Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Original Sensible Seeds Feminized Cannabis Seeds   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: Succubussasha]
    #24917943 -

Succubussasha said:
Lol that makes sense because his post sure don't make any sense to me XD.



Read my link, it explains in great deal the history of feminism and pornography. Why doesn't that make any sense?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: Succubussasha]
    #24917958 -

this whole issue of what women are and are not allowed to wear just pisses me off. bunch of cranky old men deciding what can or cannot be worn, Doesn't matter if it is (not) going topless or wearing a hijab or a niqab or not wearing eighter. It should be a decision made by only the individual affected.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: MushiesAreVegan]
    #24918662 -

Succubussasha said:
qman said:
Feminists think porn exploits women, yet what's more liberating than having sex on film and not being ashamed of it.



It's unfortunate that you don't know what feminism is.
I'm a feminist and a sex worker. 
Most feminist are sex positive feminists who support a women's decision to have or not have sex however they like (assuming it's consentual).
And I personally don't find being filmed liberating. What I find much more liberating is turning guys down for sex in the strip club.



Hush woman.  The men are discussing what to do about your lack of shame of your natural anatomy.  Do not trouble us with your unbalanced female humours!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: qman]
    #24918680 -

qman said:
Succubussasha said:
Lol that makes sense because his post sure don't make any sense to me XD.



Read my link, it explains in great deal the history of feminism and pornography. Why doesn't that make any sense?



Feminists seem to have issues with the porn industry on account of the fact that it tends to exploit people in general.  Pornography isn't inherently evil, but there is a lot of bad shit that happens to young men and women as a result of dealing with people in that industry.  Doesn't happen to everybody, but there are predators and vulnerable people wrapped up in all of that shit along with everybody else.

Edited by chibiabos (01/16/18 06:12 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: chibiabos]
    #24918898 -

And predators are not limited to the porn industry

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: chibiabos] * 1
    #24918899 -

But by claiming feminists hate porn, he can say they're hypocrites if they want to walk in public topless. :cookiemonster:


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: sweeper54] * 1
    #24919494 -

LRG said:
Should I be surprised how inconsiderate people like this are?

This isn't Europe. People here are not accustomed to it and are allowed their objections. 

I've lived overseas and don't have an issue with it, but some people here do. Definitely not worthy of being a crime, but this is the sort of thing you do in the privacy of your home in America.

It's not liberating. It's provocative and attention seeking. They expect to be told to cover up, knowing people around them likely don't approve. These are the same type of women who complain about "manspreading" but whip their tits out for attention.



another snowflake defending the fragile Americans who would can't deal with human anatomy.

sweeper54 said:
Quote:
Supporters of the bill warned that allowing women to go bare breasted at beaches could lead to scenes of topless women at libraries and Little League games. They said they were trying to protect families and children.



Because there are so many topless men in Libraries and at LL games.

Live free or Die Baby



Think about the children damn it. How are they gonna know that sex is bad if ladies don't cover their squishy parts.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: The Ecstatic] * 1
    #24919499 -

The Ecstatic said:
But by claiming feminists hate porn, he can say they're hypocrites if they want to walk in public topless. :cookiemonster:



Maybe he's never seen boobs in any context other than porn,


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods]
    #24919668 -

koods said:
LRG said:
Should I be surprised how inconsiderate people like this are?

This isn't Europe. People here are not accustomed to it and are allowed their objections. 

I've lived overseas and don't have an issue with it, but some people here do. Definitely not worthy of being a crime, but this is the sort of thing you do in the privacy of your home in America.

It's not liberating. It's provocative and attention seeking. They expect to be told to cover up, knowing people around them likely don't approve. These are the same type of women who complain about "manspreading" but whip their tits out for attention.



another snowflake defending the fragile Americans who would can't deal with human anatomy.

sweeper54 said:
Quote:
Supporters of the bill warned that allowing women to go bare breasted at beaches could lead to scenes of topless women at libraries and Little League games. They said they were trying to protect families and children.



Because there are so many topless men in Libraries and at LL games.

