soulmates? - Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Home | Community | Message Board

You are not signed in.
New Account

Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post

Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 [ show all ]

Telepylus
Babyman

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 996
Loc: Seattle
Last seen: 17 years, 5 months

Re: soulmates?

[Re: Telepylus]
#5720155 - 06/06/06 06:39 PM (17 years, 10 months ago)

wow this is crazy-

Huehuecoyotl said:
Soulmate = codependancy. A healthy relationship is based on independance...not attachment.

then Dr. J agreed with him.

Love is a codependant situation.
Independance is seperatism, and suggests that you are whole outside of the family unit. which is true for some people like hermits and monks.

Love is attachment, by deinition of the word.
And i think that thinking otherwise is unhealthy.
sounds like setting up walls to hide behind, thinking you are individual or seperate when in fact, you're not.

Love is attachment to the spirit, which is detached from distractions of material things or circumstances.

Extras:

Top

Sinbad
Living TheMoment

Registered: 12/23/04
Posts: 2,571
Loc: Under The Bodhi Tree

Re: soulmates?

[Re: DoctorJ]
#5720202 - 06/06/06 06:53 PM (17 years, 10 months ago)

"We live together, we act on, and react to, one another; but always and in all circumstances we are by ourselves. The martyrs go hand in hand into the arena; they are crucified alone. Embraced, the lovers desperatley try to fuse their insulated ecstacies into a single self-transcendence; in vain. By its very nature every embodied spirit is doomed to suffer and enjoy solitude. Sensations, feelings, insights, fancies - all these are private and, except through symbols are at second hand, incommunicable. We can pool information about experiences but never the experiences themselves. From family to nation, every human group is a society of island universes."

- Aldous Huxley, Doors of Perception -

--------------------

Edited by Sinbad (06/06/06 07:07 PM)

Extras:

Top

Telepylus
Babyman

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 996
Loc: Seattle
Last seen: 17 years, 5 months

Re: soulmates?

[Re: Sinbad]
#5720233 - 06/06/06 07:04 PM (17 years, 10 months ago)

it's true at the end there is only One.
and you are allOne in your death.
your death is between U and God, which may be the same person but we're not certain on that yet.

there is alot happening inbetween here & there though.
in eternal heaven i am at one with my family, my ancestors, and my children.
and because i know this fact, i love them the same here on earth.
my wife and children are not seperate from me, we are one being, and that is the truth.
the illusion is that we are seperate and individual.
sure our personalities and fingerprints are unique and individual.
but those are masks.
those are the illusions.

on the earth, your thoughts are private.
you are lead to believe that your thoughts are private.
but your thoughts aren't private at all.
not if you believe in God, or the akashic record.
the idea that your thoughts and deeds are private, that is a fear game, and lying to yourself, in DENIAL-don't even know i am lying, lol

and sometimes incommunicable things are mysteriously communicated between minds. (although it might require some LSD inbetween, lol)

Extras:

Top

Telepylus
Babyman

Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 996
Loc: Seattle
Last seen: 17 years, 5 months

Re: soulmates?

[Re: Telepylus]
#5720249 - 06/06/06 07:10 PM (17 years, 10 months ago)

is having sex to create a living child a co-dependent situation?

if you're doing it properly yes, lol

and it's not a simple dependency between man and wife either,
it's a trinity
if it be you understand the nature of time, then clearly the unborn child is an equal in the whole process.

Extras:

Top

Jump to top

Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Similar Threads	Poster	Views	Replies	Last post
SoulMates ( 1 2 all )	niteowl	2,106	31	03/02/05 11:26 AM by Psychoactive1984
Soulmates	leery11	1,327	10	12/12/07 04:05 PM by Icelander
Perfection	LoverofEarth	1,195	9	03/16/03 06:22 AM by minusrestraint
Soulmates (not for the faint of heart) ( 1 2 all )	Anonymous	4,440	29	12/10/02 09:49 PM by MushroomSally
Of True Love, Wedding Vows and Soulmates ( 1 2 all )	OrgoneConclusion	4,222	30	07/30/09 09:02 PM by andrewss
Tiger Woods to Mistress: You are my soulmate!	OrgoneConclusion	1,222	13	12/14/09 03:07 PM by Gastronomicus
i think i just had a breakthrough....EVERYONE, or GOD IS PERFECT ( 1 2 3 all )	hoopershroomer	4,414	45	01/18/07 12:09 AM by ck10n3
The imPERFECTion of THE Perfect RIDDLE....	PhanTomCat	3,059	17	01/18/14 06:37 AM by Gomp

Extra information

You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
3,393 topic views. 0 members, 11 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]