Because I have debated feminists on this topic several times and that is what they all have said, and I have seen them say it on videos too. I should have added "in my experience" but it seems like a pretty widespread belief among the third wave feminists and sjw's

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: xzylocybin]
    #24921273 -

And after a quick google search it appears that I am correct.
What reason do you have to disbelieve me other than you just don't like me?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: xzylocybin]
    #24921284 -

Because everything you have said today has been false.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: SirTripAlot]
    #24921290 -

SirTripAlot said:
chibiabos said:
SirTripAlot said:
No, but catching a glimpse of old lady pancake titties may be an eye sore to some people.

As far as sexual harassment goes.....would it be for the better or worse? Undeniably, men are attracted  physically to things....even the above, those sick bastards.



And women just hate fit, shirtless dudes.



Honestly, so if tits flapping in the wind, is simply a women's right to show her body parts....is there a difference for genitals or should that be good to go?



Ever seen a European family's beach pictures?

edit:  Actually, if you look for some on Google then you might set off the kiddie-porn alarm.

Edited by chibiabos (01/17/18 07:16 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods]
    #24921367 -

koods said:
Because everything you have said today has been false.



Oh ok, I will take that entirely at face value because I respect your intellect and opinion so much.

Edited by xzylocybin (01/17/18 07:34 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: xzylocybin]
    #24921386 -

Another one


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods]
    #24921405 -

You annoy me but that was kinda funny.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: Succubussasha]
    #24921667 -

Succubussasha said:
qman said:
Feminists think porn exploits women, yet what's more liberating than having sex on film and not being ashamed of it.



It's unfortunate that you don't know what feminism is.
I'm a feminist and a sex worker. 
Most feminist are sex positive feminists who support a women's decision to have or not have sex however they like (assuming it's consentual).
And I personally don't find being filmed liberating. What I find much more liberating is turning guys down for sex in the strip club.



As for the original topic.  Women shouldn't be arrested for a lack of clothing, that's ridiculous.



As far im concerned there is nothing liberating at all, about humiliating/degrading yourself for money. Women should be able to do whatever they want, but anyone willing to sell their own body for money is a disgusting person. It really shows to their lack of character and morals. Which is probably why most of them are junkies, because no normal, respectful and decent person would stoop to the lows of sex work.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: MagicMush123]
    #24921727 -

MagicMush123 said:
Succubussasha said:
qman said:
Feminists think porn exploits women, yet what's more liberating than having sex on film and not being ashamed of it.



It's unfortunate that you don't know what feminism is.
I'm a feminist and a sex worker. 
Most feminist are sex positive feminists who support a women's decision to have or not have sex however they like (assuming it's consentual).
And I personally don't find being filmed liberating. What I find much more liberating is turning guys down for sex in the strip club.



As for the original topic.  Women shouldn't be arrested for a lack of clothing, that's ridiculous.



As far im concerned there is nothing liberating at all, about humiliating/degrading yourself for money. Women should be able to do whatever they want, but anyone willing to sell their own body for money is a disgusting person. It really shows to their lack of character and morals. Which is probably why most of them are junkies, because no normal, respectful and decent person would stoop to the lows of sex work.



God has blessed us with the chance to proselytize.  Hooray!


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #24921730 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Icelander said:
Same state as Portland.:thumbup: Small town of around twenty two thousand.  Full of old hippies and fancy buddhists.  PUKE.



Ha, I'm in Portland right now on a business trip.  Less than 50% of the women here wear makeup.  Kind of interesting to know what women really look like.  :shrug:



Yeah I don't see much makeup around here. Only ugly women benefit from a lot of makeup.  I moved here almost 30 years ago because of all the fresh faced hippie chicks. So many beautiful women I couldn't believe it. And sexually  relaxed.


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Edited by Icelander (01/17/18 10:03 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: MagicMush123]
    #24923525 -

MagicMush123 said:
As far im concerned there is nothing liberating at all, about humiliating/degrading yourself for money. Women should be able to do whatever they want, but anyone willing to sell their own body for money is a disgusting person.



So actors, supermodels, porn starts, etc. are all disgusting people???  I don't get your point of view.

MagicMush123 said:
no normal, respectful and decent person would stoop to the lows of sex work.



What do you mean "stoop"?  Why is it "low"?  I'd much rather be a porn star than work my current job.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #24923531 -

I'd pay good money to see you naked. :nicesmile:


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #24923551 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
MagicMush123 said:
As far im concerned there is nothing liberating at all, about humiliating/degrading yourself for money. Women should be able to do whatever they want, but anyone willing to sell their own body for money is a disgusting person.



So actors, supermodels, porn starts, etc. are all disgusting people???  I don't get your point of view.



Women in makeup look like they're wearing makeup, to be honest.  I'd rather deal with blemishes and wrinkles in somebody's face than the smell of makeup too.  And pictures of porn stars and super models tend to be doctored to make them look flawless.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: Icelander]
    #24923553 -

Icelander said:
I moved here almost 30 years ago because of all the fresh faced hippie chicks. So many beautiful women I couldn't believe it. And sexually  relaxed.



I agree.

:freewilly:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #24923595 -

Sex work can be profitable when your John is a Donald.

130k for this one


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods]
    #24923609 -

Looks like a strong worker.  :shrug:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* feminists
( 1 2 3 all )
DoctorJ 4,371 45 05/04/06 11:16 PM
by blaze2
* "Bush is an idiot, but he was right about Saddam" EchoVortex 1,685 14 03/23/03 01:03 AM
by Xlea321
* Rise of the far-right in France and Europe
( 1 2 3 4 ... 710 711 )
circastes 303,776 14,200 02/23/25 01:10 PM
by Brian Jones
* The United States is NOT Capitalist...
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
trendalM 17,956 133 09/28/09 01:34 PM
by Phred
* Political Justice, the "right" to survive?
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 3,135 27 12/22/03 06:51 PM
by Crobih
* What are our rights? z@z.com 1,213 18 06/19/03 05:30 PM
by z@z.com
* rights, liberty, government... Anonymous 1,264 18 08/27/03 12:11 AM
by DeepDish2
* Know your rights Card. Have it on you! Anonymous 935 4 10/20/02 12:59 AM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
1,441 topic views. 4 members, 7 guests and 21 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.034 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 18 queries.