Live free or Die Baby



Think about the children damn it. How are they gonna know that sex is bad if ladies don't cover their squishy parts.



Snowflake? Aren't you the guy who gets triggered by everything Trump says?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods]
    #24919793 -

koods said:
Think about the children damn it. How are they gonna know that sex is bad if ladies don't cover their squishy parts.









You're welcome.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods]
    #24920021 -

koods said:
Think about the children damn it. How are they gonna know that sex is bad if ladies don't cover their squishy parts.



The children will get over it, our ancestors lived almost naked, you need to get over it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: sweeper54] * 1
    #24920087 -

sweeper54 said:
koods said:
Think about the children damn it. How are they gonna know that sex is bad if ladies don't cover their squishy parts.



The children will get over it, our ancestors lived almost naked, you need to get over it.




pssst.  hey friend, that was sarcasm from koods

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #24920133 -

The Ecstatic said:
But by claiming feminists hate porn, he can say they're hypocrites if they want to walk in public topless. :cookiemonster:



No, feminism is about empowering women to make their own choices, that includes their own sex lives.

Yet, when it comes to pornography many feminists tell women that they can't make that choice because they feel porn exploits women, that's the hypocrisy.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: qman] * 1
    #24920266 -

"Many feminists..."


So, what? More than one person who calls themselves a feminist has that opinion so they automatically speak for feminism as a whole?

More likely, some feminists critique aspects of pornography, such as sex trafficking, and you take that out of context in order to criticize feminists and call them hypocrites.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: The Ecstatic] * 1
    #24920614 -

Why are we even entertaining his premise. Walking around topless has NOTHING to do with pornography.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods]
    #24920937 -

No, but catching a glimpse of old lady pancake titties may be an eye sore to some people.

As far as sexual harassment goes.....would it be for the better or worse? Undeniably, men are attracted  physically to things....even the above, those sick bastards.


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: SirTripAlot]
    #24920951 -

SirTripAlot said:
No, but catching a glimpse of old lady pancake titties may be an eye sore to some people.

As far as sexual harassment goes.....would it be for the better or worse? Undeniably, men are attracted  physically to things....even the above, those sick bastards.



And women just hate fit, shirtless dudes.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #24921055 -

The Ecstatic said:
"Many feminists..."


So, what? More than one person who calls themselves a feminist has that opinion so they automatically speak for feminism as a whole?

More likely, some feminists critique aspects of pornography, such as sex trafficking, and you take that out of context in order to criticize feminists and call them hypocrites.



"Second-wave feminists, contrarily, often have a solidified belief that the oppression and/or sexual objectification of women is inherent to all pornography involving them."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_pornography

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: qman]
    #24921080 -

Sounds right to me. Guys aren't watching porn because of the plot, great dialogue and solid acting.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Rights of the Tits [Re: koods] * 2
    #24921094 -

Progressive women want to be naked in public and want lots of immigration from third world countries.

Progressive women all have rape fantasies?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Original Sensible Seeds Feminized Cannabis Seeds   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* feminists
( 1 2 3 all )
DoctorJ 4,371 45 05/04/06 11:16 PM
by blaze2
* "Bush is an idiot, but he was right about Saddam" EchoVortex 1,686 14 03/23/03 01:03 AM
by Xlea321
* Rise of the far-right in France and Europe
( 1 2 3 4 ... 710 711 )
circastes 303,819 14,200 02/23/25 01:10 PM
by Brian Jones
* The United States is NOT Capitalist...
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
trendalM 17,959 133 09/28/09 01:34 PM
by Phred
* Political Justice, the "right" to survive?
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 3,138 27 12/22/03 06:51 PM
by Crobih
* What are our rights? z@z.com 1,214 18 06/19/03 05:30 PM
by z@z.com
* rights, liberty, government... Anonymous 1,264 18 08/27/03 12:11 AM
by DeepDish2
* Know your rights Card. Have it on you! Anonymous 935 4 10/20/02 12:59 AM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
1,443 topic views. 1 members, 7 guests and 13 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.035 seconds spending 0.012 seconds on 16 queries.