>You're obviously a newbie. I'm one of the few people around here that is very skeptical of the idea of enlightenment from psychedelic drugs and am definitely very scientifically oriented (empiricist). <
As far as my ?newbie? status goes?
Kid registered on: 07/21/00 11:00 PM
Sclorch registered on: 07/12/99 11:00 PM
Enlightenment? can anyone ever claim that? Really? There isn?t a litmus test for it, so why even bother naming it in the first place? The phenomenon was named by elitists who wished to gain power over those who were ignorant. Power to change the ignorant. Though they sort of knew that the ignorant had to come to this realization alone, these elitists were trying to be practical. ?Let?s give the poor saps a goal? something to strive for. Then they?ll be able to join us.? Now we see that things just don?t come that easy. Drugs can only HELP, they can?t make choices for anybody.
>And yes, philosophy can relate to ANY subject. I don't see why it's so hard for you to grasp that there are philosophical aspects to anything. This happens to be a drug related website. People who discuss mushrooms in a philosophical manner will also be likely, given the current cultural framework, to discuss extraterrestrial life forms and what they might mean. <
That?s the problem? the current cultural framework. The only reason alien crap comes up so much is because of ET and movies like it. I think this forum should go beyond that. We can talk about aliens wherever (school, work, home, parties?) because that kind of talk isn?t taboo. But drugs ARE. So why are there (in the past week or so) more junk posts about aliens in this forum than drugs? One post should be enough for all your crop circles/abductions/whatever.
>For god's sake, never read anything by Michel Foucalt or Jaques Derrida. <
I haven?t read but pieces of those two, nothing terribly interesting.
>How sure you are in your concepts of truth. Part of philosophy is epistemology. You seem to blindly accept the norms concept of what Knowledge is. This is not un-philosophical in itself, but what is un-philosophical is that you won't discuss your ideas of Knowledge and Truth. You simply state: 'This is the way it is. I am Right, and you are Wrong.' <
Discuss what exactly? Look at my posts in the past year? I average less than ten replies. I never once mentioned aliens; I think that is my problem. Shit, people even view the alien posts more. I?m not bitter that I?m not getting attention, I?m bitter because there are so many people here uninterested in purely philosophical matters.
How about ethical relativism vs. ethical absolutism?
How about free will vs. determinism?
How about discussion about the concept of the Self?
How about discussion about how the human brain works and how that relates to human thought?
I?ve discussed these issues AND more, not one receiving a response longer than a paragraph. THESE are some of the unsolved mysteries of the world that need discussion. We can deal with aliens when they show up. For now, is it too much for these discussions to be a little more grounded?
>Which is very foolish for someone who's obviously making assumptions about my character (me a New Age Boy, hahhahahaha). <
That part of the post must not have applied to you (not being a New Ager and all?).
I?ve obviously hit a nerve though? Good. Differences bring forth truths.
>Most scientists do this. Read Thomas Kuhn's, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"<
And I don?t like it. Truth isn?t always functional.
I?m a scientist too, but more along the lines of Ars Scientia (sp?).
>You should start with yourself. Philosophy is about discussing, debating and CONSIDERING alternative views of existence, knowledge and other things. You already come across as very ridgid.<
Look, I have considered these views? It?s not like I don?t constantly question myself either. I just can?t stand the shallow posts that are monopolizing this forum. Rigid? of course I am, every heteroabsolutist should be.
-------------------- Note: In desperate need of a cure...
|